May a Pox come upon Vox!!
sure, but’s okay to call out right side conservatives who cling to their guns and bibles, got it...moron.
Dhimmi
Bush was bad on this subject also. Obama is worse but Bush had his lips locked to Saudi buttocks.
As soon as I read “Bush Administration” I knew this would be a bunch of garbage.
Will I guess he is right. By not saying “Radical Islam the problem has gone away!
No wonder they are such complete F***ups for the last several decades.
“But to Muslims, or for anyone familiar with the many strands of Islam, the phrase connotes a direct link between the mainstream of the Muslim faith and the violent acts of a few.”
We knuckle-draggers need a PhD in Nuance to understand these Elites.
The entire premise of the article is that there are Muslims who are violent and extremist!
The real question is: WHY do Obama and Hillary care about making this tortuous nuance? Why does it matter if any Muslim is offended by words that should describe someone else?
The viable answers are clear to anyone, and they’re all frightening.
Sorry, you're out. I will read no more.
The author erred. Islam, radical or otherwise, is not a race; it is a religion.
Nakhleh, who was born in Palestine and served in the CIA for 16 years before retiring in 2006, is a Muslim.
George W. Bush nominated a Muslim, Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad to be United States Ambassador to the United Nations after the Democrats refused to confirm John Bolton.
UN Ambassador is the highest post attained by a Muslim in the United States government.
So here is the logic of Bushes, rino leaders, Ryan’s, Kerry’s, and countless others...worse from 0bama who is a Muslim.
Close your eyes, imagine you are a rich, aristocratic family member, well plugged in politically...you know no matter what happens in your country, you are well taken care of.
Then, you build awall around your estate(much like immigration Zuckerberg did ), you hire guards, security detail, and you say all the right things to not offend anyone.
You refuse to read or believe the Ko-ran, but you are sure of what it must say...you view those who believe it contains things telling its followers to hate and kill nonbelievers schools or morons...yet ...somehow also you believe yourself to be above such silly beliefs...
You hear about violence around the world and even in your own country...this doesn’t sway your beliefs...you turn to your wife on your satin sheets and ask her, “why do they (your citizenry, plebes) behave that way, we’ve given them everything and all the best laws and government people, you would think they would appreciate us.”
I know I am spot on...these people deserve punishments fit for traitors or at least how I would treat an annoying zit.
Should he be bragging much about his role in a responsible position to be protecting us from Mohammadans in the early 2000’s?
I agree. In “Radical Islam,” the “Radical” is either redundant or unnecessary.
Islam is radical.
Islam is terrorism.
They are one and the same regardless of how they may be playing make believe at the time.
The writer, who appears to possibly be a mohammedan, is full of shiite.
In a sense (but not the one he means, I read the whole article) he’s right. No need to say “radical” Islam.
You can just say “Islam”, because the Koran, the Hadiths and all devoute religious Islamic scholars, and those who listen to them, know that the basic tenet of Islam is to push for a world wide caliphate with Sharia law implemented, and all kaffirs (non-mohammdans) killed, forcibly converted, or made into slaves.
Why are you posting this crap? The writer is so full of crap it almost made my gorge rise.
He apparently thinks that the purpose of American policy should be “engaging muslim communities.” Many of us disagree with this point of view.
A person from Iran told me that Islam is spread by murder and rape. I think he’s right.