Wikileaks: we need to clean this up - he has emails from her - they do not say state.gov

Wikileaks ^ | 2015-03-07

[maggief]

From:cheryl.mills@gmail.com

To: john.podesta@gmail.com

Date: 2015-03-07 21:41

Subject: Fwd: POTUS on HRC emails

we need to clean this up - he has emails from her - they do not say state.gov

[RC one]

does this mean Obama was lying when he said he found out at the same time we all found out?

[Rumierules]

I’ve already heard the spin on this ‘The President has better things to do than check the url of those emailing him.’

[Liz]

Meet the mastermind behind Clinton’s massive email coverup
New York Post ^ | September 4, 2016 | Paul Sperry / FR Posted by bushwon

EXCERPT--Newly released FBI documents detailing theinvest igation of Hillary’s State dept emails reveal the aide who would likely follow her into the White House as chief counsel was central to a cover-up of evidence sought by investigators.

Yet despite signs, Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills obstructed efforts by investigators to obtain Clinton’s emails, the FBI invited Mills to attend Hillary’s interview at FBI headquarters as one of her lawyers.

“It’s absolutely outrageous,” J/W President Tom Fitton said. “The FBI saw massive document destruction and clear intent to withhold material evidence,” he added, “and they just ignored that obstruction, and even let her sit in on the interview.”

The smoking gun is on page 16 of the FBI’s 47-page report. It details how Mills ultimately made the determinations about which emails should be preserved before she and Clinton decided to delete the rest as “personal.” Clinton conducted both government and personal business using a personal email account — clintonemail.com — tied to an unsecured server set up in the basement of her New York home.

The FBI makes clear the procedure Mills used to sort out the emails was suspicious. Mills was the one who ordered the server host to move the emails from the server to a laptop where she could screen them. She told investigators she could “not recall” if emails with non- gov addresses were included in the transfer.

It’s unlikely they were, because an aide who helped her search told the FBI she only screened for emails sent to or from Clinton with .gov and .mil — not .com — addresses.--SNIP-- (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

=======================================

Hillary's email coverup operation and deliberate destruction of govt property was so vast, at least five State Dept govt employees, including Clinton’s top suck-up, Cheryl Mills, needed DOJ immunity deals to avoid prosecution....and to prevent Obama from being implicated.

[Liz]

Hillary's email coverup operation and deliberate destruction of govt property was so vast, at least five State Dept govt employees, including Clinton’s top suck-up, Cheryl Mills, needed DOJ immunity deals to avoid prosecution....and to prevent Obama from being implicated.

By Robert Gehl, Federalist Papers
Hillary didn't know and Cheryl Mills didn't know either (250 times)

She doesn’t recall, she doesn’t recollect. She’s not sure. She just doesn’t know. Hillary Clinton’s counsel, chief of staff (and US govt employee), doesn’t know a lot of things. She can’t remember testimony she gave. She isn’t sure if she spoke to anyone – she doesn’t remember Hillary’s email address, she doesn’t even know who might know anything. During seven hours of testimony before Judicial Watch, Cheryl Mills said “I don’t know” or some variation of ignorance at least 189 times. (Hillary didn't know 50 temes and blamed a blood clot on her brain for her forgetfulness).

Mills is clearly adept at finding ways to proclaim her ignorance. She was Bill Clinton’s counsel during the impeachment proceedings in the 1990s and has been a close advisor for both Bill and Hillary Clinton for decades.

Breitbart compiled a list of the near-200 times Mills declared how little she knows.

READ HERE http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/what-cheryl-mills-doesnt-know-could-last-seven-hours-wait-it-does

[Mr. K]

Ohhhhhhh... so they KNEW there was an issue because “he” has emails from “her”...

...and they need to “clean this up”

HEY COMEY- DO YOU SEE ANY ‘INTENT’ HERE YET???

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Forget the other ping...but the HOLY CRAP still stands ,GF!
:-). Too much multi-tasking for me today.

Bbl

[ken in texas]

I’ve already heard the spin on this ‘The President has better things to do than check the url of those emailing him.’

All he reads is the sports section in the paper. The smartest man in the room doesn't need to read the stuff his lackeys send him. /s

[dirtboy]

Now we know why Mills needed immunity. Comey made himself part of the cover-up.

[Genoa]

I’ve already heard the spin on this ‘The President has better things to do than check the url of those emailing him.’

But it shows a conspiracy to "clean this up," presumably by destroying evidence. Obama himself is a side issue.

[maggief]

PING!!!

[ncfool]

The take is all headers are stripped from the Presidents emails so he never knew the source of the email

[maggief]

[Genoa]

Forget Obama. The point is that this is evidence of intent to destroy evidence and obstruction of justice.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I said this a LONG time ago. No way she gets indicted because she would have emailed the Prez at some time or another.

They would have discussed stuff that was classified which would mean the Prez would be guilty of same crimes.

It is why no grand jury was impaneled...grand jury could see all that and run with it....

This was always about protecting the Prez....Hillary was hugging his belt buckle like Ho Chi Minh said to do.....

[liberalh8ter]

And for the last 8 years I thought Valerie Jarrett was the real POTUS, turns out it's the Clinton Foundation.

[mrsmith]

We’re to believe there’s no way for the President to know he’s communicating over insecure channels.
Hard for me to believe the system allows him to inadvertantly reply to emails unsecurely.

[Raebie]

Breaking now on FOX news.

[Flick Lives]

And the “we need to clean this up” was in response to...

“Jen you probably have more on this but it looks like POTUS just said he found out HRC was using her personal email when he saw it in the news.”

So, yes, it is a coverup.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Brainstorming only
-Unless emails went to his personal blackberry.
- Or if Huma lied when she said she did not recognize his pseudonym, meaning when they cleaned (deleted) her email, they missed one.