Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rape That Feminists Forgot
Townhall.com ^ | August 21, 2016 | Paul Jacob

Posted on 08/21/2016 5:35:04 AM PDT by Kaslin

Rebecca Schoenkopf was just minding her own business, as “owner, editrix and publisher of Wonkette,” a blog billing itself as a “Nasty Vile Little Snark Mob,” when she “hastily” posted her commentary entitled, “Let’s Talk About Juanita Broaddrick.”

A feminist, Ms. Schoenkopf explained to her readers why raping Juanita Broaddrick, which she tends to believe Bill Clinton did almost four decades ago, doesn’t make Bill a bad guy . . . or even a bad feminist.

“To sum up, I think Bill Clinton could very well have raped Juanita Broaddrick; that it doesn’t make him an evil man, or irredeemable,” she wrote. “It doesn’t even necessarily make him a bad feminist — you know, later, once he stops doing that.”

Which calls the question: Has Bill stopped doing that?

For those who missed the 1990s, Juanita Broaddrick accused then-President Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting her in a Little Rock, Arkansas, hotel room back in 1978, when Mr. Clinton was the state’s attorney general. Friends of Broaddrick confirm that she told them about the rape at the time, and they witnessed her swollen lip. But she made no public charge for decades.

In an affidavit in the Paula Jones case, Broaddrick originally said under oath that she was not attacked by Bill Clinton. But in 1998, after being granted immunity for perjury by special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, Broaddrick reversed herself, alleging that she had indeed been raped by Mr. Clinton.

Her account was detailed in a 1999 NBC Dateline segment. “No one can objectively look at Juanita’s story and not be troubled,” NBC’s Lisa Myer recently told BuzzFeed. Myer also recalled explaining NBC’s delay in broadcasting the piece at the time by telling Broaddrick, “The good news is you’re credible. The bad news is you’re very credible.”

Fast-forward to the current presidential campaign, where the story came back into the news after presidential candidate Hillary Clinton tweeted last year: “To every survivor of sexual assault . . . You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We’re with you.”

Irked, Broaddrick tweeted back in January: “I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73. . . . it never goes away.”

What does Bill Clinton’s bad behavior or allegedly even worse behavior have to do with Hillary running for president? Certainly, she’s not her husband. But then again, she has suggested she’ll have him working alongside her handling the small stuff, such as the economy.

“[M]any people have found [Broaddrick’s] charges pretty credible. She has —there [have] also been questions of Hillary being instrumental in some kind of cover-up or some kind of pressure on her to retract those charges or to be quiet. And I have no idea what happened. I have no idea whether those things are true,” Liza Featherstone, a contributing editor at the ultra-liberal The Nation, recently said to Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! “But I actually don’t think that those things should be dismissed. I think, you know, how a woman in power treats a much less powerful woman, who has accused a powerful man of raping her, actually is important.”

You don’t say.

Elsewhere, the media reaction has been tepid. When Donald Trump referred to the former president as a “rapist,” NBC News originally reported that Broaddrick’s accusation had been “discredited,” only to abandon that claim when confronted. Perhaps BuzzFeed’s Katie Baker is correct in arguing that “the political implications of her claims are too disastrous for liberal politicians and pundits . . . to rally around her, especially this close to election day. That means only Clinton-hating conservatives are visibly incensed by her claims, and the more that they amplify Broaddrick’s story, the more skeptical progressives become.”

True rape victims must always have a proper partisan alignment. Is that the new feminism?

“‘Rape is about power, not sex.’ For those for whom it’s about power, those are the serial rapist guys, and they hate women and want to punish us,” contends Wonkette editor Schoenkopf. “But I don’t think that’s in every case. I think good men can rape, and be sorry, and not do it again. This is very bad feminism.”

She adds, parenthetically, “Especially if you’re, say, a teenager whose impulse control is still years away from being properly developed.”

Note: Bill Clinton was not a teenager when he allegedly raped Broaddrick.

Ms. Schoenkopf went on to differentiate rape today from way back in the dark ages before the 1980s: “I can absolutely see Bill Clinton doing this (then, not now) and not even thinking of it as rape, but thinking of it as dominant, alpha sex. I can see a LOT of men doing that during that time period, before we started telling them in the ’80s, ‘hey, that is rape, do not do that.’ I can see YOUR NICE GRANDPA doing that, back then.”

In her follow-up piece, she doubled down, explaining, “truly – back then, men were taught that a girl has to say no a couple times before she says yes, so no one will think she is easy.”

Schoenkopf does think Bill Clinton a “jerk.” And “raped at least one woman.” But then, she thinks all men are “very likely” rapists. But no biggie: “we’re all redeemable . . . and that you’d be dismayed to learn some of your loved ones’ secrets — that it’s very likely they too pushed a woman past consent . . .”

It seems common sense has been assaulted.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: billclinton; broadrick; feminists; hillary2016; juanitabroaddrick; rape; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: ClearCase_guy

I actually listened to the stories of my grand mother and mother, so I’m going back to 1900. And ‘no’ always meant ‘no; it was never 3 times ‘no.’ In fact, this whole ‘no’ crap is evil. Good and decent men do not rape women. Period. Rape is an act of violence and lust as is clearly different from the act of love.


21 posted on 08/21/2016 6:42:58 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“‘Rape is about power, not sex.’ For those for whom it’s about power, those are the serial rapist guys, and they hate women and want to punish us,” contends Wonkette editor Schoenkopf. “But I don’t think that’s in every case. I think good men can rape, and be sorry, and not do it again. This is very bad feminism.”

These people are deranged.

22 posted on 08/21/2016 6:53:44 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Then, I've always wondered, why in the hell didn't she press charges against the perverted monster? WHY?
23 posted on 08/21/2016 6:54:35 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

UH, maybe because Bill Clinton was the Attorney General?


24 posted on 08/21/2016 7:19:55 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Your “boilerplate” is spot on, and probably can’t be repeated too often or in too many different ways.

Most grounded individuals in this country can see in individual issues that it’s falling apart, and they know things are changing for the worst in some fundamental way, but generally don’t see the nature of the dark forest made up of those warped trees.


25 posted on 08/21/2016 7:23:44 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing; laweeks

AND he had control over her two businesses. She owned two nursing home in Arkansas then. AND she was actually having an affair with a man who would later become her second husband. The 70’s were NOTHING LIKE TODAY. Women were blamed. Now women are only blamed if the perp is a Democrat.


26 posted on 08/21/2016 7:25:30 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Progressives ALWAYS think that people in the past were stupid and totally unenlightened, whereas people of “today” are brilliant and insightful and much more aware and together.”

Especially themselves.


27 posted on 08/21/2016 8:04:11 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I had a cool idea for a new tagline and I forgot it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

That’s a great book, I reference it often...


28 posted on 08/21/2016 8:18:22 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A feminist, Ms. Schoenkopf explained to her readers why raping Juanita Broaddrick, which she tends to believe Bill Clinton did almost four decades ago, doesn’t make Bill a bad guy . . . or even a bad feminist.

Of course not he pushes ABORTION
That is all that matters
29 posted on 08/21/2016 9:04:38 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Can someone please explain to why commie-skank-extrordinaire Wonkette needs to be listened to any anyone who is NOT to the left of Lenin? I'd really appreciate it if anyone would make even a half-decent argument, really!
30 posted on 08/21/2016 9:15:12 AM PDT by Trentamj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil

I’m thinking that she’d been pressured/threatened into making false statements in the affidavit. The immunity allowed her to recant without the risk of a perjury charge.


31 posted on 08/21/2016 9:23:08 AM PDT by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not auccomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They can’t have it both ways. I thought feminists wanted Pajama Boys who pull out questionnaires before any sex, asking for written consent for every potential physical contact (before the guys just lose interest and go make hot chocolate and look for throw pillows online). Now they say men can have a few gropes at the office or maybe one rape, because they are eeeevil men who can’t control their raging steeds??


32 posted on 08/21/2016 9:28:57 AM PDT by Yaelle (Sorry, Mr. Franklin. We've been extremely careless with our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

they are truly insane.
The same hypocritical faceless people that we encounter all day every day long..


33 posted on 08/21/2016 10:26:54 AM PDT by mowowie (Press 2 for Deportation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Bkmk


34 posted on 08/21/2016 10:36:09 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson