Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Disarm North Korea, Wage Trade War On China
Forbes ^ | Nov 27, 2016 | Gordon G. Chang

Posted on 11/28/2016 11:01:56 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

To Disarm North Korea, Wage Trade War On China

Nov 27, 2016 @ 12:01 AM

Gordon G. Chang

To Disarm North Korea, Wage Trade War On China

/snip

Virtually every American analyst agrees on what Trump should do to meet the No. 1 threat: drop his plans of confronting China on trade to obtain its assistance on “denuclearizing” the Kim regime.

This line of thinking is not new and ignores 13 years of American foreign policy failure. In fact, it’s possible the opposite is true, that waging a trade war on China may be the only way to obtain Beijing’s cooperation on North Korea.

/snip

North Korea looks impossible to solve, and it is if we see China as on our side. It is not. But if we treat China as part of the problem, which it most certainly is, then we can begin to craft solutions, like secondary sanctions. Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, will stop supporting North Korea only when the costs of doing so are too high. So far, his country has suffered almost no penalty.

To impose costs, Trump’s administration could, among other things, cut offending Chinese banks off from the global financial system, sanction every Chinese proliferator, and impose his threatened 45% across-the-board tariff on China’s goods. He could end negotiations on the Bilateral Investment Treaty and treat Chinese businesses like Beijing treats American ones.

And Mr. Trump, starting January 20, will have the tools to raise the costs on Beijing. The Chinese will surely retaliate, but they have few effective options for a long-term struggle. After all, last year they ran a $334.1 billion trade surplus in goods and services against the United States.

/snip

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; nkorea; nuke; tradewar
Apparently Many do not want to rock the boat even if the plan is probably an only viable way to take care of the problem without firing shots. Pleading for good will and nibbling at the edge with tiny pressure will be only seen as a sign of weak hand, to which China feel no need to be conciliatory.
1 posted on 11/28/2016 11:01:56 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...
P!
2 posted on 11/28/2016 11:02:39 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Simplest solution would be to sell Tridents to Japan.


3 posted on 11/28/2016 11:07:06 PM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmm... I wonder about the wisdom of a trade war with China.

To begin with, they’re holding millions and millions of dollars in US government paper.

Then, too, they don’t really give a rat’s *ss what happens to North Korea as long as they don’t get too crazy.

And... a trade war with China when the US balance of trade is massively in favor of China?

I’m no economist, so feel free to chime in, but this doesn’t look like a solution to me...


4 posted on 11/28/2016 11:18:43 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
China needs U.S. market more than U.S. does China's. Despite their boasting, their domestic market cannot buy enough of what they produce. They have to rely heavily on export to keep their economy going.
Lately, they are blowing their money into real estate market to keep their economy from tanking. When the cost of antagonizing U.S. to keep N. Korea as an useful pit bull is going up, they have no choice to give a second look at their current policy.
5 posted on 11/28/2016 11:29:23 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

or we could just foster a war between India and China and with luck they will each suffer rather significant civilian/military casualties.

Maybe I’m just in a bad mood, . . .


6 posted on 11/29/2016 12:14:16 AM PST by txnativegop (Hey! Libturds! You got Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

LOL!


7 posted on 11/29/2016 12:24:38 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I say hit them (China ) on all fronts military, and Economic


8 posted on 11/29/2016 12:26:23 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I like Gordon Chang, but that would probably have the opposite effect.

The CCP would become even closer to NK if they were being truly squeezed in a real way.

They’re leverage has always been asymmetric and using proxies.


9 posted on 11/29/2016 2:45:55 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I am an advocate of the deployment of 100-200 IRBMs similar to the Pershing II. Put them in Korea, Japan and the PI.

China would be more than happy to fix the NORK problem thereafter.


10 posted on 11/29/2016 5:34:48 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
They use proxies because they think it is cost-effective. When it ceases to be the case, things change.
11 posted on 11/29/2016 6:46:43 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Hmmm... I wonder about the wisdom of a trade war with China.

It's something a Ronald Reagan might have been able to do in 1982. Today's China is far too powerful economically for any kind of sanctions to work. They trade with the whole world, and the USA may be still the single biggest economy but we are no longer indispensable.

12 posted on 11/29/2016 6:53:17 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson