Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Details emerge about new security clearance organization, processes
Federal News Radio ^ | September 19, 2016 5:30 am | Jason Miller

Posted on 09/20/2016 6:35:38 AM PDT by RitchieAprile

In less than two weeks, the Office of Personnel Management is expected to launch the new background investigation service to help fix the mess created by a series of incidents ranging from a lack of contractor oversight to the massive data breach affecting 21.5 million current and former federal employees.

Officials promise the National Background Investigations Bureau (NBIB) will be a much different organization than its predecessor, the Federal Investigative Services.

“It will have a politically appointed director, will be headquartered in D.C. and be a full member of the Performance Accountability Council, so it aligns with customers for increased accountability and formulation of policy. That is key,” said Jim Onusko, transition leader of the NBIB, during the INSA-AFCEA National Security Summit. “With the NBIB transition team, nothing is done in a vacuum. We work closely with the transition advisory group, including the Defense Department, the Director of National Intelligence, the Office of Management and Budget and other federal agencies. In addition, we’ve created eight new key functions for the NBIB to transform how the government performs background investigations. In addition to those eight new key functions, we also enhanced seven legacy functions to more effectively and efficiently perform those investigations.”

Sponsored content: Take our data storage survey and we'll donate to the Federal Employee Education & Assistance Fund.

Onusko said one key new function is the creation of a Senior Executive Service (SES) position to lead the Federal Investigative Records Enterprise (FIRE). This person’s charge will be to automate and digitize the NBIB’s processes.

Advertisement

OPM offered more details on the NBIB in a Sept. 2 letter to Sens. John Tester (D-Mont.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.). Tester and McCaskill wrote to OPM asking for an update on the NBIB on Aug. 23.

In the letter, OPM provided more specifics around the makeup of the NBIB. For example, along with the FIRE directorate, the NBIB also will include an Engagements and Customer Service office, which will include a newly established law enforcement liaison to promote and augment the exchange of vital electronic records, and a Business Transformation directorate, which will focus on data-driven decisions and policies to support strategic goals.

Several other interesting details emerged such as the NBIB will have 8,500 employees, including 3,000 feds and 5,500 contractors. OPM said it hired 400 new federal investigators in fiscal 2016 and plans to add another 200 in 2017.

OPM also recently awarded a contract to four vendors to support the work of federal investigators to do background investigations and begin addressing the backlog of cases.

Currently, Onusko said the backlog of security clearance cases is more than 500,000.

OPM told the senators that “secret cases are taking 105 days to complete and initial top secret cases are taking 214 days.”

Under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Congress mandated OPM complete 90 percent of all initial security clearance investigations in 40 days and the 90 percent of the initial top secret investigations in 80 days.

“FIS is also undergoing a business process re-engineering effort, which includes identification of continuous process improvements that may also ultimately result in investigative capacity and process efficiencies,” OPM stated in the letter. “The BPR team has met with the largest investigations stakeholders to explore ‘pain points’ and identify targets for process improvements. For example, improved automation in front-end investigations processing produces benefits throughout the investigation review, closing and delivery process. The BPR results will help generate requirements to inform DoD on the development of a next generation case management system for the NBIB.”

Onusko said there is no quick fix to reducing the time it takes to complete an investigation or the backlog. But OPM continues to look at a broad range of solutions, including working with customer agencies to optimize access to federal employees who need new or renewed investigations. OPM also hired back retired investigators and offered current ones overtime pay.

OPM offered few new details on DoD’s progress or efforts to develop the NBIB’s IT infrastructure.

The agency stated it would make some short term IT improvements based on its Digital Transformation Strategy.

“The initial phase of this plan is to enhance existing legacy systems currently hosted by OPM to address new critical functional, user and security requirements,” OPM stated. “Concurrently, OPM and DoD, in partnership with GSA’s 18F team, has launched a project to modernize the eApplication process and associated systems. The prototype of this modernized system is targeted for first quarter of 2017.”

Part of that work with 18F is refreshing the Electronic Questionnaires for Investigations Processing system (e-QIP). 18F issued a solicitation Sept. 6 through its agile development blanket purchase agreement to replace the 13-year-old system. OPM and 18F wants a contractor to build a front-end software application prototype of the e-QIP system using a modern technology stack, digitizing Standard Form 86 and importing existing data through an API. Bids are due Sept. 20.

OPM also expects the cost of security clearance investigations to rise in 2017 and 2018. Onusko said the 2017 pricing schedule for security clearance should be finalized later in September.

“Amongst other business process improvements NBIB will be able to deliver to its customers, in the future, NBIB expects to be able to better align pricing with the federal budget timeline,” OPM stated in the letter. “This initiative was developed as a result of structured engagements with customer agencies and is supported by a study done by DoD’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) organization in concert with OPM and key stakeholders.”

A spokesman for Tester said the senator “still has some very strong concerns about the National Background Investigations Bureau. Until he is able to meet with the bureau’s permanent director and get more specific answers about the ‘new’ entity, he remains skeptical that the NBIB will be capable of properly vetting folks who want access to our nation’s most sensitive information and locations.”


TOPICS: Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2016; backgroundchecks; charlesphalen; charlessphalen; cia; clairemccaskill; clearances; cybersecurity; fis; johntester; nbib; northrupgrumman; opm; phalen; politics; securityclearance; securityclearances; sf86
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Starboard

It was private industry that faked a lot of the background investigations a few years ago. It was the government side who let all the data out the door and didn’t tell the victims for a year and a half. No one was ever really held responsible in either case, which is the larger problem.


21 posted on 09/20/2016 7:56:02 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

I joked that my interview was a lot shorter than that of most of my colleagues (some of theirs ran 2 hours, I think I was in and out in under 15 minutes) because the feds had good files on me going back to my college days and they were just going through the motions. Or perhaps I just have a dull life.


22 posted on 09/20/2016 8:04:33 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

“Because in your world, it makes sense to have a crony capitalist with a database of CIA agents.”

No, because in my world I would prefer that people like Lois Lerner don’t exist. However, I am open. Is there another way?


23 posted on 09/20/2016 8:25:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump will win New York.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HLPhat

“LOL. Riiiiiiight....”

Did he work for anyone else other than the Clinton’s?


24 posted on 09/20/2016 8:26:19 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump will win New York.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Same thing here. Have copies of my SF86s going back to my initial investigation when I enlisted in the Marine Corps. Last one was basically a short telephone interview followed by a drop in visit by the contract investigator. Ten-fifteen minutes total?


25 posted on 09/20/2016 8:48:30 AM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Who vetted Snowden again?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-altegrity-lawsuit-settlement-idUSKCN0QO2AQ20150819

Oops!

Outsourced Crony Cluster Frack; 1 each.

Etc Etc.

NO SALE.


26 posted on 09/20/2016 10:11:29 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

>>Is there another way?

Yeah - constrain government to its declared purpose: TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS; instead of turning it into a retirement plan for crony parasites.


27 posted on 09/20/2016 10:14:21 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
“It will have a politically appointed director, will be headquartered in D.C. and..."

OK, stop right there. I'm not seeing better performance ahead.

28 posted on 09/20/2016 11:33:14 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora; Liz
So, in light of the latest rounds of denial of security clearances, is this one of our root "problem children?"

Officials promise the National Background Investigations Bureau (NBIB) will be a much different organization than its predecessor, the Federal Investigative Services. “It will have a politically appointed director

29 posted on 05/08/2017 2:12:24 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

NBIB got a new director in September 2016...Charles S. Phalen


30 posted on 05/08/2017 2:19:42 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson