Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN’s Callan: 9th Circuit ‘Overreached’ and Applied Constitutional Rights ‘To the World’
breitbart.com ^ | 10 Feb 2017

Posted on 02/10/2017 12:51:03 AM PST by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Helicondelta

41 posted on 02/10/2017 4:26:32 AM PST by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Great quote. We have passed through the looking glass and we are now seeing Rule By Law, not Rule of Law. When ideology and politics are supreme, it doesn’t matter what a legal analysis can show. Judges who start with a conclusion and back into a legal framework to support that conclusion are immune to arguments.


42 posted on 02/10/2017 4:47:48 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

They need to be arrested for sedition.


43 posted on 02/10/2017 4:50:59 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Judge Napolitano is of the opinion that Kagan may be against the 9th’s ruling. I would have suspected Breyer. Who knows, maybe all of them. Obama was struck down 20 times in 9-0 decisions.


It certainly SHOULD be all of them. The courts have gone mad. Or, more specifically, WE have gone mad to allow this sort of stuff without consequences.

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.


44 posted on 02/10/2017 5:22:30 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

To me, proving you have suffered injury only means you have the standing to bring the case to court. The court then determines whether the EO that brought you injury was constitutional or not.

i.e. injury is merely the price of admission. Ad Trump said, even a BAD high school student who was to actually read the constitution and then read this EO would say, OF COURSE it’s constitutional. QED.

This court was taking into consideration information that was completely irrelevant. I’m embarrassed for them.


45 posted on 02/10/2017 5:25:00 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

The eo was already adjudicated by a Boston circuit court judge. He ruled in favor.

Now you have one judge saying yes, and the other saying no.


46 posted on 02/10/2017 5:33:09 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

The positive thing is this will finally raise the issue of what are the consequences for their rulings, especially when they are over-ruled by SCOTUS. They have to have some threat of consequences to level out the playing field again. Maybe if Trump just goes totally Jackson or Lincoln on them.


47 posted on 02/10/2017 5:33:22 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

They just _over_reached_ ; right. They are traitors to their offices and enemies of USA. They actions are deliberate sedition.


48 posted on 02/10/2017 5:33:36 AM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USA completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
This was not an over-reach.

This is an attempt to take over the United States of America using judicial means.
49 posted on 02/10/2017 5:35:11 AM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veracious
I'll even re-state my previous:

The 9th, conspired between themselves and in whatever secret meetings they had together and individually, with enemies of the USA, to deprive USAians of their right to: national borders, Constitutional government and both individual and national security.

It is quite likely that the _judges_ met with agents of Moslem Brotherhood, or Soros tp be advised about their decision. They may have each receive one or more calls in the middle of the night, to threaten them with having their heads cut off.

50 posted on 02/10/2017 5:47:16 AM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USA completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RC one

It is time to begin the impeachment of any judge who does not rule by the law. Judges are in place to rule on the law.

It would only take about 4, maybe 5 impeachments to send a very clear message: Judges Must Rule On The Law!!


51 posted on 02/10/2017 6:14:47 AM PST by Demanwideplan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Gorsuch needs to be confirmed...and fast.


52 posted on 02/10/2017 7:45:00 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The future doesn't belong to the fainthearted. It belongs to the brave. - - Ronaldus Magnus Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I’m with Napolitano that Trump should go straight to the Supremes. He is likely to get a 5-3 victory. Then he can extend the ban indefinitely.


53 posted on 02/10/2017 8:07:14 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Trump need to just totally close the borders then. Not discriminating against any one set of people. Just keeping us safe.

He also needs to take the LAW in hand and file impeachment orders against all the judges who voted to circumvent his legal duties.


54 posted on 02/10/2017 8:22:58 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

How many times were people who sought to determine Obama’s eligibility told that their injury was not particularized?


55 posted on 02/10/2017 10:25:08 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson