Posted on 07/29/2016 11:11:30 AM PDT by C19fan
Hillary Clinton may be a monochrome pantsuit kind of gal, but her daughter Chelsea Clinton clearly can't resist a pretty dress.
The 36-year-old introduced her mom at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night in a figure-hugging Roland Mouret sheath, which she picked out in a bright red hue that was sure to make a stand out.
The $2,215 dress — which was also worn in May by actress Jessica Alba — showed that the mother-of-two has truly come a long way since her awkward teen years during her first time around in the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Paid for by the exorbitant salary her fail hedge-fund husband “earned:.
She’s about as well put together as a mud fence but nowhere near as useful.
IVANKA
Whenever Maureen Dowd is mentioned here someone posts a photo of Catherine. I am always grateful.
I motion that every time Chelsea is mentioned on this forum that we must post an IVANKA photo. Preferably more than one.
Anyone second the motion?
That is a hideous getup to wear on stage. No more fashion sense than her mother. Sad.
Ivanka’s $135 dress was much lovlier. Then again, Ivanka appears to be a much happier soul.
Since she lives in a $10,000,000 NYC Apartment, she was dressing down only spending $2200 on her outfit.
She probably would have spent more if her Husband didn’t lose 90% of his Client’s money in a Greek Investment Fund.
Funny how none of Trump’s Children live in such an expensive Housing and they all work for a Living.
LOL...good idea...it could stand for ‘outsmarted the dress’. Yeah....that’s it :D
AMEN! Looks like it was made of polyester and came off the rack at the local K-Mart or Kohl’s.
Much nicer and much cheaper. What can you say? The dress was not flattering. May be a dark navy dress would have looked better.
Q: Does this dress make me look fat?
A: No, the dress doesn’t make you look fat...
It is back. It’s called Spanxx. Chelsea would have needed a double layer.
Compared to Ivanka she is pretty sad. Ivanka wore a $138 dress to introduce her dad for his acceptance speech and was a knock-out.
The Clintons are still so dirt poor they can't afford mirrors in the dressing room.
It was on sale for $138.00.
Beautiful dress. Off course, what wouldn’t look good on Ivanka?
Funny...the party of the little people, spends the money and wears a $2200 dress for their convention.
Meanwhile, the daughter of the #121 richest person in the US (according to Forbes) wears a simple dress, that most women in the US can afford.
While the one, for the party of the little people, flaunts her money, wearing a $2200 dress, the evil rich girl creates and wears dresses the common folk can afford.
Now...which one looked better in what they wore???
Holy boner assassins, Batman!
Who better to advocate for the little people than a woman who never worked a day in her life, had a 3 million dollar wedding, lives in a 10 million dollar townhouse, has a mother that makes 250K a speech, a husband who runs a hedge fund, and a father in law who is a convicted felon specializing in financial scams?
Probably paid for out of the expense account at the clintoon crime foundation for the betterment of.......the clintoons. So, will she resign from the board of CGI?
Oh, ok! Thanks for the update.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
