Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems

[Jim Robinson]

Why in the hell do we have 17 security agencies?

With all of these security agencies guarding us, how in the hell did Russia (or anyone else) break in to our government servers? Are these agencies incompetent or what?

And in particular, why was our state department's servers so vulnerable to hackers?

Is this a sample of how a president Hillary will secure our nation's secrets?

[libertylover]

why was our state department's servers so vulnerable to hackers

I don't know, but of course it was her private non-secure servers that held the secret and top-secret emails.

[butterdezillion]

And some of the same agencies that deleted information on “known terrorists”?

[Sidebar Moderator]

Also Trump is correct: Nobody has proved that Russia did the hacking.

Bingo.

[GOPJ]

If all 17 “know”... how come not one of ‘em will come forward as a named source? Maybe even offer a little proof...

[Talisker]

Not enough info. But someone’s playing a game that could start a nuclear war. And the only people who would push that, or benefit from it, are the Democrats. Hillary is pushing a no-fly zone, and refused to state at the debate whether she would attack Russian planes that violated it. Well if she didn’t, then it wouldn’t be a no fly zone. She also personally insulted Putin tonight by accusing him of being behind Wikileaks.

Hillary wants a nuclear war with Russia. As president, she’d use that to declare martial law. That’s her goal, IMHO.

[AC Beach Patrol]

And of course the head of all intelligence is ODNI James Clapper. Remember in December 2010 when Dianne Sawyer asked Clapper about the arrest of a dozen Islamic terrorists in London six hours prior. He looks around to his aides and they had to tell him about the arrest earlier that day. The Office of Director of National Intelligence was clueless about an arrest of a dozen terrorists in London earlier that day. Amazing. I could on with Clapper gaffes but I’d just be piling on.

[Bogie]

The hackers are only doing what Jesus would have done:”The truth shall make you free.”

[MinuteGal]

Re: 17 security agencies.....

I hope that fact-checkers in the Trump campaign are on the stick and will start blowing her litany of lies to smithereens starting tomorrow.

Leni

[Califreak]

Gorelick Labyrinth

[ptsal]

I thought state secrets were posted on Google.

[crz]

And they keep poking at them. I was going to post a vid from Youtube to reply to you, but the net is so jammed.

I was a simulation of a Nuke attack on the Emergency broadcast system.

I wonder what the hell they will do WHEN this happens? And it will, because the Russians really believe they can win and survive a war of that sorts.
Then comes Iran. They dont give a rats ass if anyone survives.

[JimSEA]

And they hacked only emails that demonstrate Hillary’s criminality. Nobody but Russians would be interested in that, imagine those meanies just want to hurt poor Hillary.

[butterdezillion]

That fits what I’ve suspected for a while. My suspicion is that Iran will be Russia’s proxy, and it may be an EMP they use. And that may be what Obama/Hillary’s owners (the Islamists) have intended all along - the reason they illegally put Obama into our White HOuse in the 2008 coup.

For their part, I think Russia would hold off if Trump won. I think the Russians are NOT on the side of the Islamists and realize the whole world would be aflame if the Islamists CONTINUE to control the US. The US is a primary creator, enabler, funder, arm-er, and exporter (and importer) of ISIS. Trump made that point well tonight, and people are idiots if they ignore that fact. Russia is not ignoring that fact.

[zencycler]

So were there 17 agencies separately investigating this, which would be incredibly wasteful, inefficient, duplication and re- re- re- (etc.) duplication of effort? No?

Then you must mean that one agency reached that conclusion and then passed a memo to all the other agencies to tell them to agree with, and to rely that info.

You know, kind of like what you did after Benghazi when you had the administration reporting that your best available intelligence was that it was all caused by an internet video.

[GingisK]

That happens to be the same number of agencies that refused to file criminal actions against Hillary. Those agencies are all anti-Constitutional frauds.

[Lady Heron]

17 security agencies??? Are some of them top secret and she just let us know about them? Why the redundancy and waste of money?

[Alter Kaker]

WHAT are the 17 agencies

I'm guessing she means the Director of National Intelligence

AND

Twenty-Fifth Air Force United States Air Force Defense 1948
Intelligence and Security Command United States Army Defense 1977
Central Intelligence Agency none Independent agency 1947
Coast Guard Intelligence United States Coast Guard Homeland Security 1915
Defense Intelligence Agency none Defense 1961
Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence none Energy 1977
Office of Intelligence and Analysis none Homeland Security 2007
Bureau of Intelligence and Research none State 1945
Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence none Treasury 2004
Office of National Security Intelligence Drug Enforcement Administration Justice 2006
Intelligence Branch Federal Bureau of Investigation Justice 2005
Marine Corps Intelligence Activity United States Marine Corps Defense 1978
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency none Defense 1996
National Reconnaissance Office none Defense 1961
National Security Agency/Central Security Service none Defense 1952
Office of Naval Intelligence United States Navy Defense 1882

[outofsalt]

Russia? Really? Not the Jooos? I was sure it would be the Jooos! Oy!

[grey_whiskers]

1) The Democrats sure are inconsistent. Remember during the 2008 campaign where they had Tina Fey make fun of Sarah Palin, saying “...and I can see Russia from my house?” (and many Democrats to this day still believe Palin really said that). And then during the 2012 campaign, the line against Romney was, “The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back” ?

Why is it the Dems are blaming Wikileaks on RUSSIAN hackers?

2) And, if the Russians DID hack the servers, the Dems are admitting that Hillary’s private server DID make us less safe. How can they protect us from anything else if they can’t even guard their own illegal conduct, even by using a secret hush-hush clandestine server?

3) And if it really WAS the Russians, why did Assange’s Internet have to get cut? That wouldn’t stop Putin or whatever he re-named the KGB, would it?

“The Russians can see EVERYTHING from my server!”

[Enchante]

SHe kept saying that and it’s a load of crap anyway. No way all of those 17 agencies have studied the hacking issue or even all have access to the raw data. ALso, I doubt there’s any real evidence of actual Russian state hackers or else John Vichy Kerry would have issued a stern “diplomatic note” by now telling Putin to knock it off. We don’t know who obtained the emails for Wikileaks and Shrillary most certainly doesn’t know jack about the matter.... she can’t even manage her own personal email properly.