Posted on 10/19/2016 10:19:07 PM PDT by Az Joe
Wait! Who was the last candidate to refuse to accept the result on Election Day!
Just cause Bernie Sanders accepted losing a rigged contest to crooked Hillary... doesn’t mean that I will be so agreeable. Is what Trump should be saying.
“Nice old lady”?
At least as far as the MSM is concerned. :p
Senatorial, some other clown from Min.
They will accept them only when they win. Till then they'll keep counting till they do.
I'm going back a way, but many democrats didn't like the result in the 1860 election either:)
-PJ
Why?
They wanted him to promise not to give them trouble after they screw him.
Good analysis...
Trump not saying that he would accept the final decision of the election was silly. If he loses is he going to chain himself to the front gate of the White House?
Now, let’s give Hillary some credit here.
We now know from the Podesta emails that Obozo stole the nomination from her in 2008.
Since she was a wonderful person and a patriotic American (who didn’t want to be accused of being racist—tee hee) she accepted the “results” without protest.
2000 and 2004, both Democrat candidates denied Bush an election night victory speech.
And Al Franken stole his seat in Congress (and the Democrat leadership of the Senate).
I was crowing that last night..
Al Gore , Florida.
Both Trump and Wallace missed that one.
Hillary also spouted conspiracy theories from the floor of the Senate in February 2002 when she declared BUSH KNEW in advance about the 9-11 attack.
I liked his answer - leaves him openings to highlight all the cases of voter fraud and current investigations - along with the DNC collusion.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Clinton Campaign Chairman and Chief Strategist Support Photo Voter ID
Are the Clinton Campaign Chairman and Chief Strategist horrible racists bringing back Jim Crow laws? I don’t think so. But I do think they told the truth about photo ID—which they can support in certain instances—in emails to each other revealed by wikileaks.
Two excerpts are below. First from Joel Benenson, strategist to Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, and Chief Strategist to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign:
I do think we should explore ways to Co-opt GOP’s argument for photo ID which has enormous appeal. Even among some Dem voters.
Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta replied supporting Photo ID to vote:
On the picture ID, the one thing I have thought of in that space is that if you show up on Election Day with a drivers license with a picture, attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.
This completely puts the lie to the Democrat argument that photo ID is racist. Unless you believe top officials of the Clinton campaign team are racist.
It further shows how the attacks on voter ID laws are really political. Both an effort to turn a losing issue into a winning issue and to scare minorities into voting for Democrats.
Marc Elias and everyone else should immediately withdraw all their lawsuits against voter ID as it is not racist or discriminatory according to their parties’ campaign leaders.
http://thereplawyer.blogspot.com/
GOP opponent calls for Schakowsky’s resignation in light of undercover videos
Illinois Review ^ | October 19, 2016
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3482709/posts
Now we know...
Community organizing = voter fraud
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.