Posted on 09/21/2016 4:17:56 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Let me offer a few paleopsychological observations at this juncture:
First, it is a medical and scientific fact that stress is powerfully correlated with the causes of a wide range of physical and psychological pathologies, and it can also aggravate just about any pre-existing condition. Moreover, chronic and prolonged stress of the kind plaguing Hillary is especially problematic, and it is reaching a fever pitch as her polls sink and the debates are days away. I am amazed that she has not completely fallen apart already.
Second, traumatic and unexpected events contribute to stress, and Hillary never expected to meet Trump, of all people, on the political battlefield. Surely, she would face an establishment Republican “nice guy” like “low energy” Jeb or a chin-quivering John Kasich, and she could trade intellectual barbs, if required, with Ted Cruz. And maybe she might luck out and have an all-girl gab fest with Carly Fiorina – but Donald Trump, never. I don’t think she has ever fully recovered from the shock of the Trump nomination.
Third, our species’ history and our human nature have no place for head-to-head combat between the genders because females are simply too valuable to waste on hopeless and non-adaptive ventures. To try it is to court the worse forms of stress for the woman. There is simply no woman in the world who would have any chance whatsoever against a strong, angry and combat-ready male. Prior to being knocked out in second round by Holly Holm in a championship match a year ago, unbeaten MMA phenom Ronda Rousey bragged she could compete against male fighters. After her drubbing by Holly, it is unclear that she will even fight women again.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
A picture says a thousand (or however many) words!
f*ck this................ Will she make it to the fight? That’s the question!
She is currently due a dump thru Wikileaks courtesy of the infamous Julian (TY Julian) prior to the debate beginning Sept
something or other & it looks like to me Hitlery is between a rock & a hard place.
I loved #4 - an LOL!
“Unfortunately, this quartet of feminized girly men (Bill, Barrack, Al, & Tim) does not add up to one really tough guy. Ten of them might make one Donald Trump … maybe.”
Besides, how can you not like Donald Trump and has boundless energy at every rally, which are happening now multiple times per week? Trump reminds me a lot of Barack Obama during his 2008 campaign with its rock star-like rallies and boundless enthusiasm back then.
“Did you say Orlando? No, I wasn’t planning on visiting any of the old Soviet Republics today. Is it on my schedule?”
Love, Hillary
Yep, good points but yeeesh...do people *have* to say “gender” when they mean “sex”???
There are two sexes of human beings. Gender is a grammatical concept that, I believe, has been coopted by the left so that they can pretend that biological sex doesn’t exist.
Sorry for the mini-rant, but with a bio degree, several linguistics books, and an editorial day job it *really* annoys me. :)
+1
I confess to getting them screwed up ..
Teach us ... a sentence for each for comprehension.
And in a deep male malevolent voice, will speak Latin in reverse.
She is going to pull a Rick Lazio. She has been waiting for this moment since Trump won the nomination. Not sure if anyone noticed, but the vagina card is still in the deck.
Should Hillary win the whitehouse, we will see the ongoing
effort to feminize our men. The same thing will happen here as we’re seeing happen in Europe. It looks like the
men have been completely removed from any kind of strength
as the “immigrants” take over their countries.
Great line and NOT PC.
That applies to police and military endeavors also.
She could play the dead card, it has worked before:
http://mentalfloss.com/article/26281/4-dead-politicians-who-still-got-elected
But she is 18th level at bitching and that can force the strong angry combat ready man into an non PC bitch slapping mode.
Come on, Trump doesn’t need WikiLeaks, that’s just icing on the cake.
Reading all this ‘WikiLeaks stuff’ makes me think no one has any faith in Donald at all.
What is he going to do when he faces a real enemy? Run to WikiLeaks?
Buck up, Trump is capable of put Hillary away without outside help.
“She went down hard.”
______________________________________
So did Monica.
Who wants to look at that face for four years?
Halloween is just around the corner!
But I tend to stick to the old school definition of gender being a grammatical category (masculine, feminine, neuter): how a word is treated in a language, what endings it gets, etc. So for instance the gender of "casa" (house) in Latin is feminine. It gets all the same endings as "puella" (girl) and not "puer" (boy). Languages are full of weird cases like this, even though obviously a house is not feminine by sex.
Maybe it will be clearer why we should insist on this distinction from the Wikipedia article on gender:
"Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories.[1][2] However, Money's meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the concept of a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. "If we keep using the word the wrong way we are ratifying feminist bullcrap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.