That’s it.
Most of these voters didn’t know who Huma and the Weiner were.
They know now.
She is done.
Posted on 10/30/2016 10:04:01 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This is despite the Clinton Crime Machine full court press to suppress social media.
People's Pundit Daily currently has Trump up by 1.2% yesterday, and 1.1% today.
They don't adjust for party ID, but they do publish it in the crosstabs. Yesterday, it was 41/37/22 (D/R/I), or D+4. Party ID hasn't been published for today.
Over the past few weeks, it's been D+5 or D+6. The change was from D to I, with R holding at 37%.
Don’t hold your breath waiting to see it on Lame Stream Media. Ain’t gonna happen.
Dang, I guess the WP and the NYT will now predict she’s only five point ahead. /s
Grain of salt time.
It looks like depressing us with the “Trump has 0% chance of winning!” and “Hillary is ahead everywhere by double digits!” stories didn’t work.
I wouldn’t put it past them, now, to give us “Trump is going to win!” and “Trump is ahead everywhere!” stories in order to siphon away some of our motivation to vote.
So, don’t trust anything the democrats say. Don’t trust this latest “bombshell.” Don’t trust the stories about upcoming bombshells. Don’t trust the FBI, don’t trust a word from anyone in the government and absolutely don’t trust the media.
Yep... from McMullian butt buddy Rick Wilson, and Romney floozie Liz Mair, who ran the nude Melania ad in Utah in the primaries .
That’s it.
Most of these voters didn’t know who Huma and the Weiner were.
They know now.
She is done.
She’s done.
“That’s Not The Russians”...Goddamn, that’s funny!
(Putin must laugh himself to sleep at our buffonery)..
I can beat you.
I was at 0.0000% chance, not just 0.000% chance. /s
Okay, zero is still zero at the thousandths place...
If I were to vote for her, it would haunt me until the end of time.
There’s no way I’d be a part of enabling her. NEVER!
46% are still going to vote for her? Even with 34% saying they are less likely to vote for her? Romney was right. Crooked Hillary, insane Kaine, and hack Huma will get at least 47% NO MATTER WHAT.
I don't think "Trump used a naughty word" is going to get much traction at this point, which is what it sounds like. They've tried simple slander and multiple unsupported allegations of misbehavior. They've tried taxes. They've tried "Trump hates immigrants" on a guy who's married to one. They've tried "Trump hates Jews" to a guy whose daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren are Jewish. That's all Clintonian "politics of personal destruction" and it worked fine in the 90's but it's not working now.
He does not say who it will hurt. See post 5. James Okeefe is going to release a video of hillary staffers making racial slurs. If they use the “N-word”, that would be big.
“I’m not “less likely” to vote for Clinton...I was at a 0.000% chance before the revelation....”
You and me both.
And maybe people we’ll see just WHO Huma IS and her family background and will conclude that she is the enemy and #1 advisor and confidant to HRC. Then there heads will explode with a great big WHAT?
“Frank Luntz says something big to hit Trump this week?”
What? Luntz is going to take a mammoth dump?
Who exactly are these 34%?? Are they undecided voters whom pollsters prod to see which way they are leaning?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.