Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing ready to confront Washington if it intervenes in S.China Sea dispute
RT ^ | 07/05/16

Posted on 07/05/2016 12:15:01 PM PDT by Enlightened1

Beijing must prepare to make the US “pay a cost it can’t stand” if it intervenes in the South China Sea dispute by force, a state newspaper editorial has warned, days before a court at The Hague rules on the territorial row between China and the Philippines.

The American military build-up in the South China Sea, including the deployment of two carrier strike groups, comes in defiance of China’s vital interests and represents “a direct threat to national security,” the state-run Global Times said in strongly-worded editorials in its Chinese and English editions on Tuesday. 

Beijing should accelerate developing its strategic deterrence capabilities to contain the United States, the newspaper added.

“Even though China cannot keep up with the US militarily in the short-term, it should be able to let the US pay a cost it cannot stand if it intervenes in the South China Sea dispute by force.”

China is a peaceful country that welcomes dialogue on the disputed region, the influential newspaper wrote, “but it must be prepared for any military confrontation.”

The Global Times is believed to have close ties with the government as it operates under the auspices of the Communist Party’s official newspaper, the People’s Daily.

(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; conflict; ready; washington

1 posted on 07/05/2016 12:15:01 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

2 posted on 07/05/2016 12:15:50 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
spratlyislands
3 posted on 07/05/2016 12:17:05 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping


4 posted on 07/05/2016 12:17:18 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade ( America's Party! Tom Hoefling/Steve Schulin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

It sounds like that message was more for their neighbors than us.


5 posted on 07/05/2016 12:19:45 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The bulk of our industrial base is there. We are never fighting a serious war with China and they know it.


6 posted on 07/05/2016 12:20:20 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“Calling out” ubama is about like calling out the 95 lb sissy at your Jr. High. No consequences whatsoever.

They wouldn’t play this game with Ronald Reagan.

Oldplayer


7 posted on 07/05/2016 12:20:49 PM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They concede they cannot defeat the US Navy operating 200 miles of Hainan island.


8 posted on 07/05/2016 12:23:28 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

At this point let them have the stupid islands.

Like what are we protecting them for? Because we have the “moral high ground”? Please...


9 posted on 07/05/2016 12:25:03 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

The “bulk?” LOL


10 posted on 07/05/2016 12:28:55 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Don’t worry, our transgendered, PC military will be ready to suffer a great loss of life to protect freedom of navigation in the S. China Sea. Just tell the American public China is harassing homosexuals there and they will all be on board.


11 posted on 07/05/2016 12:29:12 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Why oh why are we "provoking" China?
/paleo
12 posted on 07/05/2016 12:31:08 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
"At this point let them have the stupid islands. Like what are we protecting them for? Because we have the “moral high ground”? Please..."

Yeah, concepts like treaties and freedom of the seas are so 20th century.

13 posted on 07/05/2016 12:44:53 PM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

But no matter what, we must keep on buying cheap crap from China! We have to fund their war machine.


14 posted on 07/05/2016 12:48:54 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Ok?

Lets toss our rancid corrupt state against theirs then.

Whichever one kills the most wins the sand dots.


15 posted on 07/05/2016 12:50:06 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Before World War II Japan built aircraft runways on islands in the Pacific.


16 posted on 07/05/2016 1:52:08 PM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson