Posted on 09/21/2016 12:37:30 PM PDT by xzins
I agree with you. This guy has fire in the belly, and they’re not going to pull that noise and get away with it.
Clinton up by 6 in 4 way, 7 in 2 way. Has to be an outlier- though I don't see internals yet
As far as I’m concerned, if the number of votes coming out of a precinct is higher than the number of people registered in that precinct, that precinct’s results should be invalidated.
There is no excuse for that at all. I can’t fathom a situation where you would have overvotes without rampant fraud.
I’ve seen undervotes (sometimes people want to leave a particular ballot blank) which is fine, but overvotes are very fishy.
Our samller Texas cities can keep it up for some time. The 7 largest Texas cities, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Austin, Fort Worth, and El Paso only account for 25% of the total estimated TX population of 27,469,114. Each of those cities. They’re not all Blue Fortresses.
Don’t worry. The Democrats have centralized voting. You don’t even need to show up - your precinct captain will vote for you.
Remember 1980...Reagan was down by nine points (according to Gallup) in mid-October.
The result: Reagan won by 10 points - a 19 points swing in just three weeks. That just doesn't happen. Reagan was well ahead the whole time but the media just couldn't bring themselves to report it.
Here is a cover of TV Guide the week of the election. Even then they were projecting a horse race. A three way horse race!
Which is exactly why I worry. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.