What A Surprise, Liberal Moderators Again!

I want one debate, just one, to be moderated by the “Big Three”: Rush, Hannity, Levin. Like them or not, they are the tops of the alternate media, and should be asked to represent the millions of Americans who no longer support nor believe the lame-stream media.

61 posted on 09/03/2016 4:36:22 PM PDT by huckfillary

To: changeitback440

The mods KNOW what he’s done to a woman; and yet they; evidently; WANT to try and out smart Trump!

62 posted on 09/03/2016 4:59:40 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

They are entrenched and you can’t get rid of them.

Wanna bet?

63 posted on 09/03/2016 5:01:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

64 posted on 09/03/2016 5:09:35 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

Matt Laur, my foot.

Matt Lauer? My LORD!!

65 posted on 09/03/2016 5:14:54 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

To: Blood of Tyrants

The problem with conservative moderators is that sometimes you really have to guard against winding up with a Megyn Kelly

66 posted on 09/03/2016 5:39:53 PM PDT by Postman (Flies landing on 0re0 know crap when they see it!)

Unfortunately, these are the same conclusions I have come to after watching the underhanded Uniparty machinations carried out in full public view with no shame or worry that they will get caught being corrupt or breaking our laws or held accountable for anything. Why? Because they ARE the "authorities". Who's going to hold them accountable? Nobody.

No wonder so many Americans support Trump and the Uniparty doesn't. Because he's not one of them.

67 posted on 09/03/2016 6:27:50 PM PDT by HotHunt

This won’t be a debate with all the libtard “moderators”. More like an attempted ambush.

68 posted on 09/03/2016 8:13:31 PM PDT by EinNYC

From Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche.
“From life’s school of war: what does not kill me makes me stronger”

69 posted on 09/03/2016 10:07:50 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (It's been like a slomo French Revolution, without the tumbrils-yet!)

Probably for the same reason people take out mortgages. Its a lousy deal but its the only game in town. Trump is scheduled to come over badly in the debates, but it would look far worse if he opted out of them.

70 posted on 09/04/2016 12:07:53 AM PDT by Vanders9

Its a lousy deal but its the only game in town.

No; it's not.

71 posted on 09/04/2016 4:28:02 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

Correct. Trump has other options.

The Commission on Presidential Debates is a very official sounding title for what is actually a self-selected board of leftist propagandists.

Trump should quickly announce the formation of The Commission for Fair Presidential Debates, schedule preemptive debates which precede each of the rigged debates, with settings, moderators and formats of Trump’s choosing.

Priebus should announce that the GOP is not satisfied that the CPD sponsored debates are impartial, and therefore has endorses the alternate CFPD sponsored debates, and will participate in the rigged CPD debates only if the Democrats participate in the fair CFPD debates.

If Clinton declines the invitations, simply use the empty chair routine and pass on the CPD rigged debates.

The only possible fly in the ointment would be if no network would agree to televise the fair debates. I really doubt they would all pass on the ratings bonanza, afterall, unlike the rigged debates, the fair debates would not be competing with NFL games.

However, as a last resort the Trump campaign could just buy the time - I can’t imagine money better spent.

72 posted on 09/05/2016 7:53:30 AM PDT by enumerated

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794