According to these idiots my little rescue dog would be much happier in her prior life as a manged up, flea infested pup living feral in a hole in the ground instead of clean, warm and dry with anything and everything she wants or needs.
The intelligentsia of this country has found being controversial is more profitable than being smart.
My little Yorkiepoo lives like a princess. She sleeps on my bed which has a fluffy blanket folded 4 times next to me. She sleeps on it and nearly disappears into the soft folds of the blanket. I call her the Princess and the Pea.
I’ve thought about this a lot and you guys are going about this all wrong. I think taking this argument seriously could be destructive for liberalism on several counts. For one, if it’s a real question, then liberals who love pets (which is virtually all of them) will have to confront the idea that they will be judged by history as slave owners have been. Might change the calculus on all of this white guilt that is floating around in various forms.
Taking the question seriously also forces the vast majority of people who will reject this claim to seriously articulate “well why not?”, which forces them to adopt a pretty nonegalitarian view of the world.
Just another liberal moron hating animals.
Moron.
My dog kisses my ring finger because he knows my love has no bounds for his care and I will do anything for him.
Truth is I feed him, praise him, share my ice cream cone, brush him, clean up after his poop, take him to the doc, let him out in the middle of the night when he has to go.
Who is the slave?
I’m currently sitting on an uncomfortable dining room chair because my cat had taken over my very comfortable ergonomic computer desk chair.
I pamper my dogs, feed them, clean up their poop, pay their medical bills. Who is the slave?