Skip to comments.
10 female soldiers graduate infantry officer course, will attend Ranger School
Stars and Stripes ^
| 10/28/16
| Dickstein
Posted on 10/28/2016 6:05:40 AM PDT by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
10/28/2016 6:05:40 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
They say standards were not lowered. . . .they said.
2
posted on
10/28/2016 6:07:06 AM PDT
by
Hulka
To: pabianice
>>This whole issue has driven us to ensure that we have the right standards aligned to each occupational specialty in the Army, Wesley said. We have created a gender-neutral, standards-based training environment, where it no longer becomes a question of male or female.
It makes us better.<<
IOW, “We lowered standards. A LOT!”
3
posted on
10/28/2016 6:09:46 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Never Trump=Always hiLIARy)
To: pabianice
10 female soldiers graduate infantry officer course, will attend Ranger SchoolWhere they will either fail or get passed by getting the standards lowered.
4
posted on
10/28/2016 6:10:24 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Hulka
...and they will fail in Mountain phase or when they hit the swamps and meet Mr. Cottonmouth.
5
posted on
10/28/2016 6:10:56 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
6
posted on
10/28/2016 6:12:11 AM PDT
by
deport
To: pabianice
Well, that sounds very stylish.
7
posted on
10/28/2016 6:12:41 AM PDT
by
CASchack
To: pabianice
In the meantime, Runner’s World has an article on how cat calling women runners is intimidating to women and all men need to put a stop to it.
8
posted on
10/28/2016 6:12:56 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
(I haven't taken the 30 silvers.)
To: Hulka
The standard is staying alive and keeping those under their command in the same condition.
Glad I’m not part of that experiment.
9
posted on
10/28/2016 6:12:57 AM PDT
by
HLPhat
(It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
To: pabianice
Eventually theyll become platoon leaders at Fort Hood in Texas or Fort Bragg in North Carolina.
That presumes they qualify and stick with it.
10
posted on
10/28/2016 6:13:16 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: pabianice
I bet many will die because of these LIB social workers messing with the military training requirements. So sad that these leftist losers are doing that.
11
posted on
10/28/2016 6:14:12 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: pabianice
The article left out the part regarding how this strikes fear into the heart of Putin, ISIS and the Red Chinese.
Oldplayer
To: pabianice
We all know from NCO trainers in the camp that the women got a little more rest and food than the men.
I’m convinced they also packed out lighter.
13
posted on
10/28/2016 6:16:37 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Avoiding the Truth-Hillary's only expertise)
To: Hacksaw
Runners World has an article
Runners World has been "progressive" for a very long. I read Running Times for many years, until they were bought out by RW.
14
posted on
10/28/2016 6:18:26 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: pabianice
Wonder if any will end up with a quietly and among the officer and enlisted ranks, the whispered nickname “Wonder Woman”?
15
posted on
10/28/2016 6:18:56 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(( (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)))
To: pabianice
Why in creation would any females want to go this route ?
Betcha that they are getting $$$ under the table or behind the scenes to ‘con’ them into taking this career path.
To: Hacksaw
I wish women would catcall me. I think I’d find it flattering.
17
posted on
10/28/2016 6:19:37 AM PDT
by
FreedomStar3028
(Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
To: Hulka
I liked Heinlein's "Amazon Warriors" in "Tunnel In The Sky." The principle was that you could train female warriors to their maximum combat potential but they didn't fight the same way as the men because they were physically and mentally different. That way women who wanted to be in combat could be. They fought in separate battalions from the men and were extremely effective in the book.
Logical but politically incorrect.
18
posted on
10/28/2016 6:23:58 AM PDT
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: pabianice
I hope we have a slew of competent SGTs to help out in the field.
19
posted on
10/28/2016 6:28:09 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
To: oh8eleven
Runners World has been "progressive" for a very long. I read Running Times for many years, until they were bought out by RW. Yeah, I almost subscribed until I started seeing articles like this. The catcalling article also - get this - managed to take a swipe at Donald Trump. I'm like, what the f**k does this have to do with running? Maybe I'll post it here later.
20
posted on
10/28/2016 6:28:49 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
(I haven't taken the 30 silvers.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson