Posted on 10/20/2016 3:27:38 AM PDT by nikos1121
Edited on 10/20/2016 8:24:45 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Amber Lee -@AmberKTVU -
Man finds nearly 100 voter pamphlets dumped in recycling bin @berkeley. Federal investigation under way #ktvu@10:30p
Many people aren’t listening to the press and watching the many ads on TV as Donald mentioned. Several of my relatives how have voted Democrat were tired of the Hillary ads 6 months ago. They have been Trump supporters for that long. So one has to wonder how many more people are sick and tired of those ads and are going Trump?
Does “voter pamphlet” = absentee ballot?
Good morning, adorable deplorables :)
Thanks for the thread and for breakfast!
I hope Trump is planning on running some damning ads against Hildebeasts emails, Veritas tape and her nonstop debate lies.
Using my touch screen they look like absentee ballots.
I’m wondering the same thing.
So we have women and “people of color” to blame for Democrats. No wonder Dems pander to both shamelessly.
And I guess the men in OR and WA are hopeless.
Man makes #disturbingdiscovery @berkeley-nearly 100 voter pamphlets dumped into recycling https://t.co/Aw7BjkN5NQ #ktvu— Amber Lee (@AmberKTVU) October 20, 2016
Interesting and telling!!
,h4> It's just plain weird.
Good morning and you are welcome.
I think those voter guides are from CA. they look just like them the size of a small DAMNED phone book!!!!
Scarborough is right.
All leftists do is whine about vote rigging. pic.twitter.com/5u2sURqLfG— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 20, 2016
Reading down the thread I SEE they were from CA. they are voter guides BUT they also have the persons polling place on the back of the cover so it does tell the person where to go vote!!! There are SO MANY propositions in CA. the DAMNED voter guide is the size of a small phone book, this was done by a mail person BET ON IT!!!!
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
Most embarrassing botched denial ever. https://t.co/B23QNaqq74— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 20, 2016
I think it is just the voter guide. You can see the pdf version online.
http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/en/pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.