Posted on 08/20/2016 8:06:43 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump won a WikiLeaks presidential poll with 50% of the overall vote, beating Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton by 28%.
The poll, which WikiLeaks ran on their Twitter account for 24 hours yesterday, received over 117,000 votes in total and showed Trump as the clear winner.
While Trump scored 50% of the overall vote, Clinton won just 22%. Green Party candidate Jill Stein followed Clinton with 16% of the vote, and Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson came last with 12%. US poll: Who will you vote to become President?
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) at Faceb his page ook.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Looks like Clinton isn’t winning over a majority of the Bernie people after all
Not a lot of salt of the earth people on Wikileaks so this ipoll s even better than it sounds.
One can dream, but wouldn’t it be funny if Stein beat Cankles?
Trump can win but 28% is ridiculous
Pocono Record daily poll favors Trump
http://www.poconorecord.com/article/20160820/NEWS/160829963
I wouldn’t think that WikiLeaks was ordinarily a hot-spot destination for right-wingers who were likely to vote for Trump....
Why would you post a 3 week old poll? Wilikleaks did one that ended today with 59% Trump
It all depends on which one you stumble across.
No ill intent is necessary.
BTW: Link us to it.
Many followers of WikiLeaks are anti-Clinton, waiting for the next shoe to drop.
debate poll showed Trump always on top and Jeb etc on bottom. Final outcome was exactly like Drudge debate poll.
SHRILLARY OUT!
NO MORE ARCH CRIMINALS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
BILL CLINTON OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
ALL BETS OFF!
Many think electing Trump will bring on their “revolution” that much more quickly.
That’ FINE by me, whatever reason these deluded nuts vote for him is ok by me.
I agree. He'll win by at least 30%, I'm predicting Trump 65%, Cankles 17%.
Bookmark
I would think that WikiLeaks/Twitter followers would be young, but not necessarily likely voters. On the other hand with older voters having land lines, and younger voters mobiles, pollsters have a hard job finding the correct statistical mix of likely voters.
OK, Given that, maybe this is supported by the USC Dornfife Poll internals. Look at the 18-34, African Descent (A/A) and Hispanic.
Comparison of Trump and Clinton demographic margins from 1 week ago vs. today:
Demographic———Aug 14————Aug 21-——Net change
18-34——————HC+13.8-———DT+0.8-——DT+14.6
35-64——————HC+1.8————DT+1.0-——DT+2.8
65+———————DT+1.0————DT+5.3-——DT+4.3
High school———DT+2.6————DT+13.9——DT+11.3
Some college-——DT+4.5————DT+8.0-——DT+3.5
College degree-—HC+19.6-———HT+15.0——DT+4.6
White——————DT+15.9-———DT+20.1——DT+4.2
A/A———————HC+82.3-———HC+70.1——DT+12.2
Hispanic-————HC+39.1-———HC+15.5——DT+23.6
Female-—————HC+12.9-———HC+10.4——DT+2.5
Male-——————DT+4.2————DT+14.8——DT+10.6
<$35K——————HC+18.7-———HC+14.8——DT+3.9
$35K-$75K————DT+10.0-———DT+16.8——DT+6.8
>$75K——————HC+7.9————DT+0.6-——DT+8.5
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3461473/posts
“Trump can win but 28% is ridiculous”.....
Remember William, this is but another poll, although one that we would all hope is accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.