Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Morning After: What All Newspapers Are Leading With After Last Night's Debate
ZeroHedge ^ | October 20, 2016

Posted on 10/20/2016 4:34:12 AM PDT by Zakeet

Ultimately last night's third and final presidential debate boiled down to just one brief exchange between Donald Trump and Chris Wallace, the one which all newspapers are leading with today: “What I’m saying, I will tell you at the time,” he told moderator Chris Wallace when asked if he would honor the results of the election. “I will keep you in suspense.” According to the WSJ, that response was "unprecedented and will be the answer for which this debate will be remembered."

Sure enough:

'Threatening to upend a basic pillar of American democracy' pic.twitter.com/rEnL3gjugF
— Ted Bridis (@tbridis) October 20, 2016

As AP lead with a story that will be carried across much of America's newspaper this morning:

Threatening to upend a fundamental pillar of American democracy, Donald Trump refused to say Wednesday night that he will accept the results of next month's election if he loses to Hillary Clinton. The Democratic nominee declared Trump's resistance "horrifying."

Trump's assertions raise the prospect that millions of his supporters may not accept the results on Nov. 8 if he loses, thrusting the nation into uncharted territory. Free and fair elections, with the vanquished peacefully stepping aside for the victor, have been the underpinning of America's democratic tradition since the country's founding 240 years ago.

While Trump carried himself well, and according to most commentators delivered a far better debate than his previous two appearances against Hillary, being constantly on the attack and managing to integrate the Wikileaks releases as part of his remarks, for the mainstream press just one thing mattered:

Donald Trump’s refusal to say that he will accept the presidential election’s outcome overshadowed all else during his third debate with Hillary Clinton, in Las Vegas on Wednesday evening.

While Trump's phrasing could have been better, and perhaps he was inspired by the recent revelations of vote rigging, brutally no one in the political world argued that the GOP nominee would benefit from the move. Trump’s remarks, he told moderator Chris Wallace, “I will look at it at the time” and “I will keep you in suspense”, stood in sharp contrast to recent comments from his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, and even his daughter Ivanka.

Perhaps he could have phrased it better, referring to the infamous 2000 recount of Florida votes, and Al Gore dissatisfaction with the initial outcome of that election, or even noted that "under extraordinary circumstances I may reassess", but he did not do that, and instead did what Trump is best known for doing: going a response not couched in political rhetoric.

His stance sent shockwaves through the Republican Party, where criticism of Trump was already running high. Sen. Jeff Flake quickly tweeted that Trump’s position was “beyond the pale” while Sen. Lindsey Graham released a statement asserting that Trump was “doing the party and our country a great disservice by continuing to suggest the outcome of this election is out of his hands and ‘rigged’ against him.”

Even Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway tried to find an escape route from the position her candidate had enunciated, telling CNN moments after the debate ended that “Donald Trump will accept the results of the election because he will win the election.”

For better or worse, Trump’s stance erased any final doubt that he would remain the same candidate he has always been, one who stands defiantly outside the parameters of normal political discourse: a candidate who is at odds with the establishment in every way.

* * *

Perhaps it was a calculated move setting him up for a contentuous November 8, or merely he tried to solidify his core base - which according at least to the latest polls (skewed as they may be) will be insufficient to win Trump the election - but based on the mainstream media's kneejerk response which still has a huge impact in setting the public mood, it will be difficult for Trump to reach out to independent voters who still are undecided less than three weeks ahead of the election, and whose support Trump urgently needs.

Not surprisingly, a CNN/ORC poll in the immediate aftermath of the Vegas debate found 52% of debate watchers thought Clinton was the winner, compared with 39% who picked Trump, even though CNN once again admitted the respondents once again skewed Democrat.

Among other things, on Wednesday evening Trump reiterated his plan to build a wall along the U.S-Mexico border, promised to deport “some bad hombres” and assailed Clinton as “such a nasty woman.” But the effectiveness of Trump’s approach looks much more limited with the general electorate than it was in the GOP primaries. Trump trails Clinton by about 7 percentage points in national polling averages and also lags in the battleground states. Some places that are normally Republican redoubts look competitive this year, including Arizona, Georgia and perhaps even Texas and Utah.

* * *

The debate was the last big set piece of the campaign, a TV audience of 60 million or more was predicted, and it was not without some strong moments for Trump. He pressed Clinton again on her positions on free trade and sought to make a broader argument that she was part of a political status quo that was stale and dysfunctional.

“I say the one thing you have over me is experience, but it’s bad experience,” he told her.

Trump also seemed more sure of himself and comfortable in the environment than he had in their previous encounters. Seeking to defend his immigration stance, he reminded Clinton and the audience that “millions and millions of people” had been deported during President Obama’s tenure. He also complained that the president’s signature healthcare law had resulted in “bad healthcare at the most expensive price.”

As the debate moved on, the relatively restrained Trump of the debate’s opening stages gave way to a more dissenting and fractious candidate as time wore on. Trump denied any relationship with Putin and said he would condemn any foreign interference in the election. But he notably declined to back the intelligence community's assessment that Russia was involved in the hacking of Democratic organizations. The Clinton campaign has said the FBI also is investigating Russia's involvement in the hacking of a top adviser's emails.

The businessman entered the final debate facing a string of sexual assault accusations from women who came forward after he denied in the previous contest that he had kissed or groped women without their consent. That Trump denial followed the release of a video of in which he's heard bragging about exactly that. Trump denied the accusations anew Wednesday night, saying the women coming forward "either want fame or her campaign did it."

Trump pressed Clinton on immigration, accusing her of wanting an "open borders" policy, a characterization she vigorously disputes. The Republican, who has called for building a wall the length of the U.S.-Mexico border, blamed some "bad hombres here" for drug epidemics around the country, and promised "we're going to get 'em out." Clashing on trade, Trump said Clinton had misrepresented her position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, noting that she had originally called it the "gold standard" of trade agreements. Clinton shot back that once the deal was finished, it didn't meet her standards.

"I'm against it now. I'll be against after the election. I'll be against it when I'm president," she said.

* * *

Hillary had her share of moments too, issuing plenty of verbal jabs of her own. She hit back on her opponent over outsourcing, asserting that "the Trump hotel right here in Las Vegas was made with Chinese steel." In a discussion on foreign policy, she poked fun at his reality TV career, saying, "On the day when I was in the situation room monitoring the raid that brought Osama bin laden to justice, he was hosting The Celebrity Apprentice.' " Clinton also pressed her advantage when the issue of Trump’s behavior toward women came up again. The GOP nominee has faced accusations of sexual misconduct from several women amid the fallout from a 2005 recording in which he said that his fame allowed him to grab women by the genitals.

Clinton, who began the debate with a lead in nearly all battleground states, forcefully accused Trump of favoring Russia's leader over American military and intelligence experts after the Republican nominee pointedly refused to accept the U.S. government's assertion that Moscow has sought to meddle in the U.S. election.

She charged that Russian President Vladimir Putin was backing Trump because "he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States."

Hillary has struggled throughout the campaign to overcome persistent questions about her honesty and trustworthiness, only reaffirmed by the recent Wikileaks releases. In the campaign's closing weeks, she's begun appealing to Americans to overcome the deep divisions that have been exacerbated by the heated campaign, saying on stage Wednesday that she intended to be a president for those who vote for her and those who do not.

Clinton faced debate questions for the first time about revelations in her top adviser's hacked emails that show her striking a different tone in private than in public regarding Wall Street banks and trade. But she quickly turned the discussion to Russia's potential role in stealing the emails.

The candidates did not shake hands at the beginning or end of the debate.

* * *

Ultimately it was a familiar story: Trump against the world, and a candidate who - if elected - would break with most conventions expected in the president. The GOP nominee’s remarks on the election’s outcome only cemented that perception.

It remains to be seen if Trump's biggest gamble from the final debate will pay off. Casting aside the establishment in a shocking protest vote worked for Brexit. Will it work for Donald Trump too?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: debate; mediabias; msm; riggedelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Zakeet

The specific fact that no one wants to actually talk about? What if Hillary “wins” by a few percent in a number of states where Soros owns the machines? I suspect Trump has a contingency for this and I suspect Hillary’s spies know it.

If Trump lays down she is OK. If he doesn’t there gonna be problems. The REAL question, IMHO, is can Hillary be big enough to concede that fraud is not the way to start an administration and step down? NO WAY. Will Trump acquiesce? I suspect NO WAY.

Immovable object, irresistible force. I posted months ago this election MEANS NOTHING. What happens the DAY AFTER...


