Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling Blocking Trump Ban Doesn’t Even Mention the Applicable Law
Frontpage ^ | February 15, 2017 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 02/15/2017 5:50:52 AM PST by detective

President Trump’s “Muslim ban,” the focus of so much Left hysteria, is dead for the time being, after the hard-Left 9th Circuit Court of Appeals struck it down. What is odd, however, in their ruling is that it never even mentions the relevant law by which Trump claims the authority to limit immigration in the first place. Here it is:

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; bordersecurity; courts; lawsuit; ruling; trump
The court ruling on Trump's immigration ban is clearly judicial misconduct.

The courts are on the side of terrorists and against the safety of the American people.

1 posted on 02/15/2017 5:50:52 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

It’s not the Law, but who rules.


2 posted on 02/15/2017 5:52:20 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (I thank God, Broom Hillary was stopped. Now, moving on, I pray for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The tyranny of the black-robed despots.


3 posted on 02/15/2017 5:54:29 AM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Did The 9th Circuit Judge Lie? New Report Finds 72 Terrorists Came Here From Countries Covered By Trump Ban
Zero Hedge | 11 February 2017 | Tyler Durden / FR Posted by Lorianne

The federal judge who halted President Donald Trump's travel ban was wrong in stating that no one from the seven countries targeted in Trump's order has been arrested for extremism in the United States since the 2001 terrorist attacks.

In fact, as a new report finds, 72 individuals from the seven 'mostly Muslim countries' covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism since 9/11.

And now, having denied President Trump's appeal, claiming his policy "would cause irreparable injury," would cause irreparable injury, it seems the entire premise of the seven "mostly muslim" nations' mostly-peaceful, non-terrorist ways are in doubt as The Center for Immigration Studies shows that...

A review of information compiled by a Senate committee in 2016 reveals that 72 individuals from the seven countries covered in President Trump's vetting executive order have been convicted in terror cases since the 9/11 attacks.

In June 2016 the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, then chaired by new Attorney General Jeff Sessions, released a report on individuals convicted in terror cases since 9/11.

Using open sources (because the Obama administration refused to provide government records), the report found that 380 out of 580 people convicted in terror cases since 9/11 were foreign-born.

The report is no longer available on the Senate website, but a summary published by Fox News is available here (link on FR).

The Center has obtained a copy of the information compiled by the subcommittee. The information compiled includes names of offenders, dates of conviction, terror group affiliation, federal criminal charges, sentence imposed, state of residence, and immigration history.

The Center has extracted information on 72 individuals named in the Senate report whose country of origin is one of the seven terror-associated countries included in the vetting executive order: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The Senate researchers were not able to obtain complete information on each convicted terrorist, so it is possible that more of the convicted terrorists are from these countries.

The United States (under Obama and then-DHS Secy Jeh Johnson) has admitted terrorists from all of the seven dangerous countries: ◦Somalia: 20 ◦Yemen: 19 ◦Iraq: 19 ◦Syria: 7 ◦Iran: 4 ◦Libya: 2 ◦Sudan: 1 ◦Total: 72

According to the report, at least 17 individuals entered as refugees from these terror-prone countries. Three came in on student visas and one arrived on a diplomatic visa.

--SNIP--

More on FR.

4 posted on 02/15/2017 5:55:28 AM PST by Liz (Coulters Law: the MSM's delay inreporting a perp means the less likely it's a white Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

5 posted on 02/15/2017 5:55:39 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“The court ruling on Trump’s immigration ban is clearly judicial misconduct. “

The ruling was that the president cannot ban legal residents from reentering the U.S.


6 posted on 02/15/2017 5:56:08 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Law? We don’t have to show you no steenkin’ law. The chains of collectivism are placed on Americans by anti-Constitutionalists in black robes. Illegals keep pouring in. The republic is under attack by enemies foreign and domestic.

War by asymmetric means.


7 posted on 02/15/2017 6:04:06 AM PST by PGalt (HOORAY President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

And that is why any judge who fails to consider Article II of the Constitution and any subsequent and applicable law should be impeached.


8 posted on 02/15/2017 6:14:53 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
There is a bureaucratic solution to the entry problem. Put in place a 100% sure vetting process, right now. Make the gauntlet almost impossible to navigate (like Obamacare). Maybe people coming in have to post a $1,000,000 bond to insure that that they will break NO American laws, even a parking ticket. Maybe they have to eat a ham sandwich. Maybe they have to agree to an ankle bracelet.

You get the idea.

9 posted on 02/15/2017 6:20:56 AM PST by super7man (Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

According to the judge, Washington State and Minnesota have the right to set immigration policy, but the President of the United States does not. Sheesh


10 posted on 02/15/2017 7:03:20 AM PST by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

No problem. The Circuit court ruling wasn’t signed by any of the 3 justices.

OTOH, I wouldn’t be surprised if a contingent of armed Marines showed up at court tomorrow to escort the 3 justices, and the AG and governor of WA, to Gitmo to await trial for obstructing an officer in the performance of his national security duties (Trump).


11 posted on 02/15/2017 7:09:40 AM PST by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

So now, as according to law, President Trump can issue an order stopping all muzzies from entering the country.

This will cause a lot of exploding heads.


12 posted on 02/15/2017 8:24:26 AM PST by oldasrocks (rump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: detective

President Trump needs to bring visas from those countries to a near halt. If we can’t ban them, make future visas VERY rare.

Assign just one person to handle all of the visas from all of those countries and give him clear orders to make sure every one granted is so thoroughly vetted that he would be happy to have that person stay in his home or he doesn’t approve the visa - and give the job to someone injured in the Baltimore Marathon bombing, the Orlando night club shooting, the San Bernardino attack, the Fort Hood workplace violence, or one of the other attacks that “never happened” under Obama.

If the courts overreach their proper bounds, they need to deal with unintended consequences.


13 posted on 02/15/2017 9:19:36 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson