Hmmm: FBI, CIA never examined DNC servers?

From:

International Data Group – CSO Info

Salted Hash- Top security news
By Steve Ragan | Senior Staff Writer

News
DNC hacker slams CrowdStrike, publishes opposition memo on Donald Trump
235 page opposition memo is among the recently released cache of files
CSO | Jun 15, 2016 2:07 PM PT
•

The headquarters of the Democratic National Committee is seen in Washington, U.S. June 14, 2016. Russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee and gained access to all opposition research on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, the committee and security researchers said on Tuesday.
A hacker claiming responsibility for the DNC hack that made headlines earlier this week has slammed the security company responsible for the incident response, and leaked several documents compromised during the incident – including a 235-page opposition memo on Donald Trump.
On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that hackers – believed to be Russian – compromised the Democratic National Committee network and walked off with opposition research on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
CrowdStrike, the security firm that was brought in to do incident response, suggested espionage as the likely motive. In fact, later that day, CrowdStrike published reports on two different “APT” groups in Russia, giving them the names Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.
Overall, the Washington Post story actually read more like a promotion for CrowdStrike’s incident response offerings than actual security news.
But the fact is, someone targeted the DNC directly and that is news worth watching. At the same time, many experts felt it was a stretch to hype the incident as some sort of massive international conspiracy.
The hacker claiming responsibility for the DNC attack (using the alias Guccifer 2.0) mocked CrowdStrike’s assessment that he was a sophisticated hacker group, noting that he was pleased the company “appreciated my skills so highly. But in fact, it was easy, very easy.”
“Guccifer may have been the first one who penetrated Hillary Clinton’s and other Democrats’ mail servers. But he certainly wasn’t the last. No wonder any other hacker could easily get access to the DNC’s servers. Shame on CrowdStrike: Do you think I’ve been in the DNC’s networks for almost a year and saved only 2 documents? Do you really believe it?”
As proof, he published the full opposition report on Donald Trump, which describes the GOP presidential candidate having “no core.”
The 235-page memo is essentially a timeline and collection of comments and speeches given by Trump, as well as an overview of his political stance and mindset.
A 2-page memo to the DNC was included in the cache of posted files, which outlines the suggested positioning and public message strategy around the national election and the match-up between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
In response to DNC comments that no financial information was accessed during the attack, several donor lists were also published on Wednesday by the hacker, showing millions in financial contributions from Hollywood elites, businesses, trade groups, and unions.
The hacker ended their disclosure with a notice that a bulk of the compromised documents, including memos marked confidential and secret – allegedly taken from Hillary Clinton’s personal email server – were delivered to WikiLeaks.
“The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to WikiLeaks. They will publish them soon. I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company’s competence,” they wrote.
Salted Hash reached out to CrowdStrike for comment, but the company wasn’t able to respond before this article was published. It will be updated with additional details as they become available.
Update:
CrowdStrike didn’t respond to questions directly, but issued the statement below.
“CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016 a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claiming credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee. This blog post presents documents alleged to have originated from the DNC.

“Whether or not this posting is part of a Russian Intelligence disinformation campaign, we are exploring the documents’ authenticity and origin. Regardless, these claims do nothing to lessen our findings relating to the Russian government’s involvement, portions of which we have documented for the public and the greater security community.”

So.... Crowdstrike looks like the pivot man in this circle jerk...

Trump chose Mike Pompeo for CIA. He has a pretty attractive resume.

Comey is still in place but hopefully he’ll be dispatched quickly.

Crowdstrike was co-founded by a Russian ex-pat, Dmitri Alperovitch, and George Kurtz. They are funded by venture capital firms Warburg Pincus and Accel Partners to the tune of 56 million and only produced 13.8 million in Revenue as of 2014. They are probably bigger now, but the Venture firms are in their hind-brain every 90 days.

Someone could check the various names for donations but it looks like they found indications by their software that there was hacking into their email in May of 2015 realtime.

This means they knew and did not announce it until it suited them even though they told the FBI.

See:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a49902/the-russian-emigre-leading-the-fight-to-protect-america/

this stoopid has turned every gub mint agency in to dog meat.
NO confidence in any aspect of the federal gub mint.

HAhahahahahaha, outstanding. Marxists one and all.

Shepard Smith is editorializing again on what Fox represents as a news program. He is not just expressing an opinion; he is basically demagoguing the issue.

Conflating the intelligence agencies in toto with their politically, motivated Obama appointed directors.

He is as bad as anyone on CNN, why doesn’t Fox pull him.

It would not even be appropriate if he was editorializing for Trump or conservatives; but channeling Democratic party talking points is beyond the pale.