Posted on 11/21/2016 8:31:28 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Even before her defeat for the presidency, Hillary Clinton’s departure from the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation crippled its fundraising for that “good work” we have repeatedly been assured the foundation does. Like hiring members of the Clinton machine to plot...Chelsea’s rise as a candidate for Congress.
Khaleda Raman reports for the U.K. Daily Mail:
Donations to the Clinton Foundation plummeted amid Hillary Clinton's failed presidential run, it has been revealed.
The non-profit organization's latest tax filings show contributions fell 37 per cent to $108million - down from $172million in 2014, according to the New York Post.
Donations fell as the former Secretary of State left the group in April last year shortly after announcing her run for the White House.
Her departure also meant that revenue brought in from paid speeches plunged from $3.6million in 2014 to just $357,500.
Why, it’s almost enough to make you believe that Hillary’s speeches weren’t about wonderfully entertaining and enlightening presentations at all, but rather about bribing a future president.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Look for lots of layoffs as the revenue stream dries up. They have lots of employees (COUGH!hangers-onCOUGH!)who will probably be unloaded, but not until after it is too late and the cash stream has already disappeared.
“Maybe she’ll have a sale like Penney’s.”
You can’t discount power and influence you no longer have. All the people who “donated” to her since she quit the State Department were speculating on her return to power, influence, and...worth.
They chose poorly.
coming soon.
the Obama foundation
LOL
Hillary has absolutely no power to change anything in Government so why would they still pay her $200,000+ for speeches? HAHAHAHAHA
Money for nothing and the Hen ain’t free.
Looking forward to the day the Clinton’s monthly checking account fees exceed donations.
“Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential run”
Those words give me the warm fuzzies!! Is it really less than two weeks since Election Day?
No more influence, no more payola.
Seems pretty straight forward to me....
I imagine they’ve got plenty of dark money squirrelled away.
Bill’s next paid speech is to the West Strangeville, Iowa Breakfast Rotary for #75, gas money, and all the pancakes he can eat.
They spiked the ball before they hit the end zone. They been Leon Letted.
There is still her "safe spaces" -- organizations like private colleges charging $60,000 annually. They are plenty that will be more than happy to give her $200,000 of their students' money.
I doubt she's going to need give up her favorite wines.
Bad business, bribing Judge Crater.
Erk...
Donations to the Clinton Foundation have been wiped out? You mean like with a cloth?
========================================
PODESTA EMAIL Mentions CHAI, AFL-CIO, Deutsche Bank.......indicates Podesta aided and abetted the Clinton Foundation's tax fraud and money laundering.
<><> ....(money raised for) the Island initiative budget "as is" includes a $100,000 salary for Ira (on top of his CHAI salary) and a staff of nine (that Ira said he did not need) .....
<><> ...... Swedish post code lottery donor funds (to be split among them)......
<><>....using Clinton Foundation funds to fund AFL-CIO/pension fund retrofit work.
LINK https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9938
=========================================
<><> ITEM----The legal culpability of a tax-free "charity" consists of:
<><> soliciting and taking money, and,
<><> showing how they spend it.
==========================================
REPORT MAIL FRAUD AND ELECTRONIC FRAUD HERE:
MAIL FRAUD https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
ELECTRONIC FRAUD---FBI electronic fraud unit
FBI tip page https://tips.fbi.gov
=================================
Just shut it down......its a useless shady foundation.
Moreover, the conniving Clintons used the tax-paid offices of the State Dept and classified info belonging to taxpayers to enrich themselves. Taxpayers demand reparations ..... any money made belongs to them.
Clintons are in the ash heap of history
Absolutely no influence
Obama top dog in the dem party ( second time he put it to the Clintons)
Hillary with no incentive anymore will go full blown alcoholic
Even half or more of those who voted for her hated her
Can’t wait to see the clawbacks.
Hillary hadn’t even finished unpacking her things in her new office at the State Department after Barack Obama appointed her when a situation was dumped in her lap. The Swiss government was concerned that the IRS was suing UBS AG – one of the biggest banks in Switzerland – to get them to reveal the identities of tens of thousands of clients. (Wall Street Journal)
If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court.
Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS, an outcome that drew criticism from some lawmakers who wanted a more extensive crackdown.
Well, the Swiss may have gotten off pretty easy, but at least a compromise had been reached, right? Job well done, Mrs. Clinton. Peace is maintained between the US and an influential ally. And now we can all go about our business. Except for one disturbing aspect of the story which cropped up in the following months.
From that point on, UBS’s engagement with the Clinton family’s charitable organization increased. Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according the foundation and the bank.
The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million. And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.
The WSJ is quick to point out that there is no evidence of any link between these events, but at what point does coincidence become too much to ignore? You’re talking about one of the richest, most powerful financial entities on the planet who, up until Clinton took over at state, had given a grand total of $60K to the foundation. (An amount which likely fell well short of how much USB spent on coffee and donuts during the same period.) And then, in a matter of weeks, the cash spigots opened up and increased tenfold over the next six years.
Tens of millions in loans to efforts supported by the foundation were in addition to a direct set of cash deposits into Bill Clinton’s pocket totally $1.5M… not the foundation’s coffers. And if I remember correctly, Bill and Hill were still filing their taxes jointly at the time, weren’t they?
The Swiss bank got a truly sweet deal and millions of dollars flowed immediately thereafter into the accounts of both the Clintons and their foundation. So we are asked to accept that there no causal relationship between these two sets of data points. We can’t prove that there is absent some secret recording turning up, but at what point can the media say that this beggars belief and the empress has no clothes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.