Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scholastic Book Club New Selection Sure to Cause Lib Melt (vanity)
Scholastic Book of Presidents ^

Posted on 01/10/2017 12:59:59 PM PST by TigerClaws



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: childrensliterature
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2017 12:59:59 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Should come with a free small MAGA hat.


2 posted on 01/10/2017 1:02:30 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Bush the Younger, Obama, and Nixon.... but not Reagan?


3 posted on 01/10/2017 1:02:40 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I noticed that right off. There was no Clinton inclusion either.

I’m sure they didn’t want to contrast Reagan and Trump with the clowns the Democrats have lofted over the last 50 years.


4 posted on 01/10/2017 1:05:28 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Recall John McCain. NOW, before he gets us in WWIII.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Where’s Jimmy Carter?


5 posted on 01/10/2017 1:06:01 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws; BenLurkin

I’m APPALLED!
WHERE IS MILLARD FILLMORE?!?!?!?!?...............


6 posted on 01/10/2017 1:07:36 PM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Nixon is still the most hated Republican by the 60s leftist professor types. Likely why he’s included as a ‘typical Republican.’

Reagan, of course, would have been more appropriate.


7 posted on 01/10/2017 1:07:58 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I didn’t know they still had the Scholastic Book Club. In the 60’s I used to save my pennies so I could buy a book every month.


8 posted on 01/10/2017 1:13:29 PM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Where’s Jimmy Carter?”

In Judea, protesting Jewish people not dying.


9 posted on 01/10/2017 1:14:00 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
In Judea, protesting Jewish people not dying.

Is he joining the Judean Peoples' Front, or the Peoples' Front of Judea?

10 posted on 01/10/2017 1:15:18 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I agree.

I’ve never been shy about defending Nixon to a degree. He did some things that were wrong, there’s no denying it. What we have found out about other presidents causes him to be far less of a ‘demon’ figure than the academics and left want him to be seen for.

Contrast his likely win in 1960, with Al Gore’s clear loss in 2000. Nixon graciously stood down for the benefit of the nation. Al Gore tried to split the nation apart for personal gain.

Clinton was at least ten times as bad. Obama was perhaps 100 times as bad.

Nixon loved our nation.

Nixon never sold out our nation. He didn’t facilitate technology transfers to other nations that would harm us. He never sided with terrorist groups that wanted to hurt the United States.

There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of Nixon moving avowed lifetime terrorist enemies of our nation here to butcher our citizens.


11 posted on 01/10/2017 1:16:23 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Recall John McCain. NOW, before he gets us in WWIII.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan; All

Scholastic Book Club and its publishing arm has been taken over by the LGBT crowd. I’d look askance at anything they put out.


12 posted on 01/10/2017 1:19:08 PM PST by mumblypeg (Chicago called. They want their village idiot back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Doesn’t mean their portrayal of Trump is positive.


13 posted on 01/10/2017 1:19:46 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg

Sorry to hear that. My favorite day at school was the Friday when the monthly catalog came out and we got to pick out the book we wanted.


14 posted on 01/10/2017 1:22:08 PM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Yes, I agree. I considered that too.


15 posted on 01/10/2017 1:23:10 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Recall John McCain. NOW, before he gets us in WWIII.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Nixon signed the EPA into law and opened diplomacy with China. He also signed the first nuke treaty with the Soviets.

Libs might rewrite the history on Nixon in another fifty years


16 posted on 01/10/2017 1:24:20 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

EPA was a major mistake.

Opening up China was reasoned.

I’m rather neutral on the nuclear treaty.

Reagan believed in those also. It’s one thing I wasn’t real comfortable with. How could you trust or verify the U.S.S.R. to carry though?

I think Nixon is fixed in their minds. He’s the buggy man they will never get tired of pointing to.

Folks may think that opening up China was a poor move due to the way the trade was exploited to our loss. China was opened up in 1972. Our trade deficits with China did not surpass those with Japan until the year 2000, 27 years later.

The initial goal was to open up a closed society that had gone nuclear, and play it off against Russia. I’m not convinced that didn’t happen pretty much the way we wanted it to.

Around 1992, the trade went ballistic. Some of us trashed the idea on the basis of lost jobs in the U.S., the transfers of technology with a clearly intent enemy, and the destabilization it would ultimately deliver.

I said at the time that our young men and women would wind up dying in large numbers due to the trade fiasco, and that we would be lucky if people on the mainland didn’t suffer the same fate.

I do not blame Nixon or Kissinger for this. Bush/Clinton were the ones who ushered in that massive destructive trade.

Our corporations were also only too eager to kill jobs here for a buck.

None of them had the slightest bit of concern over national security and our own economy.


17 posted on 01/10/2017 1:33:44 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Recall John McCain. NOW, before he gets us in WWIII.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

PLO

Peanut Leftist Organization


18 posted on 01/10/2017 1:36:59 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

So did I. I still have a lot of those books. That was a magical time.


19 posted on 01/10/2017 1:41:30 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Loved those books - Clifford the big Red Dog, or whatever it was


20 posted on 01/10/2017 1:47:45 PM PST by 11th_VA (2016 - Best Election Ever !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson