Posted on 09/08/2016 10:37:13 AM PDT by tcrlaf
I keep praying for random acts of journalism to occur, but let’s face it - the case against her on the emails is so overwhelming and the statement by Comey is so narrow (ignored many other statutes violated) that it should be obvious that the fix is in and it will remain that way.
I think Assange could drop the biggest bomb imaginable on her and it would change nothing. Too many of (myself included) keep hoping that she will fail on her own when the best thing that could happen would be for Trump to defeat her on ideas. The media is doing everything they can to make this about personality - not platform. He wins on platform walking away.
And what about when she claimed no one died in Libya thanks to her?!
I would guess that there were four families that did not appreciate that comment.
many years ago...I think just after we went into or were ready to go into Iraq....Hillary was interviewed by Tim Russert.
IIRC, she said "It has been the policy of the Dems to take out Saddam"....(I think since 1998...)
Bubba gave a big speech in 1998 and we started bombing Iraq cuz they were violating the UN agreement permitting searching for WMD.
By the time Bush was going to Iraq, they had violated the UN "Ceasefire" 15 times.
Iraq belongs to Bubba.
All this makes it hard for me to believe that she needed earpiece advice, but I suppose it could have been a backup.
ML/NJ
Folks,this is a message to Lester Holt moderating the first debate,HANDS OFF HILLARY AND HER EMAILS AND HAMMER TRUMP ON EVERYTHING
Couldn’t they drop some dope in Donald’s drinking water? Or screw with the lighting so he looks sinister?
It was all downhill from there.
Save
Hillary can’t think on her feet (and she may be mentally ill now as well), so an earpiece means someone was feeding her lines in real time in response to questions.
Obama allegedly wore an earpiece as well during the 2012 debates.
No, I can’t find anything about Lauer working for MTV. Maybe you’re thinking of Jon Stewart?
He does however rake in the big bucks at NBC. According to wikipedia they are paying him $28 million per year!
The left is crying foul because they think Lauer’s questioning was disproportionate, but in truth he went very soft on her considering the scandals in her wake. There can be no proportional lines of inquiry between her and Trump when she is the one who has the disproportionately horrific track record of abuse, opportunism, corruption and devastation to answer for.
It's also a message to further liberal moderators to protect Hillary, demolish Trump....or die.
Leni
The much bigger point is, regardless of how Trump felt at the start of Iraq war, Trump realized much sooner than the Bushes, the Clintons, and other war enthusiasts in DC, that Iraq war was destined to be a disaster and Trump said so in the 2004 interview with Esquire magazine.
An intelligent person realizes and admits their error quickly.
Libs are attacking Lauer for not fact checking during the interview.
Well, Candy Crowley did fact check Romney during the debate with Obama, and her “fact” was wrong. But by the time she was called on her error, the huge audience of debates was no longer there.
I have to agree with Chris Wallace that it is not his job to fact check. His job is to ask questions. The answers will be analyzed and dissected to death later by media.
The criticism rings hollow because Trump does not need to answer for an off hand layman’s opinion on the Iraq invasion. He may have voiced support in 2002. But he is not responsible for the invasion, the strategy, the tactics; had no vote to authorize use of force, had no access to intelligence information, and had no oversight responsibilities. Just months after the 9-11 attacks, the entire country was united behind the principle that we had to smoke out and hunt down those responsible for the attack. A lifelong New Yorker interviewed on a New York comedy radio show voicing support for the President in the wake of a national tragedy can be forgiven in all proper context. I mentioned proportionality in my post above, the left should pay heed to not disproportionately mistake a statement of solidarity and patriotism as some kind of treachery.
Trump was a civilian, and like all of us, sold the strategy by everyone in positions of authority and with access to intelligence not just here but in the UK and Europe too. The only people truly responsible for these decisions are those in office at the time, including Hillary. And the left need to be careful lest they be called hypocrites. In 2002 some 80% of Americans supported the war in Iraq. Many people changed their minds since then. Trump is entitled to that same prerogative, as his was just the opinion of a citizen civilian. Only those in positions of power, who voted in Congress to authorize the invasion have to answer for it.
And I am not sure this line of attack on Lauer will work for the same reasons. Many Americans hold a different opinion today than they did in 2002. They probably wont judge him for changing his mind like they did, especially if he did it before it was fashionable. Only Hillary has to explain her support, her vote to use force, and moreso her continuation of the policy a decade later as Secretary of State that spread conflict to Libya, Syria, Egypt, Yemen, and ISIS, all resulting from a relentless hawkishness that actually goes all the way back to policies enacted and supported and escalated by her husband. So I think all this crying and whining may backfire. It should.
.
>> “ If so, what would be the purpose of it?” <<
Same as with Obama: Feed the idiot the words.
.
I think the reason Matt Lauer did not grilled DJT more than Killary is he knew that Trump would have destroyed him totally. BOR knows the same !!!
Good points...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.