At Auschwitz, a Jewish journalist confronts his anti-Polish bias

JTA ^ | January 25, 2017 | Cnaan Liphshiz

[Godebert]

Fascinating. Thanks for posting. I once had a German WWI Gewehr 98 infantry rifle which was used by the Freikorps post-war. It had the large EWB (Eienwohnerwehr Bayern) stamp on the butt. While holding the rifle in my hands, I often wondered how many Bolsheviks might have been killed with it.

[little jeremiah]

I always appreciate your pings! And I check your name for comments too.

[rmlew]

btw, what I posted came from Google Images. I never visited any anti-Semitic website.

Fair enough.

And the best thing you can do is read the two Gulag volumes by Solzhenitsyn. You don’t get off scot-free by calling him senile.

You are assuming
1. I haven't read these
2. I don't come from an Eastern European Jewish family with members who killed communists, and other members who were communists.
3. That a dozen members of my family were not killed summarily by Soviets or sent to Gulags and killed
4. That 3 members of my family survived Gulags.

I know the truth of the matter and Solzhenitsyn was giving the convenient lie: blaming Jews to absolve Russians and Ukranians and ignoring institutional communist antisemitism.

[rmlew]

First you claim that you don’t go to antisemitic website and then you post an article by a Holocaust denier and a man who cherry picks names to lie?

[Fred Nerks]

I read stuff and share it. We can’t vet every word and every author. You have about as much chance of being 100% right about everything as anyone else has. And if I post items here from Google Images or bloggers, that doesn’t mean I’m a an anti-Semite. I’m a post WW2 migrant from europe in Australia trying to understand the past...funny, how every time I touch upon this subject, you are right there, to jump on me.

Just like you did when I drew attention to that twisted sicko Barbara Lerner Spectre.

So now another author is an Holocaust Denier, and Solzhenitsin is senile...do I have to run everything by you before it’s acceptable to discuss?

[rmlew]

So now another author is an Holocaust Denier, and Solzhenitsyn is senile...do I have to run everything by you before it’s acceptable to discuss?
There is a fundamental difference between a great man, who has gone senile, and an evil man lying. I was happy to discuss Solzhenitsyn.

Spectre is an evil woman. Pointing out that you don't understand the context of that woman, was not an attack on you. You are a victim of Nazi disinformation and propoganda, where they spliced her comments out of a larger piece, which showed Jews opposing her lunacy. Am I bitterly angry at having to inform yet another person of this, knowing that even if I inform 10,000 people of it, 50,000 people will never here it, and half the people I tell the truth to won't believe it? Yes, I am. If, I was rude, I apologize.

[rmlew]

As a side, note, you may be interested in the works of my friend Lawrence Auster,

[Fred Nerks]

Thank you, I’ve saved the link to read later.