Posted on 02/14/2017 4:35:30 AM PST by sevinufnine
Univision anchor Jorge Ramos squared off with Fox News' Sean Hannity Monday night in a debate over President Donald Trump's illegal immigration policy, with Ramos calling the president the "deportation czar."
Ramos, who famously confronted Trump on the campaign trail over his promise to build a wall across the southern border hours after the president took credit for a series of raids that netted 680 undocumented immigrants in six major cities.
"The vast majority of immigrants in this country," Ramos told Hannity, "are not criminals, are not terrorists, and are not rapists ... Immigrants are less likely to be criminals than those born in the United States. Immigrants are less likely to be behind bars than U.S. citizens."
"That's not true," responded Hannity, who later asked Ramos "Should every criminal illegal alien be thrown out of this country? Every one?"
"If they committed a crime, a REAL CRIME, absolutely," said Ramos, who pointed out that FBI statistics showed violent crime in America has dropped 48 percent since 1990, a period in which the number of undocumented immigrants increased threefold.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
(1) Deport the “undocumented” as quickly as possible. “Chattel Steerage” on a cruise-ship from Galveston to Vera-Cruz (24+/- hours?) might be appropriate, after-all...they ARE FEDERAL felons. We can treat them rather well as we send them to their LEGAL residency.
(2) Place any so-called “anchor babies” not deported in the care of local Child-Protective Services.
(3) Determine if said “anchor-babies” want to rejoin their parents in Mexico and then provide safe and ‘luxurious’ passage to their home (fly them, on the US-dime, to the nearest MX-INTL airport for pick-up; no receipt...no returns. (Let MEX Services deal with the children that are claimed.)
Under FAA rules, POTUS can direct airlines to do such by EO without concern for scheduling and profit. (yes, I know that is fascist).
(4) Determine whether “anchor-children” who have come of age and are resident within the confines of the US, want to stay here or go to their parents home country (local illegal-immigrant college students?).
Those that choose to stay here can and should be allowed VISA status and can be allowed such VISA residency and citizenship assimilation agreements.
Normal WELFARE requirements should apply to those that decide to stay.
Agreed.
They are foreign invaders.
Bull hockey! No more schemes for one parent anchor babies. Been there, done that, sucks bigtime!
Hannity also failed to mention that the woman was a convicted felon: using a phony SS card. She had been ordered deported a few years ago, and somehow it never happened.
Jorge is just trying to make a name for himself among the illegals. I don’t know if he’s known in him homeland.
Arrest all illegal alien invaders. Seize their assets. Imprison them before throwing them out of this country to never to be allowed to return. If they return, shoot them.
“....Destroying American Families’...”
They are not AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guess that’s why his folks named him Whore-Hey...
>
Yes, that is correct. I believe its time for a Constitutional amendment regarding legal status of those born here.
>
Ummm, we already have one.
Like the 2nd, the lawlessness comes from the intentional omission\misreading of the plain English of the text.
No law has been made *clearer* by added reams of lawyer-speak.
Yeah, the “destroying families” business is a real hoot. In many, if not most, cases the families are already separated. To whom are the remittances sent if not family?
I personally know people who have left their spouse and children to come here illegally. They have separated themselves from their family. So sending them back will reunite the family.
The ones who have married and had kids here are the ones who are going to feel the most impact. In some ways I pity them, particularly the ones who have married someone from a different country, for example a Mexican and a Chilano. To which country will they go? Lots of problems for them as a result of breaking our immigration law. But it was their choice and now their consequences.
He was RUDE, evaded answering EVERY question Hannity asked in a direct manner. Then suggested how America is now treating immigrants is against the Constitution.
Hannity quickly pointed out the Constitution only protected American citizens and those on the path to LEGAL status. Of course, that was ignored and the rant on Ramos part continued.
He came across as the typical, holier than thou, liberal snowflake.
I like Hannity but why in the He!! does he bring this A}{⊙| on his program? ? We already know Ramos is a "MAKE MEXAHOLE GREAT AGAIN" supporter.......he's tapped into US citizenship for the material benefits and to use it as a shield when debating.
And that annoying accent coupled with a smugness (like a neighbor who snatches your beer when you're not looking and sez he brought it from his house and what ha gonna do a bout it).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.