Posted on 07/29/2016 12:15:30 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Methinks somebody at Moody's really wants one of those government jobs.
Another progressive-government approved financial cartel
10 million jobs, mostly at gun and body armor manufacturers
Yeah, like Obama’s shovel ready jobs. Total BS. Total DemocRat.
And no telling how much he donated to Hillary super pacs.
Smokin’ some strong stuff there, friends. Socialism doesn’t grow economies.
The word “would” should be “could”. There is a big difference.
How many jobs did Moody’s predict the Obama administration would create in 2008 and what was his record from January 20, 2009 through January 20, 2013?
How many jobs did Moody’s predict the Obama administration would create in 2012 and what was his record from January 20, 2013 through today?
What Moody’s did not say is how many jobs we need per month just to deep up with the difference between people entering the work force and people retiring from the work force plus one two hundred and eighth of the number of people who have been discourage enough to stop looking for work who are not retired. That number is probably something on the order of 125,000 jobs a week. Since 4*52*125,000 is 26 million, a Hillary economy would be a disaster as bad as the Obama economy.
In China, Indonesia, and Mexico.
If the economy grows, some people will make money. Isn’t that...bad?
Hillary’s economy is Obama’s economy.
And Obama’s economy is bad, very bad.
This is nonsense and a lie from Moody’s.
Probably would, just not for Americans.
take your pick of links, they say the same:
http://cis.org/all-employment-growth-since-2000-went-to-immigrants
in this ‘factcheck’ article, notice that the jobs they claim didn’t go to illegals/migrants, went to people OVER the age of 65 (which would be part-time jobs that older people on social security had to take to meet living expenses)
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/01/all-u-s-jobs-did-not-go-to-immigrants/
They are basing this on “ the country needs to “INVEST in education, infrastructure”, etc. Those are the key words to more stimulus and government spending, not helping ordinary citizens but helping unions and public employees. Government investment is code word for government redistribution.
Work, concentration, and re-education camps.
Having said this, what he is asking for is fiscally unsound. His tax and spending proposals will result in very large deficits and a much higher debt load. A future Congress may be able to rein in this profligacy, but it will not be easy, as there is a gulf between what he says he wants on taxes and spending and what it will take to make the budget arithmetic work. He is also very suspicious of globalization. His willingness to threaten higher tariffs on U.S. trading partners and his sharp criticism of major trade deals signal a reversal on the long-running expansion of U.S. trade and foreign investment. Requiring millions of undocumented immigrants to leave the country also signals less openness to the rest of the world. The upshot of Mr. Trumps economic policy positions under almost any scenario is that the U.S. economy will be more isolated and diminished.
https://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/2016-06-17-Trumps-Economic-Policies.pdf
Globalist shill.
They’re all paid off
Not so good since 94 million are out work and millions of illegals are streaming in.
Crock of crap!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.