Posted on 10/23/2016 10:09:32 AM PDT by oblomov
Re: POLITICO Playbook, presented by Boeing – DIG-OUT EDITION – EXCLUSIVE: Hillary prepares to run against Trump! DAVID BROCK ‘now thinks Hillary will face The Donald,’ and that he’ll be tough – TRUMP PLANS outreach to African Americans – B’DAY: Eric Schultz
From:ntanden@gmail.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-01-24 13:07
Subject: Re: POLITICO Playbook, presented by Boeing – DIG-OUT EDITION – EXCLUSIVE: Hillary prepares to run against Trump! DAVID BROCK ‘now thinks Hillary will face The Donald,’ and that he’ll be tough – TRUMP PLANS outreach to African Americans – B’DAY: Eric Schultz
I truly believe he's an unhinged soulless narcissist. Because I'm not actually a conspiracy theorist like David Brock.
Though given Hillary's conspiracy theories - she would probably get some doubts if the Manchurian candidate idea was raised.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:55 AM, John Podesta wrote:
> Do you really believe that or do you think he's just an unhinged
> narcissist? >
>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Neera Tanden wrote:
>> David Brock is like a menace. I can think of no worse message for
>> Hillary right now than she's preparing for the general.
>> I continue to believe he's the manchurian candidate of the GOP - secretly
>> out to tank her.
(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...
It will be interesting to see if there is any communication between nevertrump and Podesta or Tanden. The current Podesta emails stop on March 21, but evidently WL has emails after that date that they will be releasing soon.
It seems Democrats don’t know what the term “Manchurian Candidate” means. I don’t blame them as it hits too close to home.
Be very careful. This looks to be hard evidence of the main conspiracy.
Both of you are doing exactly what the establishment would want you to do—helping to sweep it under the rug.
This is not Breaking News.
It’s rambling gibberish of zero consequence.
This email looks to me like the Clinton team was worried they didn’t have the gop 100% bought.
And that Trump was somehow being used by the faction of the gop that hadn’t been fully bribed to accept the plan to get Hillary elected.
This is dated at the time Trump’s steady level of support had swollen and was surging. The point at which strategists were realizing Trump could be the nominee.
Trump has negatives, but 94% of Americans have a negative view of the main stream media. This was the biggest miscalculation for democrats. The cheers for Trump are never louder than when he’s taking swipes at the Democrat sycophant media. Trump turns their greatest advantage into a detriment.
What would hurt Hillary is the idea floated by Brock that she’s preparing for the general [because it’s rigged against Bernie.]
Could it be possible that none of this has happened?
That Hillary has not tried to influence, as deeply as she can, the gop to get her into the oval office? Or that the establishment more broadly hasn’t been manipulating the system in their favor?
You know the answer.
So who cares about making an accurate list of which individuals are involved. When your garden is overgrown with weeds, you don’t sit there and identify genus and species for each weed. You merely get rid of the problem on a broad scale.
To understand the extensive nature of the corruption of the system we need to think broadly. Bribery is only one method used. So I use the term bribery to be representative of all methods.
That was a serious question, ma’am. Not rhetorical at all.
I’ve been trying to find the secret alliances and it looks like Tanden just saved me more research, but who on our side *isn’t* allied with the Uniparty?
“This stuff is useless.”
I disagree—this is an important post, particularly when placed in the context of what we know from the other Podesta emails.
It is part of a pattern of attempting to rig the game—and there is a probably a Yuge backstory we don’t know yet.
The truth doesn’t usually fall into your lap like ripe fruit.
You have to earn it!
Your use of “ma’am” proves two things:
1. you know I’m a male
2. you’re not serious
Excellent post.
Part of rigging the system is to fool others into going along with it.
Yeah-probably about Brock.
He wrote anti-Clinton articles for the American Spectator before he joined the Hillary team, and apparently they are suspicious of him.
But—there may have been a Freudian slip in there as well—because the Clinton team does start frothing at the mouth whenever they discuss Trump.
(That has been a weakness of the campaign, btw. They are having trouble staying on message against Trump. In case you are wondering what Hillary’s message is supposed to be—ha!—see, you don’t know!—it is that she is experienced, honest, on the side of the American people, and will fight for women as the first woman President. However, she has ignored her handler’s advice to stay positive and has gone into hysterical attack mode through her mass media lackeys, and that has obscured her message. Think about all the media commentary about the election—ninety five percent of it is either Trump and women, or Hillary crushing Donald in the polls. That is not her message—that is a tactical error.)
And speaking of rigging by the leftist establishment and their minions, what really gets me is how they think they’re outsmarting everyone. But the means of “outsmarting” is deception.
In other words, one of the greatest deceptions occurring on a meta scale is that so many have been deceived to think lying is the highest measure of intellect.
14yrs here and I break a 6mo self-ban to ask you that... I’m dead serious.
Fourteen years could mean nothing, or it could mean you’ve been a faker all this time.
Ok, sorry I bothered you. Figure it out myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.