Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump: US must greatly expand nuclear weapons
BBC (Big Bunch of Commies) ^ | December 22, 2016

Posted on 12/22/2016 10:18:39 AM PST by Navy Patriot

Donald Trump has called for the US to "greatly strengthen and expand" its nuclear arsenal.

The president-elect, who takes office next month, said the US must take such action "until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes".

He spoke hours after President Vladimir Putin said Russia needs to bolster its military nuclear potential.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclearweapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
President Trump will Make America Great ...

... much to Mohammad's dismay.

1 posted on 12/22/2016 10:18:39 AM PST by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Tom Tancredo’s solution


2 posted on 12/22/2016 10:19:45 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Peace through strength.


3 posted on 12/22/2016 10:23:45 AM PST by Rennes Templar (Sea levels are rising- from liberal tears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Donald “Why can’t we use Nukes” Trump!


4 posted on 12/22/2016 10:24:14 AM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Also in case of comets and asteroids....


5 posted on 12/22/2016 10:31:38 AM PST by DesertRhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
WINNING!

And no I am not tired of it.

6 posted on 12/22/2016 10:32:33 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Boy, this announcement ought to make the gentle little snowflakes piss their pants.


7 posted on 12/22/2016 10:41:21 AM PST by BradtotheBone (Record number of people on welfare. That's the State of the Union under Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

the best defense is a good offense


8 posted on 12/22/2016 10:42:03 AM PST by MagillaX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone; All

“Boy, this announcement ought to make the gentle little snowflakes piss their pants”

Oh...they have some really evil comments about Donald (see below).

Apparently they missed this announcement when Obama wanted to expand nuclear weapons (March, 2016):
http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trillion-dollar-question-the-media-have-neglected-to-ask-presidential-candidates/

Evil comments about madman Trump here:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-for-expanded-us-nuclear-weapons-capability/ar-BBxsswV?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartandhp


9 posted on 12/22/2016 11:06:57 AM PST by toldyou (Even if the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

We already have enough nukes.

It would be better to spend the money on security measure research, anti-terror attack training, grant money for crowd protection and public building structural modifications, etc.

The British used to pay their soldiers extra money if they learned critical languages.


10 posted on 12/22/2016 11:25:55 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

We need to modernize. Not so much to expand.


11 posted on 12/22/2016 11:37:54 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Start buying stock and corporate bonds!

Companies that support research, building, maintaining, safety, recycling, and delivery of nuclear weapons :

Boeing (planes /components) ,
Northrup Grumman (B2, components),
General Dynamics (tactical B61 capable fighters, major Ohio SSBN upgrade),
GenCorp Aerojet (safety, plane load),
Huntington Ingalls, (nuclear subs/ships and safety),
Lockheed Martin (Planes, electronics, fusing, bomb hookups, etc) Babcock & Wilcox (uranium enrichment) ,
Betchel (research),
Honeywell (safety, components) ,
URS Corp(Y12 plant ) ,
GE (housing/release/guidance/electrics) ,
Aecom Flour (warhead assembly and plant services) ,
Jacobs Engineering (nuclear facilities and lifecycle),
Alliant Techsystems (targeting/battle damage assessment(BDA), and
Rockwell Collins (guidance/gyros)
IBM (super computers) .

Good to keep an eye out on some of these names. Many smaller companies also support nuclear transporting, storage, and safety, (ITT, Raytheon, Freightliner/Ford/GM, Colt/FN/Motorola, etc), but the big government contracts to the companies above.

12 posted on 12/22/2016 12:16:48 PM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
We already have enough nukes.

No we don't. We cannot realistically say that they all go BANG.

We have to infer that some won't leave the silo, some won't separate, some won't get into orbit, some will break, and many other unforeseen circumstances.

THIS IS WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO TEST our designs with live-fire exercises.

We can't have a true nuclear deterrent unless we can still have nukes in reserve in case anyone tries a "bolt from the blue" or "decapitation" or "counterforce" nuclear strike.

We rely too much on our SSBNs and our ICBMs are critically vulnerable. We have to have lots of reliable nukes in case the unthinkable happens, up until we figure out how to get rid of the damn things. The genie is out of the bottle, and I fear that Pakistan and North Korea won't give them up. Russia MIGHT, but after losing 100mm people in WWII, unlikely.

We also need to update our nuclear weapons for "micronukes" and clean enhanced radiation tactical nukes (neutron bombs). Technology has advanced light years, but we are stuck on, at best mid-to- late 1990s safety, security, guidance, etc.

13 posted on 12/22/2016 12:23:50 PM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Not a bad strategy, I suspect Trump’s “expand” applies to capability, flexibility, creation, updating and options much more than just numbers of warheads


14 posted on 12/22/2016 12:26:05 PM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Navy Patriot

yes
but
he will have to buy the uranium from
Putin/Uranium One/Clintoons/Guestra/Clintoon Foundation


16 posted on 12/22/2016 12:36:00 PM PST by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

5 minutes ago they were saying he’s an agent of the Kremlin, not they say he wants to start a war with them.


17 posted on 12/22/2016 12:37:20 PM PST by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

it’s not that I don’t trust the BBC, well actually, no, I don’t trust the BBC.....when did Trump make this grand announcement?


18 posted on 12/22/2016 12:39:49 PM PST by SteveinSATX (Anti-liberalism 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

It’s probably more about where they “ expand” to rather than how many.


19 posted on 12/22/2016 12:41:37 PM PST by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Why do the neocons/George Soros want war with Russia?
/FR meme otherwise unlikely to appear on this thread
20 posted on 12/22/2016 2:46:47 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson