Great story, but lengthy. Had to stop halfway through to do actual work.
The story is flattering, but still biased. Here the author paints a picture of someone who can only be described as brilliant, talented and ethical, someone with a mission to improve our society, yet they can’t write the story without interjecting a lot of pejorative adjectives, even comparing Bannon to Dr. Hyde, as though he’s insane and evil.
I’d like to see in depth stories like this of men like Podesta, Ben Rhodes or Paul Begala. I suspect we’d vomit after the fourth paragraph as we would be so sickened by the self-serving, corrupt arrogance in the profiles.