Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Largest two Pennsylvania counties (both of which Clinton won) net Hillary +5 votes.
The Daily Caller ^ | 12/05/2016 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 12/06/2016 8:28:00 AM PST by Reagan80

Pennsylvania’s largest two counties completed their presidential vote recounts Monday and Hillary Clinton only picked up five votes.

According to an election official in Philadelphia County, the largest county in the state, Clinton netted five votes after its final computations. Another official from the board of elections in the second largest county — Allegheny, where the city of Pittsburgh is located — told The Daily Caller that no numbers changed after their second recount was completed.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05/pennsylvanias-largest-counties-complete-recounts-and-clinton-wins-five-votes/#ixzz4S4mYtXQk

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; 2016swingstates; clinton; election; hillary2016; pa2016; pennsylvania; recount; stein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Let's end this charade.
1 posted on 12/06/2016 8:28:00 AM PST by Reagan80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

Lock Stein up for fraud and being a public nuisance..


2 posted on 12/06/2016 8:29:35 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

If there was an honest recount of Philadelphia County, Hillary would lose 100,000 votes. Philadelphia is, hands down, one of the most corrupt jurisdictions in American when it comes to voter fraud. It may be THE most corrupt major city in America when it comes to voter fraud.


3 posted on 12/06/2016 8:30:51 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
If there was an honest recount of Philadelphia County, Hillary would lose 100,000 votes.

I don't think so, not on the count itself. The pickup would occur if there were an investigation of the validity of the voters against the voting lists. That's how the manufacturing occurs.

4 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:08 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

I am not sure but I believe Jill’s push is for a HAND RECOUNT. I realize it is just a tactic to mess up the process.


5 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:31 AM PST by boycott (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

As far as I can see....with known counts....one can certainly see the possibility of “tampering” with the election results via a recount is greater than the original vote.


6 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:36 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

There’s a reason there is very little being reported regarding the WI, MI and PA recounts. As we knew all along, the recounts are leading nowhere.

This is embarrassing to both Jill Stein and Cankles. They (and the wee-weed up media) were hoping beyond hope that there would be miraculous discoveries of votes which would flip the states to the Cankled Beast. Didn’t happen.

How embarrassing. Nothing to see here, move along, move along........


7 posted on 12/06/2016 8:33:48 AM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

Why is FrankenStein wasting our time? Someone grab the hook.

Pray America woke


8 posted on 12/06/2016 8:34:32 AM PST by bray (The Silent Majority ROARED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

The problem (for democrats) is the nearly ubiquitous electronic voting systems have made after the fact election fraud virtually impossible due to the internal time and date stamps on votes cast. That’s not to say that the democrats don’t engage in fraud, they just count on casting enough fraudulent ballots on election day, and they seriously underestimated how many they needed this election.


9 posted on 12/06/2016 8:35:31 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

In the rest of the Commonwealth they are likely to find
only Trump votes.


10 posted on 12/06/2016 8:35:49 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

“Largest two Pennsylvania counties (both of which Clinton won) net Hillary +5 votes.”

Here we go! I just KNEW it! The Dems are gonna steal the election. They’re just gonna keep recounting until Hillary is President!

Ten thousand more recounts should do it.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaaaaaaa.


11 posted on 12/06/2016 8:36:34 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20
There’s a reason there is very little being reported regarding the WI, MI and PA recounts. As we knew all along, the recounts are leading nowhere.

Which is why, in the last couple days, liberals have shifted back to their "threaten Trump electors" campaign as they realize the recounts aren't working out like they hoped.

12 posted on 12/06/2016 8:37:47 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80
"Count it again!"


13 posted on 12/06/2016 8:40:08 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80
If it's only five votes, we may end up with somebody using Jill Stein for some sort of fraud.
14 posted on 12/06/2016 8:40:09 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

They aren’t even trying. Ask Al Franken how a recount is really done. He would have picked up 300 bazillion votes by now.


15 posted on 12/06/2016 8:40:20 AM PST by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

I don’t think deep down the Democrats really wanted Hillary to win, she’s not worth the effort to them.


16 posted on 12/06/2016 8:41:01 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reagan80

Okay, Jill Stein asked for the recount; but Ms. Clinton’s vote count is what makes the news. Why? This isn’t about her, right?

Oh, wait, right. Sorry. I forgot.


17 posted on 12/06/2016 8:41:34 AM PST by HiJinx (It's Morning in America Once Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

“They (and the wee-weed up media) were hoping beyond hope that there would be miraculous discoveries of votes which would flip the states”

Actually, there’s a TON of snowflakes out there that really are believing, hoping, and praying that this is a real possibility. Now they’re gonna have to go through the process of losing (and grieving) again, which is gonna be tough because the Crayons and coloring books have all been used up, the Play Dough is a dried up mess, and the therapy dogs have already had all the fur worn off of them.


18 posted on 12/06/2016 8:41:41 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Which is why, in the last couple days, liberals have shifted back to their “threaten Trump electors” campaign as they realize the recounts aren’t working out like they hoped.


I hope that electors being threatened are reporting the threats to law enforcement. The RAT bullies need to be punished for their illegal conduct.


19 posted on 12/06/2016 8:42:10 AM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

This is what Trump should focus on fixing during his first 4 years, and he will guarantee a second 4 years. The resources of the DOJ can be pretty powerful in rooting out and demonstrating fraud, and a report on the systemic and pervasive corruption would help in the creation of national legislation that requires certain standards that can’t be sorosized. (I just made up that word). A new justice on the Supreme Court means the legislation will likely pass muster. Two new justices (Bader is hanging by a thread) will ensure that we can’t be stabbed in the back by one of the so-called conservatives.


20 posted on 12/06/2016 8:42:29 AM PST by Defiant (The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson