Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will J Diamond

Because it is a seal that can only be used with the director’s signature, and there is no director’s signature. It can’t be used if the director’s signature is not there.

If Onaka’s signature is the only signature there, then HIS seal has to be used. And he did NOT use his seal. Full Faith and Credit says other states are to honor another state’s documents if they are certified by the signature and seal of the custodian of the record. Onaka is the custodian of the records and his seal is not there to certify his signature. (And the only lawful reason for him to refuse to certify it is if there isn’t a BC for Obama in Hawaii.)

What is there is FUDDY’S seal, which is not lawful to be there without her signature. She put her seal there to hide the absence of Onaka’s seal, and to deceive the entire country with a document that LOOKS like it’s certified but isn’t. Her fingerprints are ALL OVER this, since she is the only one with the authority to have that seal used, but only where her signature is. But her signature doesn’t belong there because she is not the custodian of the record so she didn’t sign it. Instead she unlawfully put her seal without her signature as a head-fake to hide Onaka’s refusal to certify the document.


75 posted on 01/02/2017 4:51:42 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson