Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Can’t Prove That Green Energy Projects Save Money
Washington Free Beacon ^ | August 30, 2016 | Morgan Chalfant

Posted on 08/30/2016 6:08:30 AM PDT by Cheerio

Service awarded $334 million contract for solar power without proper controls

The U.S. Navy handed out a $334 million contract for solar power without having a good way to determine whether the project would be cost effective.

The Pentagon’s inspector general recently audited three of the Navy’s large-scale renewable energy projects at installations supervised by the U.S. Pacific Command, finding that federal employees tasked with carrying out cost-effectiveness assessments of these projects did not have the documentation to back up their calculations or conclusions.

The Navy has not provided “comprehensive guidance” for evaluating the cost effectiveness of the six large-scale renewable energy projects in the region, according to the inspector general report issued last week. The Pentagon and the Navy also do not have a “formal written definition” of cost effectiveness for large-scale renewable energy projects.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; navy
What a joke with the LEFT's green energy. Remember this blast from the past?

Pentagon Cuts Military Raises And Benefits, Spends $150 Per Gallon In Green Jet Fuel 05/07/2014


1 posted on 08/30/2016 6:08:31 AM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

This sort of bureaucratic ineptitude is what bankrupt several Chinese dynasties. It will do the same to ours.


2 posted on 08/30/2016 6:10:40 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio; All

143 days until President Trump kills all the stupid F’n ideas.


3 posted on 08/30/2016 6:12:42 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

um.. because they dont.


4 posted on 08/30/2016 6:18:17 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
This sort of bureaucratic ineptitude is what bankrupt several Chinese dynasties. It will do the same to ours.

What you've said reminds me of the Marble Boat, built by the Chinese in the 18th century, and rebuilt by the Doager Empress in the 19th with funds that were intended for the Imperial Navy.

5 posted on 08/30/2016 6:18:47 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

<<< .. federal employees tasked with carrying out cost-effectiveness assessments of these projects... >>>

There’s the problem.


6 posted on 08/30/2016 6:19:48 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
The purpose is not to save money, the purpose is to make the military less effective under the pretense of going green.

7 posted on 08/30/2016 6:27:33 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Everyone already knows the answer to the question of whether or not the solar project is cost saving. To maintain the corporate welfare to the solar energy company you just don’t ask the question.


8 posted on 08/30/2016 6:33:17 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Likely the decision had already been made and they had to write an analysis to suit. Not a surprise that it lacks an appropriate performance metric; you couldn’t include one and still still reach the conclusion that had already been decided on. Better just to leave it out.


9 posted on 08/30/2016 6:33:20 AM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Whoever said green projects save money? They are all subsidized because they lose money.


10 posted on 08/30/2016 6:42:18 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The whole green military iniative is a sick joke. There is now mandatory training in green lies.


11 posted on 08/30/2016 6:44:03 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

If they saved money they would not need gummint subsidies. What these projects really are is a way to funnel taxpayer money to private companies which will then turn around and donate to the politicians that created and promoted the scheme.


12 posted on 08/30/2016 6:47:25 AM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
I recall reading about a "new, improved" jet fuel from "renewable sources," costing an order of magnitude more than standard jet fuel.

Mark

13 posted on 08/30/2016 6:56:59 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
<< .. federal employees tasked with carrying out cost-effectiveness assessments of these projects... >>>

As planned, drats those pesky IG's. I guess Odunga got confused what agencies didn't have IG's

I can hear Valjar now "you fricking jug eared moron, I told you we had State wrapped around our finger, not Defense"

14 posted on 08/30/2016 7:16:11 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
The Navy better pray that Trump gets elected so the first item he can do is get rid of Ray Mabus.
15 posted on 08/30/2016 8:14:53 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

It’s not much consolation that while China and Russia are shooting the sh*t out of us, we’ll be able to crow that the environmental impact of our rounds is lower and the social justice profile of our fags and women in uniform is higher.


16 posted on 08/30/2016 9:19:40 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
The U.S. Navy handed out a $334 million contract for solar power

Chinese manufacturers will get a big chunk of that and indirectly use the windfall to build China's military. Thanks libtards! Remember that the big city libtard concentration camps are all on China's nuclear target list. That's called energy efficiency.

17 posted on 08/30/2016 9:34:04 AM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
.... and the social justice profile of our fags and women in uniform is higher.

In a rather thoughtful move, the navy announced last week that they will no longer have urinals on several of their aircraft carriers. One of their many reasons for doing this includes potty parity.





I wonder how much had to be spent for this little social experiment.
18 posted on 08/30/2016 9:35:24 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson