Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump goes big with expected $140 million ad buy
The Washington Examiner ^ | September 24, 2016 | Anna Giaritelli

Posted on 09/24/2016 8:57:46 AM PDT by kevcol

The Republican nominee's team will devote $60 million of the TV ads to local markets, including Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Maine, New Mexico and Wisconsin. The remaining $40 million of TV funding will go toward national commercials.

Trump threw down $15 million on Friday alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016elections; adbuy; trump; trumpcampaign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Regulator

Exactly.

Running ads back in July would have amounted to nothing today.

Running them in October, when Hillary has blown through hundreds of million with not effect, for weeks, is going to be the TKO.


21 posted on 09/24/2016 9:23:14 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

I doubt this is his full budget. He will run these and evaluate and use the experience on these to run more.


22 posted on 09/24/2016 9:23:37 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
Maybe. But even my 80-year-old mother in law streams Netflix and put what she wants to watch on DVR for viewing later so she can zip through the ads with the FF function.

I personally don't know of anybody who actually sits through a TV ad these days. The technology at our disposal makes it rather silly to sit through them. So I think purchasing ads on TV is a colossal waste of money. Look at all the money Jeb Bush flushed down the toilet on TV ads. I don't think I ever saw one, not even on YouTube.

Maybe it would make sense to put them on a sporting event such as NFL football or the upcoming MLB playoffs. That, I could see because most people will watch these live.

23 posted on 09/24/2016 9:24:30 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (It is a wise man who rules by the polls but it is a fool who is ruled by them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

California is a long shot. Stupid to spend money on ads there.


People like Trump are motivated by the challenge............


24 posted on 09/24/2016 9:27:41 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

25 posted on 09/24/2016 9:28:49 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

For some unfathomable reason, my mother is addicted to CNN.


26 posted on 09/24/2016 9:29:34 AM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

“Right on time. Putting his money down when it will do the most good.”

Trump spends his money wisely.


27 posted on 09/24/2016 9:30:26 AM PDT by Parley Baer (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Every sports bar in the country will be playing Trump ads during game this fall. If you aren’t one watching them you’ll be hearing others talking about them.


28 posted on 09/24/2016 9:31:41 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Bill and Hillary for ADX Supermax!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Good timing and location selection. I approve.


29 posted on 09/24/2016 9:32:07 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Perhaps neither you nor I bother with commercial television much but plenty of people do. And a large purchase of air time through the networks nationally and stations locally will have several effects. One, it generates publicity on its own and helps continue Trump's dominance of the news cycles. The news media will talk about the ads and in disparaging them they cannot help but multiply the exposures. And two, it will make the opposition even more nervous and off balance (pun intended) than they already are.

Making his opponents apoplectic with rage and prone to stupid errors is a tactic that served him well during the primaries. And it is very likely to work even better against a once hugely over confident campaign that now finds itself in a real fight. Clinton has been known to fly into Hitler-like profanity laced rug chewing rages and Trump's just the kind of guy to exploit that sort of weakness.

30 posted on 09/24/2016 9:32:07 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck

I guess California is not in play after all. I didn’t see it on the list.

________________________________________________

I’m surprised VA in not on the list. Why blow money in CA?


31 posted on 09/24/2016 9:33:36 AM PDT by HenpeckedCon (Hooorah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eekitsagreek

I think Illinois might actually be in play this time. Rahm is almost universally despised in Cook County. I don’t think he’s going to be able to get people to the polls this year. Not like Daley could anyway.

L


32 posted on 09/24/2016 9:35:51 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Well if you are going to run TV ads, it makes most sense to run them during live events (like football, playoff baseball) where millions will be watching in real time. I agree on the bars and taverns. That’s where this cable-deprived Freeper goes to watch a ballgame. Trump ads would do well in the bars and taverns. Not so much on prime-time shows that everybody DVRs and watches later commercial free.


33 posted on 09/24/2016 9:36:36 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (It is a wise man who rules by the polls but it is a fool who is ruled by them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LS

“Earlier it was $100m. Now it’s $140m?”

That’s it, Trump is finished! You cannot believe anything that comes out of the Trump campaign. First it’s $100 million and now it’s $140 million. Well which is it? If they’d only tell the truth in the first place!


34 posted on 09/24/2016 9:37:27 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Bill and Hillary for ADX Supermax!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Unless he truly creates a ad for the ages or he reveals something really shockig i doubt it will change anyone’s minds.

Although, i remember reading somewhere that if you think advertising doesn’t work than why is Moxie no longer a household name?


35 posted on 09/24/2016 9:40:10 AM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck
I guess California is not in play after all. I didn’t see it on the list.

There isn't enough time left for the massive vote fraud prosecutions necessary to put it back in play. Maybe by 2020.

36 posted on 09/24/2016 9:40:21 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Better late than never. Hillary has dominated the adds for too long.


37 posted on 09/24/2016 9:47:26 AM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep
Although, i remember reading somewhere that if you think advertising doesn’t work than why is Moxie no longer a household name?

As the old ad buyer used to say, "I know that half of my advertising budget is wasted. I just don't know which half".

38 posted on 09/24/2016 9:50:12 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Clinton took a gamble that by spending a lot early, she could trounce Trump before he even got out of the gate.

That strategy worked in 2012 for Obama vs. Romney. Why not repeat it?

One big reason. In 2012, Obama was the celebrity who got all the free advertising. This time around Trump is the celebrity who got the free advertising - admittedly some of it was not favorable, but much was and so he was willing to take the bad with the good. The bad media that he couldn’t control came in the summer when no one was paying attention. He held back the money so he could set the narrative at a time when people WERE paying attention.

Meanwhile, Clinton blew through money like a drunken sailor. Her donors are tapped out and with her victory uncertain and questions about her health, they’re going to be reluctant to cough up more. She is no help to down ticket candidates and party money will have to go toward propping her up rather than aiding in the close down ticket races.

If Trump does indeed win, which he has a good shot to do, the whole history of political campaigning will have been rewritten. It may be a long time before a long time political insider heads a national ticket again and that would be a huge improvement for the body politic.


39 posted on 09/24/2016 9:50:22 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck

CA and NY are huge markets and ad buys are expensive. No need to waste a dime in those states. Target the money toward the few states that will put him over the top.


40 posted on 09/24/2016 9:53:00 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson