Michigan Court of Appeals: Michigan Attorney General v Board of State Canvassers

Michigan Court of Appeals ^ | Dec 6, 2016

[jonno]

Yes - unbiased he is NOT.

(The above twitter feeds are very helpful!)

[Ray76]

It does seem that way. If he does not dissolve the order then the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit likely will order him to. State law determines whether a recount occurs.

[jonno]

Wow - Stein’s lawyer admits that Stein is not an “aggrieved party”. How can the judge possible rule in their favor?

[mrsmith]

The Appeals Court has already clearly forbade him from going the route of disputing the state’s law.
He has to find something else.
Something the Appeals Court will shoot down, but not be offended by.

After all, he looks the fool for causing a pointless recount that has to be ended without completion.

[Alberta's Child]

It’s funny how it works when you get inside a courtroom. Even a lawyer whose client has no case has to tell the truth. LOL.

[GailA]

Uh Oh: Half Of Detroit’s Ballots Might Be Disqualified Due To Errors
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/12/06/uh-oh-half-of-detroits-ballots-might-be-disqualified-due-to-ballot-errors-n2256152?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

[mrsmith]

Robert Snell ‏@RobertSnellnews · 5m5 minutes ago
Judge Goldsmith: Does possible fraud and mistake make Stein an aggrieved party?
Stein atty: No

Yeah, Wow!
Judge to Stein attorney: "Please save me!"
Stein attorney: :Uh, I can't."

[bigbob]

Excellent. Thanks.

[jonno]

LOL - that is funny.

We need a live cam...

[jonno]

” Even a lawyer whose client has no case has to tell the truth”

Ha, refreshing - unlike politicians.

[mrsmith]

Now going for her only chance- keep the order until she appeals to the Mich SC.

But there has to be a good chance she’d win there for the judge to do that- and there isn’t.

[TheStickman]

Ping for later

[Voluntaryist]

ROFL!!!

Honest question, why is the legacy media not blowing this up with non-stop coverage?? Do they already know it’s doomed to fail??

[jonno]

"Robert Snell ‏@RobertSnellnews 1m Stein atty and judge debate about whether fraud involved in election. No evidence, Stein atty says, but need recount to find out" Shades of Pelosi: "we need to recount the election to find out what happened in the election" I hope the question is asked of Stein - "Where does it end?"

[Voluntaryist]

LMAO
M
A
O

[jonno]

(let me try that with some formatting)

"Robert Snell ‏@RobertSnellnews 1m
Stein atty and judge debate about whether fraud involved in election. No evidence, Stein atty says, but need recount to find out"

Shades of Pelosi: "we need to recount the election to find out what happened in the election"

I hope the question is asked of Stein - "Where does it end?"

[mrsmith]

Yeah, and that brings up a point that’s missing in this brouhaha:
Recounts don’t much ‘check’ elecion results.
That requires a contest of the election, or at least an audit.

“Robert Snell ;@RobertSnellnews · 3m3 minutes ago

Recount judge to Stein atty: Any idea if recount will tell us if voting machines fell victim to cyber attack of malfunctioned?”

Judge: “Save me, pretty please?”

[exit82]

Goldsmith is holding a dog and pony show for sh#ts and giggles.

He should have simply announced to all parties that due to the MI Court of Appeals ruling last night, the recount is over and the TRO is voided.

Any other outcome should result in his immediate impeachment and removal from office. The 6th District already has said he exceeded his authority by stating that the recount could not stop until he said so.

[jonno]

Rod Meloni ‏@RodMeloni
"...in the MI election "wholesale fraud may have ocurred..."

lol - In this, we at FR can ALL agree!

[bigbob]

And the Clintonistas in the back of the courtroom just puckered up real good at that!