Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rb22982

I really dont understand these polls, most of the other polls are the opposite. Either the polls are complete junk, or we are being deluded.
hell 538 has her WAY ahead :(, i know that isnt a poll but thats a damn big spread. At least if it was 60/40 or something you could say ok good shot MOE or something...


38 posted on 10/20/2016 11:35:15 AM PDT by wyowolf (Be ware when the preachers take over the Republican party...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wyowolf
538 had the same win % for Brexit as he does for Trump. Missed a lot of 2014 races too.

I think the problem with polling is multiple fold.

1) Getting the right sample. Landlines were historically the best way but now only about 60% of the country has a landline, only 7% of people respond to calls and around 30% of people lie about their intention on whether or not they will vote
2) You can take your subgroups from #1 and then forecast an electoral mix by demographic based on response from #1 but that typically assumes turnout similar to the last couple of elections which may or may not be the case.
3) Internet polling - same issues - you have to have the right email database of a representative sample, get those people to agree to take the poll and then weight them proportional to your expected demographic turnout.

That doesn't even count issues like the Bradley effect among others. It's an art as much as it is as science.

40 posted on 10/20/2016 11:50:33 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson