Posted on 11/30/2016 11:55:21 AM PST by Altura Ct.
Pull their White House pass.
Why should things change now?....
Yes! That is the medias job. They are supposed to be a watchdog of the government. They are not supposed to just parrot the official government line.it is the medias job to serve as the opposition to President-elect Donald Trumps incoming administration.
It is often claimed that journalists must be objective because of the First Amendment. That is propaganda, or misunderstanding fostered by propaganda. The First Amendment precludes the government from enforcing any standard of objectivity - and, as understood, little in the way of a standard of truthfulness. There are libel laws, but . . .In no sense does the First Amendment enforce objectivity, and there is no reason in the Bible why a Christian should assume that journalism would be objective. Journalists do claim that journalism is objective, but that is sheer propaganda. It is a self-negating claim, in that it is inconsistent with candor about any reasons why you might have a motive not to be objective. And such candor is sine qua non for anyone actually trying to be objective. It is legitimate, and laudable, to try to be objective. It is even legitimate to claim that you are trying to be objective (if indeed you are). But to claim actually to be objective is to be arrogant - and to foreclose the possibility that you actually are even trying to be objective.
If journalism isnt objective, what is the point of the First Amendment? Simply this - freedom of the press allows the possibility that the truth will be published by somebody. But of course, that depends on the existence of multiple free and independent presses. Rather than a media which actually consists of the Associated Press, and various front organizations which are distinct but not different.
People of the same trade [e.g., journalists] seldom meet together [e.g., virtually over the AP newswire], even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary. - Adam Smith, Wealth of NationsSCOTUS long ago declared the AP to be in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, but the APs mission of economizing on scarce and expensive bandwidth in the transmission of news made the AP too big to fail. The difference in the Internet era is that transmission bandwidth is not "scarce and expensive. It is dirt cheap.
Will be? WILL be?
Bwahahahahaha!!!!
You’ve been doing it already for the past 16 months or so!!!
What I am trying to say, though I am doing a poor job of it, is that the media being what they are (communists) and doing what they do (coordinated propaganda) is a big reason we can only have Republicans in public office. I would rather have themedia watching the government like a hawk while making mindless accusations and calling people racist than have them covering up government wrong doings and forcing the party line down our throats.
Your point is well taken and undeniable."The Democratic Party and the MSM is (not are, is) a single entity. Our constitutional system is dysfunctional at present because of hypertrophied faction (partisanship). The very thing that the Framers feared.
My point is that
- for business reasons journalism is negative toward American society. Just because bad news sells.
- the wire services homogenize journalism. Whereas newspapers used to be fractiously independent, they now consist of (slightly) various spins on the same input.
- the wire services exacerbate the natural tendency of journalism to claim objectivity. the claim of objectivity is self-negating because you cant even try to be objective without being candid about why you might not be objective.
- anyone, including journalists, who is negative and calls that negativity objective is a cynic.
- There is no reason to assume that both political parties would be independent of the cynical borg which is wire service journalism. And plenty of reasons why at least one party might be absorbed by the borg - leaving only the name, Democratic Party to distinguish it from the borg. Just like all the major newspapers still exist as fronts for the borg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.