21 posted on 10/20/2016 4:55:29 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Actually that was a GREAT answer....because the media wold not look at James Okeefe’s voter fraud videos on voter fraud. I am sure in the next few days Trump will bring them up..and they will be forced to. Trump just played the media.......again


22 posted on 10/20/2016 4:55:38 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Man

The Florida election results were very slim with 500 or so votes between Bush and Gore. What is not generally considered is that thousands upon thousands of military absentee votes were mysteriously lost and never counted. Military absentee votes are never counted unless the election results come within certain percentages, which clearly happened in the case of Florida, Gore, and Bush. The misplaced military absentee votes were never found.

I believe had those thousands of votes been found the results would have been much different, and the opposition knowing this purposely destroyed the votes from military absentee.


23 posted on 10/20/2016 4:55:42 AM PDT by Clutch Martin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The newspapers are still under the illusion that anyone cares what they say.


24 posted on 10/20/2016 4:57:47 AM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The question was a setup from the gitgo. It was designed to put forth a narrative that the MSM could use to derail all of the Project Veritas and Wikileaks fallout.

And how do we know it was a setup? Because the same question was not asked of Hillary. It was directed at Trump and ONLY Trump.

25 posted on 10/20/2016 4:58:07 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Just because Bernie accepted losing to crooked Hillary and a rigged system doesn’t mean that Trump will or should.


26 posted on 10/20/2016 4:58:24 AM PDT by proudpapa (Trump 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia

True, but most voting now are so committed to one of the candidates they wont change. The ones wavering not so much in a hurry.


27 posted on 10/20/2016 4:58:41 AM PDT by muskah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I’m glad TRUMP said it. It will make voters aware of voting fraud.


28 posted on 10/20/2016 4:59:14 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
If Trump said that he'd accept the results, the MSM would say that his claims of a rigged election are just political posturing and that he doesn't really mean it.

"Trump Acknowledges that Election is Fair, Will Accept Results"

29 posted on 10/20/2016 5:01:51 AM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

’Threatening to upend a basic pillar of American democracy’


The pillars of American Democracy has been rotted out by entrenched elites and their termites in the press.


30 posted on 10/20/2016 5:02:36 AM PDT by Flick Lives (Voting Trump. It is not just a vote, it is a chance to burn down the rotten Uniparty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

After the Veritas tape detailing how fraud was done, how could anyone EXPECT DJT to say anything different.


31 posted on 10/20/2016 5:03:41 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
In lock step unison


32 posted on 10/20/2016 5:03:48 AM PDT by Pollard (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Since no one reads newspapers anymore .....
Who cares .


33 posted on 10/20/2016 5:03:55 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Surely they don’t expect that we have forgotten All Gore? That guy conceded and then un-conceded, and the circus went on for weeks.


34 posted on 10/20/2016 5:05:11 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Egg McMuffin might actually carry Utah, but Hillary winning TX,AZ, GA are someone’s wet dream.


35 posted on 10/20/2016 5:06:52 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

“Military absentee votes are never counted unless the election results come within certain percentages”

I agree with most of your assessment except this. These votes, when they’re not mysteriously “lost” are counted, as are all absentee ballots, whether the national race was close or not. Why? Local elections and amendments. A few votes can and do change the outcome of small, local races.


36 posted on 10/20/2016 5:12:39 AM PDT by LNV (It's not a theory if they're really conspiring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

All I’ve been hearing is the “trump refueses to accept election results” meme and how it totally destroyed him. Even on conservative media.

I liked Trumps answer, though I think it could have been phrased better. That’s OK, he’ll do that after the debate.

But the interesting thing is that he is actually being hammered for something he didn’t say. He made the argument that he can’t make that call until the event happens. i.e. if it SHOULD be contested, he will contest it. Who wouldn’t?


37 posted on 10/20/2016 5:13:14 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

He probably will. But why should he commit an answer to such a foolish question?


38 posted on 10/20/2016 5:16:33 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The following video shows exactly why Trump is wise is saying he won’t just unconditionally accept the election results. For those who do not know how easily electronic vote counting machines can be rigged, this is a must see video.

http://dennismichaellynch.com/really-happening-votes/


39 posted on 10/20/2016 5:17:04 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/voters-poll-concern-election-security-photo-id-laws-fraud

I usually agree with Zerohedge, but this time they’re wrong. This is not going to hurt Trump. Almost 2/3 of voters agree with Trump that the election could be rigged. And that is from a You Gov poll, which is not exactly Republican-friendly.


40 posted on 10/20/2016 5:17:25 AM PDT by LNV (It's not a theory if they're really conspiring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson