Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Pence shows how it’s done in response to a question about Trump and the Khan family
Hot Air ^ | 8/2/16 | John Sexton

Posted on 08/02/2016 9:53:17 AM PDT by Nachum

During a town hall meeting in Nevada, Mike Pence was challenged on his support for Donald Trump despite Trump’s comments over the weekend criticizing a gold star family. Pence handled the situation well, first calming the crowd and then offering his respect to the person asking the question and then to the Khan family.

“You have a son in the military, how do you tolerate his disrespect?” the woman asked, referring to Trump’s comments over the weekend criticizing Khan’s family. Before she even finished her question the crowd began to boo. Pence waved for them to settle down. “It’s all right,” Pence said adding, “Folks, that’s what freedom looks like and that’s what freedom sounds like.” This brought a round of applause.

Pence turned back toward the woman, who had taken her seat, and said, “Let me just say first I want to honor your son’s service to the country and your family’s service to the country. I truly do.” This brought another round of applause.

“I know this has been much in the news of late, in the last few days, but as I said last night as Donald Trump said Saturday night, Captain Khan is an American hero and we honor him and honor his family as we do all gold star families in this country,” Pence said.

Pence then went beyond the talking points by adding some detail. “The story of Captain Khan is an incredibly inspiring story. June 8th, 2004 he would fall in Iraq…an explosive device in a taxi,” Pence said. He continued,”He was awarded medals, posthumously, because like any great leader he…the accounts of that were that Captain Khan moved people out of the way, told them stay back and he went toward the danger.” “Honestly, again, Captain Khan is an American hero,” Pence

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: khan; pence; trump; vppence; vppense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 next last
To: Mase

Yes, I can say President Trump.

Can you?


181 posted on 08/02/2016 12:05:23 PM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
My POV is that the Wikileaks emails caused Bernie supporters to chant “lock her up” and to walk out of the convention. This is/was a party in disarray and the media actually had to report on it. The fact that she was involved in this intrigue and corruption proves that Comey was covering for her and that she lied about those emails as well. The republicans should be talking about those facts in every encounter they have with the media. Instead, we're talking about some meaningless Muslim for five days now.
182 posted on 08/02/2016 12:06:17 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Mase

I just looked up an example of your analysis. It stunk on ice. I’ll post it if you wish, but that’s for you to decide. My take away is that you see what you want to see—and are unfazed when real life events prove you to be 100 percent wrong.


183 posted on 08/02/2016 12:08:23 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

You believe what you want to believe. We cheer every time that USC poll comes out but even that poll shows Hillary gaining. Yeah, she got a bump from the convention, but she is also deriving benefits from the change in focus from her misdeeds. I don’t see a downhill slide and polls are not very reliable this far out, but only those with blinders on would think that the change in conversation from Hillary’s corruption to Khan benefits Trump and not Hillary.


184 posted on 08/02/2016 12:10:07 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Toliph

And we would hope that some folks on this board who say Trump should be like every failed POTUS candidate for the last 28 years wouldn’t want this one to also apologize and curl into a little ball like some people here.


185 posted on 08/02/2016 12:12:18 PM PDT by ctpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mase

See what I mean? No, of course you don’t.


186 posted on 08/02/2016 12:13:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Toliph

Everything Trump does is calculated. He is in complete contrtol.

Thanks to Trump fighting back after a slimy sharia pushing, Muslim brotherhood immigration lawyer attacked him on the stage of the DNC the whole country now knows who kazir Khan is. The POS has had to delete his Muslim immigration website because he’s starting to feel the heat.

John McStain and Mitt Romney didn’t fight back against Dem attacks and they both lost.

You need to smarten up so you can keep up.


187 posted on 08/02/2016 12:13:44 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mase

‘You believe what you want to believe.’

The irony.


188 posted on 08/02/2016 12:15:46 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Yeah, right. You're serious.

I can't imagine Manafort, or Trump for that matter, thinking their response to Khan was beneficial to the mission. It would also be hard to believe that Trump has surrounded himself with yes men who offer no critique of his responses or counseling about managing future situation. All candidates make mistakes, even though you appear to believe otherwise, but those that learn from them persevere. I think Trump has learned from this and that's a good thing being that it is still early.

189 posted on 08/02/2016 12:18:05 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

No, he is winning with women because the pollsters, who are flunkies in statistics, haven’t bothered to stratify their sampling to pick up an accurate portion of Independent women who lean in a majority to Trump. Their sampling plans are ruined in any event by the 90% nonresponse, skewing responses to left leaning females.

In 2010, Independents comprised 24% of the electorate.

In 2014, Independents comprised 42% of the electorate.

There’s a very good reason why that flip occurred.

Independents of either gender break for Trump by large margins.

Pollsters today are using 2010 registration data and are missing Independents by more than 10%. Thus, they oversample democrats.

If you’re putting trust in ‘polls’, you’re revealing yourself in unflattering ways.

A better signal of where women stand with Trump is in surveying social media and noting the numbers that show up at Trump rallies.


190 posted on 08/02/2016 12:18:24 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Why don’t you stick it.

I did - to you, shill.

Get out.

191 posted on 08/02/2016 12:18:39 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mase

“The republicans should be talking about those facts in every encounter they have with the media. Instead, we’re talking about some meaningless Muslim for five days now.”

So when a baseless attack is for the hundredth time leveled against Trump should he just ignore it?

And if so how has that strategy worked for the last 5 gop POTUS or candidates?

Ignore the baseless attacks and the false narrative still becomes true in people’s minds much like Bush never responding to Iraq war untruths/negative progaganda and Romney killing people’s wives and not caring about them. You have seen elsewhere that Khan is now totally in retreat, correct? Would ignoring Khan and “focusing on Hillary” have produced that result?

Trump and his staff can walk and chew gum at the same time. Don’t worry there are 14 - 18 waking hours in a day. Trump can respond to these baseless attacks and attack Hillary on other fronts as well. People can also pay attention as well.


192 posted on 08/02/2016 12:19:28 PM PDT by ctpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

*Yawn*


193 posted on 08/02/2016 12:19:38 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

You couldn’t even comprehend my post. You thought I was talking about Trump when I used the word “flagrant” but I was clearly referring to Hillary. Hard to be objective when you can’t be objective.


194 posted on 08/02/2016 12:22:13 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Mase

“The only reason Khan gets coverage is because the candidate engages the conversation.”

No the reason Khan gets coverage is because that’s what’s on the media’s playbook that day or week. Much like in football the defense can’t tell the offense what plays it can or can’t run. The media won’t deviate from the playbook.

Trump is playing good defense and taking the play away from them. Notice the retreat by Khan (saying he wants to disengage, scrubbing his web site.

Pence handles it his way and that’s fine but Trump needs to handle it his way.


195 posted on 08/02/2016 12:23:48 PM PDT by ctpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Mase

‘All candidates make mistakes, even though you appear to believe otherwise’

On what basis do you posit this lie?


196 posted on 08/02/2016 12:26:37 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Mase
You thought I was talking about Trump when I used the word “flagrant”...

I have no idea what you're talking about now.

197 posted on 08/02/2016 12:28:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Better for you to yawn than to give me the go ahead to post what I found. It’s truly delusional.


198 posted on 08/02/2016 12:29:17 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Mase

I just reread every post you’ve made to me and you didn’t use the word ‘flagrant’ in any of them. Is your blood sugar getting low?


199 posted on 08/02/2016 12:34:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: LTC.Ret

I will keep you in mind when I get a reply (if any)


200 posted on 08/02/2016 12:38:26 PM PDT by HippyLoggerBiker (Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson