[Innovative]

I certainly hope so.

[Truth29]

That is if the law is governing. If it is pure politics, then the 9th Circuit will rule against the Administration because the law has become what a Lefty judge says when they say it.

[Hurricane]

“seven predominantly Muslim countries”

Purposely misleading
Should read
SEVEN PREDOMINATLY HIGH RISK TERRORIST COUNTRIES

[Gay State Conservative]

I'm most certainly not a lawyer but my basic question on this matter is: has any President,by Executive Order,restricted,or halted,entry into the US by citizens of a particular country or group of countries?

If the answer is "yes",one would think that DJT has the Constitutional authority to do so.

[Principled]

Two things happen when libtards fight everything, _everything_, tooth and nail.

1) they look kookier and more deranged every day

2) they lose more 2018 senate and house seats

They honestly don’t know how foolish they look because they do not hear any voice unless it echoes their preexisting worldview. Not even any voices from any of the 31 states that rejected them.

Keep on fighting libtards. You’ll just lose tired ;)

[grobdriver]

At the ninth circuit court?

Those idiots will rule against the President just for the laugh.

[plain talk]

The EO does not say “muslim” but Trump’s intent was made clear during the campaign. During the campaign he said he wanted to exclude muslims from coming into this country. He later backtracked and changed it to specific countries.

So the whole world knows the real intent of this EO. However legal rulings should be based on the specific language in the EO and not campaign rhetoric. But I think what is happening here is that the leftist judges know Trump’s original intent and are using it as an opportunity to attack his EO.

[Yulee]

Is it true that the DOJ has to appeal?

Is it also true that the head of the DOJ currently is an Obama holdover?

If so, until Sessions is voted into office and the DOJ drained, we will have to put up with the obstructions by DEMs in high places.

[Let's Roll]

It is based on existing law rather than fee-wings.

[Let's Roll]

It is based on existing law rather than fee-wings.

[Professional]

Soooooooo can I ask why we don’t just steam roll ahead, and declare that the judge’s opinion isn’t welcome and the ruling legal authority has spoken. Any further effort to impede federal efforts to safeguard the nation will be met with legal force.

[EDINVA]

Interesting that the MSM continually refers to the 7 “predominantly Muslim” countries, rather than the 7 “most active terrorist breeding” countries.