Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the DNC Keep Press Silent With Cell Jamming Signal? “Officials Barely Acknowledge They Use It”
SHTF ^ | 8/12/2016 | Mac Slavo

Posted on 08/15/2016 3:28:26 AM PDT by combat_boots

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: combat_boots

The following day I’d heard that cellular was jammed/cut off that night, but this is the first time I’ve seen it mentioned since then.

We have cellular, but we keep a landline, too. It’s too easy for cellular to be manipulated.


21 posted on 08/15/2016 7:43:44 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Any chance it was used to block remote detonation of explosives by cell phones? Did it only happen when Hillary was in the room?


22 posted on 08/15/2016 7:45:26 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

If Hillary becomes president, the First Amendment will be shredded


23 posted on 08/15/2016 7:55:57 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
This is clearly illegal, and the penalties are severe.

Yeah, like they're gonna get caught. The FCC has all their guys out there looking for teenagers running pirate radio stations.


24 posted on 08/15/2016 7:56:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

They go to separate switches. But for calls coming into a switch, land lines rank higher.


25 posted on 08/15/2016 8:14:09 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Good question.


26 posted on 08/15/2016 8:15:23 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

“They go to separate switches. But for calls coming into a switch, land lines rank higher.”

If they are separate how is one ranked higher?


27 posted on 08/15/2016 8:24:19 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
We remind and warn consumers that it is a violation of federal law to use a cell jammer or similar devices that intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications such as cell phones, police radar, GPS, and Wi-Fi.

Key word: AUTHORIZED. They just decided not to authorize communication to and from specific locations at specific times. Nothing to see here, move on.

More lawyerspeak weasel words.

28 posted on 08/15/2016 8:48:20 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl; TexasGator
I thought landlines and cell phones were separate systems?

They go to separate switches. But for calls coming into a switch, land lines rank higher.

They are separate until they reach the Exchange. Given a phone number (aaa) xxx-yyyy. 'a' is the area code, a collection of Exchanges, 'xxx' designates a specific the Exchange (referred to as 'switch' above) and 'yyyy' are the 10K individual telephone numbers associated with that Exchange. There may be multiple Exchanges physically located within a single Central Office building.

At the Exchange switch any call not already in digital form (analog) is converted to digital format. All calls are inserted into gaps in the IP data traffic as so much 'filler'. Voice phone calls have a relatively low data rate compared to say, full motion video conferencing, and can tolerate a very high rate of packet loss. The human ear is very good at audio error correction.

Land lines do NOT rank higher than cell phones. A call is a call. A given cell phone tower can only process so many calls at one time. This is primarily a economic consideration. Cell providers don't provide excess capacity unless they absolutely have to.

I have a patent in Electronic Warfare (owned by the Government but my name is on it) which is relevant to the 'jamming' issue in the main body of the thread. Jamming in the civilian world is merely a point source of interference.

If anyone has a question I will try to answer it.

"Ceterum censeo Hillary esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

29 posted on 08/15/2016 11:07:03 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LS

Ping — also this...


30 posted on 08/15/2016 11:08:46 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (Americanism, not globalism, will be our new future. --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
But jamming remains strictly illegal for state and local agencies. Federal officials barely acknowledge that they use it inside the United States, and the few federal agencies that can jam signals usually must seek a legal waiver first.

Well, naturally. I believe running your own email server to process classified information is illegal, too. Anyone caught doing that would be severely punished.

Or not.

31 posted on 08/15/2016 11:18:04 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson