On debate day, Wall Street wakes up to possibility of a Trump win (Really!?)

CNBC ^ | 9/26/2016 | Jeff Cox

[riverdawg]

“How about when Buster Douglas kicked Tyson a$$”

Now, THAT was a stunner - perhaps more so than Ali’s TKO over Liston.

[karnage]

I thought it was a mistake when Tyson got rid of Teddy Atlas.

[Pollster1]

That's primarily because even in the scenario where the Republican prevails, the greater likelihood is that he'll have to deal with a divided Congress where it's difficult to push through major initiatives.

Let them think that, but . . . Look at the numbers for the individual Senate races. The states democrats were counting on picking up are in many cases those where Trump is winning or very close. Two years ago, I expected that we would lose the Senate this year. Now, I'm thinking we are likely to keep both houses of Congress, if Trump doesn't have a real disaster (the daily "peak Trump" and "this one will stop Trump" stories don't count). That will be as big a political shock to the insiders as Trump's victory itself. I just hope and pray that Trump will be able to force the establishment republicans to back him, or that he will follow the Barack Hussein model and issue executive orders and waivers until Obamacare is dismantled.

[Lou L]

“even though Trump will win he will not have enough of a victory to have a mandate to implement his policies.”

Great point. That would be them trying to "soften the blow," trying to water down and de-legitimize a Trump Presidency.

It'll come.

[GilGil]

It is no longer up to the media to determine who won. That is a thing of the past.

[hal ogen]

All I want to hear is whispers: “What is that stain on her clothing...?

[Redwood71]

Might want to re-think that. The whole idea of how liberals operate is based upon lying, dumbing down, and misleading the voters. And it just isn’t at election time, either. Support to do the stupid things they do, and get away with, has to carry over so they can get it completed.

With Hilary, she broke numerous communication security regs while employed as Sec of State. Most of them should have meant jail. Yet she wasn’t prosecuted because of her intent? She bleached 33,000 emails that we know of, instructed her subordinates how to bypass the security system using patch and paste, she participated in the use of “talk around” to levy messages......... and demanded the use of an insecure server she lied about, and knew all this was illegal.

She made a horrible decision at Benghazi she admitted to:

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Hillary-Benghazi-emails-60-Minutes/2016/07/24/id/740235/
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/10/clinton-takes-responsibility-benghazi-attack-151022211612239.html

She also was in on another lie taking credit for the Iran “deal” that solidified the funds and trade capacities of Iran to have a nuclear weapon within 10 years, probably five. She was influential on Britain and France releasing 32 banks they had frozen that Iran was using to fund the program.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-says-she-helped-usher-iran-negotia/

Even after all this,the libs are successful in “sealing” her as the top candidate for her party? And this doesn’t even tip the iceburg.

So taking a slime ball, lying, murderous, treasonous person deep in espionage against this country, they want her to run it. And I didn’t even get into her future economic plans she has laid out that is going to destroy the economy and job opportunities.

So I ask you, Would anybody in their right mind want to support her to get in and stay in with what she is planning? Not unless they are totally misinformed or just plain stupid. And they have provided for both.

red