So what's your theory/fantasy?
Posted on 12/15/2016 11:14:42 AM PST by GonzoII
Brought to you by Desert Diamond: http://ddcaz.com Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference on Obama Birth Certificate to be streamed LIVE this afternoon.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Sounds like O Sr married Madeline Dunham. She was known as Toot.
The article is full of errors. Maybe that’s why no serious, reputable author, such as Cashill or Corsi, took it seriously.
If the theory is that O Sr took two white wives while in America...that is just insane.
Smh.
I’m not going to read this whole thread. I assume this fizzled. Not a word about it in the news or on drudge.
Thank you. Matches up with everything that I can remember posted on the research threads.
I think peoples’ main problems who don’t “get it” are that they didn’t read all the research threads, for one. For another, many people have preconceived ideas of what happened, so try to stuff whatever fits into a box, and not everything can fit, so they twist things in their minds and reject what doesn’t “fit” into their idea of the story. Add to that some people hate to admit “I was wrong” or “I don’t know”. A bit of humility is essential of one wants to know truth, in any area of life.
A mind emptied of what people think they know is the only way to understand this.
“It’s not so much what people don’t know is the problem, it’s what they know that ain’t so.”
The main problem is that no one who believes this arcane, improbable scenario has ever put together a succinct, compelling written account and/or summation and published it. After nearly a decade of being propounded ONLY on increasingly obscure threads, the theory lacks credibility. If there were a strong, factual case to be made, it would have been done by now, and released to a larger audience. Nothing like that ever happened.
And there is a very good reason why it didn’t.
What matters is not what anyone “thinks”, what matters is the actual evidence, which Arpaio and Zullo seem to have plenty of, and they will be giving it to the feds.
I think it will all be made known, in due course of time.
This is relatively new info that has not been thoroughly gone over:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3505072/posts?page=495#495
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3407407/posts?page=187#187
Why hasn’t it?
Agree. The CCP turned up two key pieces of evidence. One, the BC is a cut-and-paste fraud. Two, someone arrived in HI from a foreign country during the week of Obama’s supposed birth whose identity, were it known, would destroy the entire narrative/myth:
‘The Arpaio report, for instance, noted that “the INS records for foreign flights arriving in Hawaii during the week of Obama’s birth were missing, not only on the microfilm reels examined, but also in the primary database itself.”’
http://www.cashill.com/intellect_fraud/will_wa_po
You need a new razor, Mark spent the majority of his childhood in the US and went to the same college as the baby-sitters son.
I don't remember seeing "Polk" directories here in the Boston area but it would seem to me that they would be published the year before, like December 1960 or sooner. What would be the cutoff date for typesetting a new address in that directory in time for printing?
I have just left a message with Polk to see if they can answer that question.
I trust conservative researchers who’ve not only spent massive amounts of time on the issue, but who have had the courage of their convictions. Jack Cashill comes to mind. He has published extensively on the subject, and he believes that at most, O Sr had one American wife. I’ll believe him 1000x over anyone who confines their activities to obscure threads, who have never published their findings, and put them out into the public arena for broader scrutiny.
Nothing in that entire article about O Sr having two American wives.
Someone named Chantal Anderson (the same name, not necessarily the same person) as appears in the U of WA records as a Deputy Registrar, wrote an article about this issue and included a page from the directory. The typed info on the bottom I gather was her contribution.
The nastiness used routinely to support the Anna Toot theory is a prime indicator that it’s false. People arguing the truth use facts and evidence. People arguing a lie use personal insults.
1961 Indianpolis
copyright, 1960, by R.L. Polk
https://archive.org/stream/polksindianapoli1961unse#page/n3/mode/2up
You are the only one that has been nasty on this thread! Get over it. Stop with your insults. Most of us here, are sick of them. Nobody likes seeing your rude comments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.