Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer: We Will Only Work With Trump If He 'Abandons Republicans' (In Your Dreams, Chuckie)
Townhall.com ^ | January 9, 2017 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 01/09/2017 11:35:17 AM PST by Kaslin

Last week was a bit interesting from the Senate Democrat side. The olive branch that was offered by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the new Senate Minority Leader, was blunt and straightforward to the incoming Trump White House. We’ll only work with you if you abandon the Republicans and adhere to 100 percent of what we want to do (via Real Clear Politics/CNN):

CHUCK SCHUMER: I said, Mr. President-elect, you went after both the Democratic and Republican establishments when you ran. You were an anti-establishment change candidate. But by your cabinet picks and your early pronouncements, you seem to be embracing your timeworn, shop-worn hard right.

[CNN’s Dana] BASH (on camera): You said that to him?

SCHUMER: I did.

BASH: What did he say?

SCHUMER: Nothing.

But I said to him, if you do that, your presidency will not come close to being a success.

BASH (voice-over): For Schumer, success will be even more complicated, a fine line between when to work with Trump and when not to.

SCHUMER: The only way we're going to work with him is if he moves completely in our direction and abandons his Republican colleagues. Ninety, 95 percent of the time, we'll be holding his feet to the fire and holding him accountable. But we're Democrats. We're not going to just oppose things to oppose them.

BASH: I've known you for a long time. You love a deal, not unlike the president-elect. I find that hard to believe, that you don't want to make deals with him.

SCHUMER: Well, here's the problem. The Republicans in the Senate and the House have been run by a hard right group, an almost Tea Party group. And they are so far away from where we are...

BASH: But now they've got a deal maker in the White House, just like you.

SCHUMER: Well, look, we're going to look at the specifics of what is proposed. Of course I'd like to make a deal.

Schumer also said that the Senate Democrats would fight to the death if President-elect Donald Trump nominated someone who isn’t “mainstream” to the Supreme Court. And by not “mainstream,” they of course mean conservative. A Samuel Alito-type candidate, who is eminently qualified to serve as our nation’s next jurist, would be trouble. Even a John Roberts clone would be problematic.

In other words, the Democrats are still mad that Trump won. They’re mad that Russia ran a concerted and coordinated propaganda effort to influence our election, though there no evidence to suggest that it had any impact whatsoever. They’re just a miserable whiny group of people right now. They don’t know how to respond since they probably never imagined this moment: Clinton in permanent retirement, Obama out, and their party in shambles. So, how to avoid exacerbating the headache liberals on the Hill have at present? Well, don’t anger their base; the progressive, snobby, and insufferable elites that infest our nation’s cities. They’re mad too—and remember, they’re pretty much demanding that Democrats do all that they can to stop Trump because he’s Hitler [or insert any authoritarian leader here]—or something.

Also, if you’re shocked that Democrats are thinking and acting as if they won the election, you’re not dreaming. They actually think that—and Schumer’s fighting words encapsulate it. Disregarding basic Americans civics, they feel that because Clinton won more popular votes, though not the majority, that they won the election. Right, and if Texas’ election laws allowed two Republicans, who would probably be the top two-vote getters, run for the same senate seat, then I’m sure we would be closer to a dead heat in the popular vote. Alas, that didn’t happen. And it's irrelevant. Trump won the majority in 30 states to clinch 304 electoral votes. 

On infrastructure, defense spending, and maybe childcare—there could be areas for the Trump White House to work with Schumer. The latter especially is going to put Trump on a collision course with Republicans, though the GOP party leadership is going to have to come to grips that November’s win was not because conservatism made a comeback; neo-populism did. On issues of trade, there could be another area for conflict. Yet, since Obamacare’s repeal and replacement is at the top of the agenda, followed probably by tax reform and job creation—I’m sure Schumer is going to rehash the same Occupy Wall Street slogans that didn’t work. And the GOP is going to stick with Trump on these issues and vice versa.

In all, Democrats got whipped. They don’t get to dictate the agenda. The GOP was in the same position when they were in the minority under Obama. Yes, a lot of drama can unfurl. Some legislative maneuvers could be executed that brings forth a government shutdown. In the end, the office of the president is the biggest bully pulpit and it will most likely emerge on top during any showdown with Congress. I think Democrats know this. They just need to put on a show for their lefty loony bins that Democrats are trying to do something to stop Trump, even though they really can’t.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chuckieschumer; democrats; outoftouch; republicans; schmuckschemer; schumer; senate; trump; upchuck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2017 11:35:17 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Head Clown runs his mouth again.


2 posted on 01/09/2017 11:36:42 AM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What’s up with Reid in that pic? Did his Pizza delivery arrive or something?


3 posted on 01/09/2017 11:36:49 AM PST by COBOL2Java (1 Tim 2:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Republicans in the Senate and the House have been run by a hard right group...

Huh.

4 posted on 01/09/2017 11:37:01 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He’d better, how did Obama put it.. go to the back of the bus.


5 posted on 01/09/2017 11:37:18 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

He’s wondering if he has enough time to make the minute walk to the restroom.


6 posted on 01/09/2017 11:38:20 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Er, we have the majority and the nuclear option.

Who gives a #### what you do, chucky.

Go watch your perverted, demented niece do stand up.


7 posted on 01/09/2017 11:39:13 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Schumer? The raving New York commie? Work with Trump? NEVER HAPPEN.


8 posted on 01/09/2017 11:39:32 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Trump needs to go hardcore on the RED State Democrats who are up for election in 2018. Call them out by name, do a full court press. They will crumble.
9 posted on 01/09/2017 11:40:08 AM PST by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

He sees a (relatively) little boy in the presser and is wooing them.


10 posted on 01/09/2017 11:40:15 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What a silly little man...


11 posted on 01/09/2017 11:40:47 AM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
SCHUMER: The only way we're going to work with him is if he moves completely in our direction and abandons his Republican colleagues. Ninety, 95 percent of the time, we'll be holding his feet to the fire and holding him accountable. But we're Democrats. We're not going to just oppose things to oppose them.

Yea right. Chuckie. Go back to your office and have a scotch or whatever.

12 posted on 01/09/2017 11:41:24 AM PST by mc5cents (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

schumer is such a dweeb who embarrasses humanity through his stunted, malignant logic.


13 posted on 01/09/2017 11:41:31 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

No, I think it’s an old picture, not a current one.


14 posted on 01/09/2017 11:44:19 AM PST by Kaslin ( Start by doing what's necessary; then do what's possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
SCHUMER: "The only way we're going to work with him is if he moves completely in our direction and abandons his Republican colleagues."

"... in fact," Schumer continued, "We demand that Trump stand down immediately and appoint Barack Obama President again. Otherwise, we won't work with him."

15 posted on 01/09/2017 11:44:23 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Republicans always do so well when they take Democrat advice.


16 posted on 01/09/2017 11:47:10 AM PST by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Chuck is crazier than a bedbug and just as hard to get rid of if a camera is around.


17 posted on 01/09/2017 11:47:49 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Just ignore these @sshats. Just ignore them. They have no leverage. Zilch.


18 posted on 01/09/2017 11:49:46 AM PST by nikos1121 (I would love to see Rudy in charge of the FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Hey. Chuck U. You don’t have the votes to stop it.


19 posted on 01/09/2017 11:50:39 AM PST by Shady (We WON the Battle, Now let's WIN THE WAR!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
YES CHUCKY


20 posted on 01/09/2017 11:57:28 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson