Who is encrouching who?
Posted on 12/27/2016 11:22:26 PM PST by RedWulf
What you don’t seem to understand is that action is what matters. Putin has instituted socially conservative policies. He should be praised for that.
Conservatives should be suspicious of those who attack political leaders who actually carry out conservative policies.
Bringing up Milosevic reminds us all that the neoconservatives always took the side of Muslims against Christians in the various wars as Yugoslavia disintegrated.
You will determine these facts based on what? Would you perform the killings or would you allow the government to kill these people you deem to be globalists?
Milosevic was another opportunist who was a murderous communist. He, like Putin, posed as a nationalist and used rancor and chauvinism to get support. Neither fits the Christian doctrines that have traditionally been those of any Christian faith.
What twisted logic you spin. To suggest that people who fought on the Christian side of a Christian vs. Muslim war are somehow false Christians while those who supported the Muslims are the true Christians is absurd and sick. Fighting on behalf of Christians saves Christian lives, surely a worthy goal. Supporting Muslims fighting Christians, like you do, kills Christians, surely a bad thing from a Christian perspective.
The last part of your statement is logical gibberish. How does a political leader “fit” Christian doctrines? You mean like the Holy Trinity or the Nicene Creed? If you are trying to claim that their actions don’t always follow Christians doctrines, no political leader’s ever have, so it’s a moot point. You also seem to be using “Christian doctrine” as an expression meaning liberal globalism. Your logic assumes the idea that historical Christian cultures practiced enlightenment ideals about democracy and civil rights, an absurdity to all but the most ignorant of Western history. Therefor, Vladimir Putin is un-Christian because he has jailed political dissidents, something that the UK also does and the US has done in the past, for example during the world wars.
Notice EHL’s argumentation style is based on ad hominem attacks and moralizing. He strenuously avoids discussing the real world conflicts at hand and reverts back to insults. He does this to disguise the fact that he taking the wrong, anti-conservative side in these conflicts. He won’t come out and say he supports Muslims conquering Christian lands in the Balkans or that he supports gay marriage in Russia, he just attacks all the forces that fight those things.
Putin is standing up for Christian values and that’s a good thing. I am eternally grateful that he refuses to let his country be controlled by filthy sodomites and will not let them near schools to peddle their filth on young children.
Using your logic, Hezbollah fighting ISIS in Syria is Christian. Shia militias fighting ISIS in Iraq are Christians. Kurds, Sunni Muslims, fighting ISIS in Syria and Iraq are Christians. Jews fighting ISIS in Syria are Christians. Turks fighting ISIS and al Qaeda are Christians, and on and on it would go. You’re the one with a logic problem, though.
And he gets to keep and expand Russian bases on the Mediterranean, the flank of Europe.
bmfl
“The leaders of the west are destroying their own countries and Putin,”
Do yoy have hard evidence to make this claim, or is it based on just “perceorion” & “hearsay” from Putin’s enemies. Just asking ;)
“perception” & “hearsay”
I screwed up my last post to you. It should read like this:
“autocratic journalist killer that he is”
Do you have hard evidence to make this claim, or is it just based on “perception” & “hearsay” by Putin’s enemies? Just asking ;)
I screwed up my last post to you. It should read like this:
“autocratic journalist killer that he is”
Do you have hard evidence to make this claim, or is it just based on “perception” & “hearsay” by Putin’s enemies? Just asking ;)
I screwed up my last post to you. It should read like this:
“autocratic journalist killer that he is”
Do you have hard evidence to make this claim, or is it just based on “perception” & “hearsay” by Putin’s enemies? Just asking ;)
Nonsense. Russia and Serbia are Christian cultures, the examples you mentioned aren’t. You just mmade another logical fallacy.
Russia is the victim. And a perfect Christian country.
Sweden has sent its submarines into Russia's territorial water. Ireland has had its war planes buzzing into Russia's airspace. British war planes are buzzing into Russian airspace. Ukraine is waging an undeclared war with Ukrainian soldiers on Russian territory causing death and destruction in Russia. Ukraine has stacked up a large army on Russia's border poised to intimidate and invade sacred Mother Russia. Ukraine took a large chunk of Russian territory despite a treaty they’d signed to respect Russia’s territory. Lithuania moved nuclear weapons to threaten Kaliningrad. Georgia invaded Russia to support Georgian separatists. Syrians are indiscriminately bombing Russians cities killing Russians in their hospitals and in their markets. Turkish planes are flying over Russian airspace. The USA has its hackers hacking Putin's secret bank accounts and releasing it to the public through Wikileaks. Yeah, Russia is a victim of many aggressive acts.
35 or somesuch?
you should be banned for spreading such manure.
Fake news, isn’t that the new buzzword?
The miracle of the west stands on the three pillars of Jeruslam, Athens and Rome.
Rediscovered in the Renesance, then refined in the enlightenment, before given physical form in the formation of the United States of America.
China has some bright spots in their confucian meritocracy. Ancient Israel in being a nation of laws (God’s laws) which even the rulers needed to obey.
You might have missed it?
Russia (as the Soviet Union) let all of those go, and it’s over.
Who is encrouching who?
Woah interesting map...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.