Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Fight Is More About Trump Than Gorsuch
New York Times ^ | FEB. 2, 2017 | CARL HULSE

Posted on 02/04/2017 8:44:55 AM PST by detective

This is a rare Supreme Court confirmation fight that will be more about the nominator than the nominee.

In light of President Trump’s selection of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch just as the new president’s aggressive and contested use of executive power came into view, Democrats intend to aggressively question whether Judge Gorsuch will hold in check the man who seeks to elevate him to the nation’s most influential court.

Democrats believe a unique sequence of events — issuing a constitutionally questionable executive order on Friday, firing an acting attorney general who refused to defend it on Monday and nominating a Supreme Court justice on Tuesday — places executive overreach and separation of powers squarely at the center of the confirmation debate.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; first100days; gorsuch; scotus; trump; trump45; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Logical me

The Senate makes its own rules.


21 posted on 02/04/2017 9:27:13 AM PST by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: detective

“Supreme Court Fight Is More About Trump Than Gorsuch”

I believe this to be very true.

The leftists goal is to destroy Trump using any means possible.

Gorsuch has been nominated by Trump. Gorsuch has to go in front of the leftists before getting a vote. So if the leftists can destroy Gorsuch, then they believe they are destroying Trump. Even if they maim or wound Gorsuch in any way, then they believe this is a maim or wound on Trump.


22 posted on 02/04/2017 10:09:58 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Question

If the "nuclear option" is implemented by changing Senate rules, can McConnell change the rules back if we lose the senate in the election in 2 years?

23 posted on 02/04/2017 10:16:52 AM PST by submarinerswife (Allahu FUBAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

If the rhinos don’t stab us in the back ala Mer’COW’sky and Collins we should be alright!!


24 posted on 02/04/2017 10:29:16 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Blah blah blah from NYSlimes - it’s about the Constitution and the People.


25 posted on 02/04/2017 11:38:01 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson