Obama unloads on Trump, promises to protect Mexico relationship

Politico ^ | 07/22/16 | Nick Gass

[mkjessup]

We’ll have to agree to disagree here. The libtards and leftists thought it was great sport to refer to GWB as a ‘chimp’ and they hid behind the First Amendment to do so, this is merely a case of ‘goose and gander’.

[sargon]

I’ve requested that your racist post be deleted.

[mkjessup]

That’s fine. I leave it up to the mods.

[sargon]

Apparently great minds think alike. How do you expect there to be any chance to draw more Blacks into conservatism when you post words like that, combined with images like that?

Sorry, there's no place for that, no matter how angry you are...

Vote Trump!

[ilgipper]

Trump is running against Clinton, Obama, the GOP, the media and wow how tied. Next week he’ll be running against Bill Clinton too.

[Paladin2]

#30 is apparently beyond the outer reaches of the 1st.....

[Dick Bachert]

I hope Trump won't "protect" that relationship as effectively as this guy did!

The reemergence Vicente Fox and his profane comments about Trump prompt me to resurrect my "blast from the past" (FROM 2001) concerning the Bush clan's participation in the destruction of America's sovereignty! That Bush "participation" almost certainly explains why we REJECTED JEBBY!

It took obozo's addition of the muzzies to the mix to assemble -– FINALLY – a critical mass of our fellow citizens to begin what I PRAY is a movement to put a halt to our GLOBALIST OLIGARCH PLANNED national/cultural suicide!

In ABSTRACT terms, this is the conspiratorial view of what’s going on vis-à-vis the INVASION of the illegals here:

The current alien invasion from the south serves BOTH the elites who run Mexico – and many of the OTHER states of Central and South America -- and the political ruling class who increasingly run the United States:

· It takes pressure off the 60 or so families who control approximately 80% of the wealth in Mexico. Without the northern “safety valve” (the United States) for their poor, those poor MIGHT be inclined to do what America’s early colonists found it necessary to do: Revolt! Parenthetically, that would be MY suggestion for them: Instead of fleeing here – and converting “here” to a larger, more poverty infested version of “there,” they ought to stay there and make “there” into their version of “here,” whatever that would be. Revolutions ARE messy and there are no guarantees that TREACHERY they will produce the desired result. But – according to one T. Jefferson – they are often necessary. Never forget that THIS country was born in revolution!

[RayChuang88]

Why does it seem everything the Left does nowadays is turning into fodder for Trump campaign commercials? (rolling eyes heavenward)

[CodeToad]

Democrats: ALWAYS for the foreigner and always against Americans!

[bert]

The drug money paying Malia’s and Shasha’s tuition at Sidewll Friends must be protected

[Rummyfan]

Other than the food and cheap labor and the opportunity to set up inexpensive manufacturing, just what do we the U.S. get out of this relationship?

[falcon99]

And what relationship with Mexico would that be, the one where we repeatedly bend over and say “kick us”?

[jimbug]

The most divisive president in U.S. history complaining about heated rhetoric. If it wasn’t so sad it would be funny.

[AndyJackson]

some high level folks in DC need to..

This is D.C. you are talking about here. "Some high level folks" don't have to do nut'tin. And that is exactly what they are doing. And they are doing it with your tax money.

[mkjessup]

Interesting that you would bring up the idea of bringing more blacks into conservatism. I have lived in black neighborhoods more than a few times in my life, and the one thing that I have learned from those experiences is that blacks are among the very first to call some of their misbehaving brothers and sisters ‘n*ggers’ and I’ll be the first to agree that there are both white, black, hispanic and all sorts of ‘n*ggers’ across the racial spectrum.

It isn’t so much the color of the skin, but as Martin Luther King said, “the content of their character”, which is why the #black-thugs-stutter low lifes are doing so much harm to racial relations in this country, led by the head n*gger in the White House. I’ve heard more black people refer to Obama with that label, than you might care to believe. There are of course low-info-mofo voters who are concerned only with what their federal ‘RAT masters can deliver to them in exchange for their fealty, but the current crop of black terrorists running wild have no idea of what REAL bigotry is, their answer is to burn down white businesses, homes and murder whites, not to peacefully seek change the way blacks did in Birmingham Alabama (for example) during the 1960’s.

I used that now deleted graphic to show my contempt not for blacks, but for one specific individual who *happens* to be black, and I chose that graphic because of it’s highly offensive nature, because I can think of no one more deserving of it than that porch monkey Barack Hussein Obama.

And I can virtually guarantee that if that graphic had not been removed, there would have been more than a few blacks (conservative blacks) who might have stumbled across it and said “right on!”.

We have unfortunately devolved into a latter day vulgar and racist society, and it has been created by the most insidious racist of all, the current occupant stinking up the Oval Office since January 20, 2009.

They called down the thunder, and they’re gonna get it.

[AndyJackson]

P.S. And if you don’t like it you can complain to the FBI and they won’t do anything either. “No reasonable prosecutor...”

[Ancesthntr]

I value partnerships, too. REAL partnerships, where each side gets roughly equal value.

Right now, and for quite some time, we have NOT had a partnership with Mexico. It is much more like the relationship of a parasite to its host...and if anyone has to ask which country is which, then they have their head shoved quite far up their No Sunshine Here Canal.

[Ancesthntr]

“Every time obama opens his mouth it is a free Trump commercial...”

---

This falls in neatly with my theory that he really does NOT want Hillary to win - because if he did, he’d STFU. He’s not THAT stupid, he KNOWS that people are very tired of him. He could do what he had to, play golf and sneak desserts behind the Wookie’s ample ass the rest, and let Hillary rise or fall on her own. Instead, he’s just opening up his yap every day and making not only a bigger fool of himself, but destroying her chances of victory.

Why? Because if she loses, his the King of the Hill in Dem politics for 4 more years. HE is the go-to guy in the Dem pay-to-play machine, and she’s a nobody. But if she wins, he becomes irrelevant 10 minutes after the inauguration speech finishes (when HRC shakes his hand and whispers in his ear, “Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, Barrack!”), and has no stream of cash from the pay-to-play foundation that he’d like to set up.

Keep talking, Barrack, keep talking!

[GodAndCountryFirst]

Given that OZero, Hitler-y and many other leading DemoRATS will be in prison soon after Trump is elected, I don’t see how they will be able to help Mexico much.

[AC86UT89]

What an ass! The current president chiming in to attack the candidate from the other party during an election campaign. During a meeting with a foreign head of state!

This would be like George W Bush sitting with Stephen Harper of Canada in the run up to the 2008 election and criticizing Obama’s Iraq War policy.

Or Reagan sitting with Brian Mulroney in 1988 and attacking Mike Dukakis.

Of course those things never happened because no president has ever done this before!

Obozo plays in the gutter! No class!