Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killer robot used by Dallas police opens ethical debate
Associated Press ^ | Jul 8, 2016 8:04 PM EDT | Michael Liedtke and Bree Fowler

Posted on 07/08/2016 5:10:15 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: Hugin

Okay, but just remember. When it is you or I that the JBTS have got treed, then we will get the same kind of raw deal.


161 posted on 07/09/2016 3:56:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well I plan on obeying the law, so I don’t have anything to worry about.
Maybe, there’s a 0.0000001% chance that something could happen to me at the hands of the police, but I’ll take my chances.


162 posted on 07/09/2016 3:58:10 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yeah those Dallas cops were real jackbooted thugs for killing someone who murdered 5 cops and wounded 7, and was still trying to kill more.

If you get “treed”, are shooting at cops and refuse to surrender, you are going to be killed. It hardly matters if it’s by gunshot or robobomb.


163 posted on 07/09/2016 4:05:46 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

How long was it from the time he fired his last shot and when the police decided to kill him?


164 posted on 07/09/2016 4:06:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What difference does that make? He was still armed and threatening to kill more cops. They sent in the robot and gave him the choice to surrender or die. He chose to die. I’m fine with it. Why should the cops give him the chance to kill more when they had a safe alternative? Why does it matter if a cop pushed a button rather than pulling a trigger, other than it didn’t put them at risk?

Sounds to me like you sympathize with the perp more than the cops.


165 posted on 07/09/2016 5:20:42 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Exactly. Surrender or die.

I get that you (and many others here) are okay with the police taking upon themselves the roles of judge, jury, and executioner.

Johnson admitted he did it. The police certainly saved the nation a lot of drama, and the taxpayers a lot of money.

It is only my personal opinion that it is reprehensible no matter how vile the suspect may be.


166 posted on 07/09/2016 5:30:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I get that you (and many others here) are okay with the police taking upon themselves the roles of judge, jury, and executioner.

That's not what they are doing. Killing someone who is armed and threatening others is not something new. If they killed him after he was captured him it would fit that description. Why should he have been given a chance to either kill more right then or get away and kill more later? That's just nuts. By your logic, if someone breaks into your home and is about to kill your spouse and you shoot him you are "acting as judge, jury and executioner".

167 posted on 07/09/2016 5:43:17 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

This is why the question “how much time passed between when he fired his last shot” is important. It has been reported the police had been negotiating with him for more than an hour.

Did he really pose an immediate threat, or did the police, for their own reasons, simply decide to end it all with a (literal) bang?

When (if) the whole story comes out, then the world will know for certain f DPD took the law into its own hands.


168 posted on 07/09/2016 5:50:42 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

http://webneel.com/webneel/blog/25-3d-robots-relationship-human-vision-future-franz-steiner


169 posted on 07/10/2016 12:53:55 AM PDT by Pelham (Barack Obama, representing Islam since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Thanz


170 posted on 07/10/2016 6:08:18 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson