Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy gives look inside futuristic $4.4 billion Zumwalt destroyer
AP via Chicago Tribune ^ | September 10th, 2016 | Contact Reporter

Posted on 09/10/2016 11:39:20 AM PDT by Mariner

The Navy gave a first look inside the stealthy and futuristic Zumwalt destroyer on Friday during the ship's first port stop at a Rhode Island naval station.

The 610-foot-long warship has an angular shape to minimize its radar signature and cost more than $4.4 billion. It's the most expensive destroyer built for the Navy.

It's headed from Naval Station Newport to Baltimore, where it will be commissioned in October before going to its homeport in San Diego. It was built at Bath Iron Works in Maine.

During a tour, the Navy showed off the ship's bridge, weaponry and mission center.

The USS Zumwalt sits at dock at the naval station in Newport, R.I., Friday, Sept. 9, 2016. The 610-foot-long warship has an angular shape to minimize its radar signature and cost more than $4.4 billion. It's the most expensive destroyer built for the Navy.

In the bridge, there are 180-degree windows and chairs for the ship's captain and executive officer to command the vessel. They overlook two gun mounts that resemble cannon barrels. The Zumwalt's powerful new gun system can unload 600 rocket-powered projectiles on targets more than 70 miles away.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: usnavy; zumwalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Imagine if you will, a rocket-assisted 4 inch gatling gun with a 70 mile range.

And what is that device on the bow, forward of the guns?

Like all modern ships, no matter the crew size, they carry so much ordnance that if they take ANY SIZEABLE hit, they cease to exist.

1 posted on 09/10/2016 11:39:20 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner
The layout and uniforms in the Zumwalt CIC are all new as well...


2 posted on 09/10/2016 11:42:39 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’ll take both purple-haired girls please. Don’t bother to wrap them.


3 posted on 09/10/2016 11:51:13 AM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Not new in naval warfare, see HMS Hood.


4 posted on 09/10/2016 11:51:43 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

>>Like all modern ships, no matter the crew size, they carry so much ordnance that if they take ANY SIZEABLE hit, they cease to exist.

But in a world of nuclear anti-ship and anti-submarine weapons, you can’t build a survivable ship. You have to build one that can overwhelm any attacker and has a formidable array of defenses. Stealth is a big game-changer.

Which is why I would rather money be spent on SSGNs than a light cruiser that they call a destroyer.


5 posted on 09/10/2016 11:54:13 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I predict terrible morale on this ship. Just a gut feeling.


6 posted on 09/10/2016 11:54:17 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
"Which is why I would rather money be spent on SSGNs..."

What does SSGN mean?

7 posted on 09/10/2016 11:56:34 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Submarine, Guided Missile, Nuclear-Powered


8 posted on 09/10/2016 11:58:27 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

Thank you.


9 posted on 09/10/2016 12:00:50 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

Or HMS Queen Mary

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/HMS_Queen_Mary_Jutland.jpg


10 posted on 09/10/2016 12:02:21 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If the Navy wants more of these, they had better hope Trump is elected. Otherwise, Madam Benghazi will use that money for "refugee" resettlement (and to dump into the clinton crime foundation).
11 posted on 09/10/2016 12:11:34 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (KAINE-Voting For Hillary Will Put American Women On Par With Women In Iraq, Afghanistan = Sharia Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

That’s going to be a wet ride in heavy weather!


12 posted on 09/10/2016 12:16:35 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

A sailor walks on the bridge of the USS Zumwalt while at dock at the naval station in Newport, R.I., Friday, Sept. 9, 2016. The 610-foot-long warship has an angular shape to minimize its radar signature and cost more than $4.4 billion. It's the most expensive destroyer built for the Navy. (Michael Dwyer / AP)

Angled sides are one thing but could they not have kept the decks horizontal?

13 posted on 09/10/2016 12:21:19 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Since this is an ocean-going craft, wouldn't the proper uniform be closer to that of the SkyDiver crew?


14 posted on 09/10/2016 12:23:29 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The pessimist in me wonders: what is wrong with it?


15 posted on 09/10/2016 12:38:34 PM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noob1999
"That’s going to be a wet ride in heavy weather!"

She may as well be a submarine.

If they can get them down to $1bil, we'll see a bunch of them.

16 posted on 09/10/2016 12:47:47 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; Mariner

It all depends upon what defensive systems are in place. I hope that there are passive systems to include chaff and laminated and/or reactive armor. Point defense systems are great, but not perfect. The systems protecting forces in Iraq and Afghanistan are good, but don’t keep everything out.


17 posted on 09/10/2016 12:53:07 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

Or Arizona...


18 posted on 09/10/2016 12:55:36 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Hillary- Time To Change the Bag...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If they deploy the rail guns, there is no explosive propellant so that eliminates the issue with exploding magazines, at least for the naval guns.

Missiles and torpedoes, not so much.


19 posted on 09/10/2016 12:59:18 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Hillary- Time To Change the Bag...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Love that show have it on DVDs think I may toss one in ttoday


20 posted on 09/10/2016 1:15:06 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson