Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/16/2017 1:15:18 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

He can’t be right on everything.

Not only is civil forfeiture an abomination that goes against everything the USC stands for but the WOD is the biggest waste of money and manpower since the WOPoverty.


2 posted on 02/16/2017 1:24:33 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Not tired of winning yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Civil asset forfeiture is just a cash cow for law enforcement. So of course they don’t want to lose their slush fund.


4 posted on 02/16/2017 1:32:32 PM PST by afsnco (18 of 20 in AF JAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I have no problem at all with forfeiture in certain cases *if* they're preceded by some sort of criminal conviction.Temporary seizure in anticipation of a criminal trial might also be OK.

Otherwise....F**K THAT!

5 posted on 02/16/2017 1:49:51 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I wrote to Pres. Trump and expressed my view that civil asset forfeiture undermines trust in the law and the Constitution. I recommended forfeiture should only result from a guilty conviction.

Write to President Trump. Let him know how you feel.

6 posted on 02/16/2017 1:50:29 PM PST by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Hang on...just read a little further.It would appear that my attitude toward forfeitures is at least partially in sync with the American Communist Lawyers' Union.

I think I'm gonna have to rethink my position....carefully!

7 posted on 02/16/2017 1:52:39 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

the Fourth Amendment is CLEAR, Due Process is supposed to mean just what it states. The policing agencies and their individuals who ignore the Constitution’s Bill of Rights by performing illegal confiscation prior to a court finding one guilty needs to be stopped. A judge is not the Constitution nor did the enforcing officers illegally confiscate personal property from a citizen take an oath to the judge who tells them its okay to ignore their oath of office. The US Constitution; Trump needs to learn it, live it and defend it by ridding the entire legal system of those who don’t.


9 posted on 02/16/2017 1:57:40 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I can think of one person where I would be all for asset forfeiture: George Soros.


10 posted on 02/16/2017 1:58:32 PM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I believe this activity is wrong, but, folks, Trump doesn't even have a cabinet in place, yet.

Everyone is going nuts over wanting everything done the first day in office, it would seem. Lay off of Trump, @-holes!

11 posted on 02/16/2017 1:59:05 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

IF the house and senate would get the really big stuff done then we can talk about the other important things


14 posted on 02/16/2017 3:17:28 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson