NY Times: A Worry if Hillary Clinton Wins: What to Do With Bill (Freeper input needed)

NY Times ^ | July 26, 2016 | Patrick Healy

[Zakeet]

If Hillary Clinton wins the presidency, Bill Clinton will not become a regular at cabinet meetings, his wife's advisers say. He will not be invited into the Situation Room. He will step away from his family's foundation work and may not even have an office in the West Wing, given the undesirable optics of a former president and husband looking over the shoulder of the first female commander in chief.

But the steps Clinton aides are planning to shape his new life do little to address a potentially thornier problem: Historically, when Mr. Clinton does not have a job to do, he gets into trouble.

It was during the government shutdown in 1995 that Mr. Clinton began his affair with Monica Lewinsky. It was in the early years after he left the White House that his friendships with wealthy playboys became tabloid fodder. Sidelined by Mrs. Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, Mr. Clinton went rogue and started lashing out at Barack Obama. More recently, his dinner with the businessman Mark Cuban and his tarmac encounter with Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch were reminders that when Mr. Clinton has time on his hands, he can create dangerous distractions for his wife.

"He loves getting involved in things - no one loves policy and politics more than Bill Clinton," said Mickey Kantor, a longtime friend and secretary of commerce under Mr. Clinton. "He loves, and needs, to have a purpose."

[RichInOC]

Bill would prefer to go out with a smile on his face like Nelson Rockefeller...not screaming, crying and gasping for breath like Megan Marshack.

[Reverend Wright]

If Bill acts up in any way, Hillary will enlist the services of Senator Jodi Ernst

[Future Useless Eater]

How can an unindicted criminal be elected?

I like it... But maybe something else like that might catch on better? Unindicted Felon?

I remember when "unindicted co-conspirator" was very popular and it helped bring down Nixon.

"Mata-Hari" was the stage name for Margaretha Zelle, who was convicted of being a spy and executed by firing squad in France.

So maybe "Unindicted Mata-Hilly" is very fitting??

(I have no photo-shopping program so could someone help me transpose Hilly's face over Hari's please?)

By the way, in reference to the topic of this thread, the supposed "FBI insider" said on July 2nd that BC is likely to die of natural causes this year.

That same FBI insider also said FORGET about the EMAILS. The Clintons WANT everyone focusing ONLY on Emails. Focus instead on the Clinton Foundation because those crimes easily rise to the level of high treason in anyone's eyes worldwide.

And if exposed, her tampering with other government leaderships (in exchange for millions in foreign CF donations) would probably cause declarations of war against the US.

IF anyone wishes to read that FBI thread first hand, go here...
http://archive.is/gxUlc
...and search for "Clinton will likely die this year." That is the insider, answering a Q&A series of questions.

[Rockpile]

I had a vision of each one’s cadre of assassins whacking each
other in sort of a mob war.

Of course Bill and Hillary would have different versions of
“Going to the mattresses”.

[Chode]

Clinton Global Crime Initiative Logo...

[trebb]

Idle hands are the Devil’s workshop.

Anthony Wiener should have tried that as an excuse....

[CAluvdubya]

Being a grieving widow would give her added gravitas. If she becomes the next President... “heart attack,” I’m betting.

No matter what happens, he's pretty much a goner. If she's behind in the polls, I've long said she'll "off" him to get the sympathy vote. You said if she wins she'll "off" him to be the grieving widow. In addition, if she loses she'll "off" him because there would be no use for him at all anymore.

Yep, ol' Bill's a goner.

[Iron Munro]

The Ten Million Dollar Piglet

[SisterK]

die of accelerated natural causes

[JayAr36]

If I were Billy Jeff I would be very worried. If she does make it she will not have any more need for him. He will have provided the path for her rise to power and now that she is at the top, GOODBYE BILLY BOY!

[RightGeek]

Love it!

[LucyT]

That same FBI insider also said FORGET about the EMAILS. The Clintons WANT everyone focusing ONLY on Emails. Focus instead on the Clinton Foundation because those crimes easily rise to the level of high treason in anyone's eyes worldwide.

And if exposed, her tampering with other government leaderships (in exchange for millions in foreign CF donations) would probably cause declarations of war against the US.

Check out # 83 .

Thanks, Future Useless Eater.

[WENDLE]

Good info. Thanks. We are living in an oligarchy. We have no power

[AppyPappy]

Busty Young Interns
It seems to be his forte.

[thesligoduffyflynns]

Thanks for this great post- i’ll be going to the link you posted!

[thesligoduffyflynns]

went to your link ....sorry to say it’s not user friendly?

[Future Useless Eater]

You're right. Its not user friendly. I found it very hard to read, but with perseverance, I was able.
The key to that page is to search for posts made by user "bTgVpkEd". That is the insider talking.

Then whenever he is responding to someone ELSE's post, he starts out with a chevron and number, 
like 79483989 below, which I think is a timestamp-tag of someone else's question that he is replying to. 
 
In the example below, the Insider's post is timestamp-tagged to the right of his name as (No.79484385)

example:
bTgVpkEd) 07/02/16(Sat)06:55:17 No.79484385▶>>79484552 >>79484598 >>79486841

    >>79483989
    Impossible to determine at this point. We could do it tomorrow if we wanted. There are too many political players involved.

[disndat]

[Future Useless Eater]

You're right. Its not user friendly. I found it very hard to read, but with perseverance, I was able.
The key to that page is to search for posts made by user "bTgVpkEd". That is the insider talking.

Then whenever he is responding to someone ELSE's post, he starts out with a chevron and number, 
like 79483989 below, which I think is a timestamp-tag of someone else's question that he is replying to. 
 
In the example below, the Insider's post is timestamp-tagged to the right of his name as (No.79484385)

example:
bTgVpkEd) 07/02/16(Sat)06:55:17 No.79484385▶>>79484552 >>79484598 >>79486841

    >>79483989
    Impossible to determine at this point. We could do it tomorrow if we wanted. There are too many political players involved.

[thesligoduffyflynns]

thanks for the key- i’ve bookmarked this